http://wnep.com/2017/01/10/highlight...makes-history/
Cliffs: magazine for children depicts gay couple. Putin was fukkin spot on when he told the gays to "leave the kids alone" in Russia. Article quotes a gleeful SJW looking forward to receive books about trannies.
|
-
01-11-2017, 03:51 PM #1
Oh look, a magazine for children has decided to put forward the gay agenda
Deuteronomy 28:35
-
01-11-2017, 03:54 PM #2
-
01-11-2017, 03:56 PM #3
-
01-11-2017, 04:00 PM #4
-
-
01-11-2017, 04:02 PM #5
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40533
Next you're going to tell me the magazine has already had interracial couples. Have they no shame? How dare they depict families as they exist.
Surely this will make small children start plowing each other in the playgroundMake Misc Great Again
dhawkeye1980, March 3rd, 2017 at 12:44pm: Um not really most of ACA members are part of the medicaid expansion, i would imagine very little are on obamacare.
-
01-11-2017, 04:09 PM #6
-
01-11-2017, 04:11 PM #7
-
01-11-2017, 04:12 PM #8
-
-
01-11-2017, 04:16 PM #9
-
01-11-2017, 04:38 PM #10
Just took a screen shot of that page and sent it to my buddy who has a subscription for his kids. It's been cancelled.
I understand that they want to be inclusive but injecting confusing sexuality into children's magazines when it doesn't need to be is bull****. They have their whole lives to be pummeled by the 63 genders and censorship of the LGBT movement.
The *default* for all children's media(unless specified) should be a mom and dad, not because of backwords Christian beliefs but because 95% of the world identifies this way and has been proven the most socially stable means of families.Last edited by jamesovercome; 01-11-2017 at 04:45 PM.
---------------------------------------
"Fast is not fast enough, strong is not strong enough."
----------------------------------------
-
01-11-2017, 05:12 PM #11
-
01-11-2017, 05:34 PM #12
-
-
01-11-2017, 05:37 PM #13
-
01-11-2017, 05:38 PM #14
-
01-11-2017, 05:40 PM #15
-
01-11-2017, 05:41 PM #16
-
-
01-11-2017, 05:47 PM #17
Well, the general public is already beginning to fight back against it (by electing Trump). I'd say that we should outlaw liberalism entirely. It's been nothing but a cancer to the west and won't be missed.
I think it's probably the way liberals are trying their hardest to make it become more mainstream.
-
01-11-2017, 05:51 PM #18
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 23,500
- Rep Power: 56061
Trump isn't going to do a thing about the LGBTQHRM89 community, he supporst them.
I think it's probably the way liberals are trying their hardest to make it become more mainstream.
[img]http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/15275636_1685299415093512_327608302768750592_n.jpg[img]O|||||||O
-
01-11-2017, 05:57 PM #19
-
01-11-2017, 05:57 PM #20
-
-
01-11-2017, 06:13 PM #21
-
01-11-2017, 06:15 PM #22
-
01-11-2017, 06:43 PM #23
It's not a gay agenda....well it is for gay people but ultimately it's used as a tool for cultural marxists. They will push society until it starts to feel uncomfortable and then it sits. Then it pushes a little further then it sits. Then when people get used to that they push a little further.
I asked a question in a thread less than 3 years ago about what the next big equal rights issue would be.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...hp?t=161874483
Not a single person answered transgenderism, yet before Obama left office he was threatening to withold federal funding to schools that didn't allow males into the girls locker rooms. Why do people suddenly care about this tiny fraction of a fraction of society that for some reason is assumed to be horribly victimized now? Because they pushed the issue. And after that there will be another one. And after that another. Only a mindless drone could remain progressive forever because as society continues to push left any critically thinking person will eventually say "well, it looks like this is where I get off". But we don't see that...or maybe it just appears that we don't because the next generation picks up the baton so quickly and rushes to save the next marginalized group.
I don't have a problem with gay people or even gay people having kids but I have a big problem with society continuing to march us down this path. I created that thread less than 3 years ago and look how far we've come. Think about what kind of sh!t they'll be pushing for when these kids who grew up reading about "their favorite family" as two gay dads are in college in 15 years from now.+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
-
01-11-2017, 06:46 PM #24
-
-
01-11-2017, 06:48 PM #25
-
01-11-2017, 06:50 PM #26
If you can't tell what they're planning on doing to our children based on that pic, then I don't know what to say. There's a reason why they're trying to make it more mainstream.
As for "equality", when a homosexual couple can naturally reproduce offspring, that's when it'll go from being a mental abnormality and into being worthy of "equality". I'm not saying that we need to string these people up, but they certainly don't deserve the pedestal liberals have been putting them upon as of late and more importantly, this chit has no business nor legitimate reason to be taught to our offspring.
I don't think he's on with any of this. I don't really think he cares to be honest.
-
01-11-2017, 06:51 PM #27
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40533
Except for all the religious opposition there used to be against them (never mind all the current non-religiously based oppositing which is currently on display on the misc).
Also, who gives a **** if you have religious opposition to something. I guess you would also agree the magazine should never show people eating pork because that would also drum up religious opposition.Make Misc Great Again
dhawkeye1980, March 3rd, 2017 at 12:44pm: Um not really most of ACA members are part of the medicaid expansion, i would imagine very little are on obamacare.
-
01-11-2017, 06:53 PM #28
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40533
-
-
01-11-2017, 07:03 PM #29
-
01-11-2017, 07:09 PM #30
It's not about equal rights, which you would see if you quote the rest of my post. It's about blurring the line. Do you think it's ok to make it a hate crime to refuse to call someone by a completely made up name to represent their completely made up gender? Do you think a guy should be allowed in the shower room at your local pool or gym? It's the post-modernist push that tells everyone they can make up their own reality. And they wont stop with transgenderism it'll just keep going. Lots of people are already looking around going "how did we get here?"....well it didn't happen accidentally and you can be sure that in 15 years we'll be even worse off if current trends continue.
+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
Bookmarks