Seriously, the closer I get to 10% the more I have to cut to lose an ounce. I'm eating at a 1,000 calorie-a-day deficit right now. (Which is not easy, by the way. Cardio is now a requirement just to be able to eat dinner). And I'm just holding steady- maybe fluctuating between ounces where I used to fluctuate between pounds.
It's hard for me to make sense out of it. If 3,500 calories = 1 pound lost, and I cut 7,000 calories from my maintenance per week, then why is it taking me a month to lose a pound? Why does it get harder?
I've heard that metabolism slowing down is a myth at worst, and irrelevant at best. Apparently, consensus is that the amount that your body's metabolism slows to account for the deficit will never outweigh the deficit itself. So that's not the issue.
I probably only have about 5-10 pounds to lose and still be healthy. If my body is struggling to retain that fat, then where is my calorie deficit going? I mean, where are those extra calories being burned from? Is my body generating them out of thin air? Is it just learning to be more efficient with what I give it?
I'm at a loss. I don't really want sympathy or advice, I just want an explanation!
|
-
08-03-2011, 06:14 AM #1
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 197
- Rep Power: 167
More like 10,000 calories = 1 lb of weight...
-
08-03-2011, 06:15 AM #2
-
08-03-2011, 06:19 AM #3
-
08-03-2011, 06:21 AM #4
-
-
08-03-2011, 06:23 AM #5
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: London, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 6,869
- Rep Power: 21031
-
08-03-2011, 06:26 AM #6
- Join Date: Jul 2006
- Location: Kings Park, New York, United States
- Posts: 17,891
- Rep Power: 92052
-
08-03-2011, 06:27 AM #7
-
08-03-2011, 06:28 AM #8
-
-
08-03-2011, 06:35 AM #9
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: London, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 6,869
- Rep Power: 21031
According to Lyle Mcdonald's A Guide to Flexible Dieting, people should go on diet breaks after a certain amount of weeks:
Category 1: 4-6 weeks
Category 2: 6-12 weeks
Category 3: 12-16 weeks
Categories are as follow:
Category 1: 15% and lower
Category 2: 16-25%
Category 3: 26% and above
Note: These are body fat percentages
Also, 1000 is a very large deficit, one that should only be used as a last resort. Most people just keep cutting cals and it's unnecessary and hard. A simple diet break can remedy a lot of issues.“Go back?" he thought. "No good at all! Go sideways? Impossible! Go forward? Only thing to do! On we go!" So up he got, and trotted along with his little sword held in front of him and one hand feeling the wall, and his heart all of a patter and a pitter.”
-
08-03-2011, 06:42 AM #10
-
08-03-2011, 06:50 AM #11
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: London, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 6,869
- Rep Power: 21031
5 days isn't long enough. Typically the recommendation is two weeks. Don't try and force something that is not happening. Just relax, eat at maintenance for two weeks and keep track of weight.
Do yourself a favour and read this before you go on a diet break:
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/fat...iet-break.html
I think you should really consider doing it, especially since Lyle recommends people do it after 3-4 months and you've been cutting for 10 months.“Go back?" he thought. "No good at all! Go sideways? Impossible! Go forward? Only thing to do! On we go!" So up he got, and trotted along with his little sword held in front of him and one hand feeling the wall, and his heart all of a patter and a pitter.”
-
08-03-2011, 06:52 AM #12
-
-
08-03-2011, 07:04 AM #13
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: London, Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 6,869
- Rep Power: 21031
"I’d say the big advantage of the slow approach is that it avoid major weight spikes which can cause negative psychological effects. The disadvantage is that it’s less fun and means you have to be meticulous about your food intake the whole time. Also, from the standpoint of the full diet break, you don’t want to take too long to reach maintenance or you won’t get the benefits in terms of fixing metabolic rate. At most you should take the first week (of two) to reach maintenance and spend at least 7 days at maintenance levels."
That's the "slow" approach. Fast approach:
"In a fast approach, calories are basically ramped up to maintenance quickly over a day or two. This can actually be done in concert with a structured refeed, just make the first day(s) of your refeed the return to maintenance. So start your move to maintenance or the full diet break with a structured refeed, then scale back calories and carbohydrates to maintenance levels for the duration.
The drawbacks to this option is that it’s easy to lose control of food intake (what should be a short refeed turns into a long-term binge) and the bloating and water retention can be annoying. Some people also report gastric upset and gas when they ramp up carbs after they haven’t been eating any for a while. I think the fast option is probably best for category 1 dieters (those who aren’t under a time crunch) who already have good food control and won’t have a problem returning to maintenance after a structured refeed. Category 2 and 3 dieters may still be dealing with changing long-term eating habits and the slow option, described next, is probably better overall."“Go back?" he thought. "No good at all! Go sideways? Impossible! Go forward? Only thing to do! On we go!" So up he got, and trotted along with his little sword held in front of him and one hand feeling the wall, and his heart all of a patter and a pitter.”
-
08-03-2011, 07:17 AM #14
You're eating 1300 calories a day? And doing cardio?
I would take a break. Creep calories back up to what you think maintenance is. The hard part is this will take time..you need to reestablish what your true BMR is. To be honest I dont even believe in true BMR, it implies you burn the same amount every day and that its a constant. You will probably put on a few lbs of water weight and it will throw your results off but if you stick with it a few weeks and find a realistic BMR you wont gain weight.
I highly, highly suggest you get one of those bodybugs. I just dont see 1300 calories a day plus cardio being the "proper" way to do it. Your body is fighting with you here. I bet you are fighting constant hunger pains and your body still refuses to drop more weight. I bet you floored your BMR eating that way. Get back to maintenance, get a body bug and eat according to that. I'd slow down to 500 deficit going forward and when you get a true idea of BMR per day you can make better choices. I bet you can easily eat up to 1000 MORE calories then you are now and you'll start losing weight again. I bet you can eat 3000 calories for a week or 3 without gaining a pound (except water fluctuations).
If you are truely eating 1300 calories and doing cardio I dont think thats the right way to do it. There is far more going on in your body then calories in/calories out.
-
08-03-2011, 07:19 AM #15
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Age: 46
- Posts: 197
- Rep Power: 167
Sorry, I should be more specific. I'm doing cardio in order to keep my total calories intake of calories down to 1300. Normally, I eat aout 1600 and burn about 300 per day. Otherwise I feel like I'm starving myself. Cardio allows for that snack of almonds or a mixed drink from time to time.
EDIT: But I get your point. I'll look into the body bug.
-
08-03-2011, 03:27 PM #16
Here is a great way to burn calories!
http://www.fitzness.com/blog/?p=4964
-
-
08-03-2011, 03:36 PM #17
-
08-03-2011, 03:54 PM #18
-
08-03-2011, 04:09 PM #19
-
08-03-2011, 04:14 PM #20
I was eating 1400 cals on a cut a while ago and I wasnt losing much weight at all after a couple of weeks.. its way too low.. for me it was so bad that a lot of random weird stuff was happening to my body on such low cals.. like while deadlifting my left tricep started to pop and a bunch of other weird stuff
like others have said.. take a break and get your metabolism up and then get back on your diet .. but not 1300 cals lol.
-
-
08-03-2011, 05:28 PM #21
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Henderson, Nevada, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 1,588
- Rep Power: 509
Keep in mind that each pound of bodyfat can only provide you with 31 calories per day. Assuming you were 15% bodyfat right now you would have 25 pounds of fat allowing up to a 775 calorie deficit. By the time you get down to 10% you are going to have like 15 pounds of bodyfat which won't even sustain a 500 calorie deficit. This is why weight loss must slow as you drop body fat.
04/2010 - 295 Fattest
11/11/11 - 171.8
-
08-03-2011, 05:29 PM #22
-
08-03-2011, 05:41 PM #23
-
08-03-2011, 05:43 PM #24
-
-
08-03-2011, 05:46 PM #25
A more likely explanation is that you're overestimating your maintenance and not counting your calories correctly.
Having said that, the closer I got to 10% for the first time the slower my progress was - so I understand your frustration. The math didn't seem to add up for me either. Thankfully it was far easier the second time.
-
08-03-2011, 05:48 PM #26
-
08-03-2011, 05:51 PM #27
-
08-03-2011, 06:40 PM #28
Similar Threads
-
WOMEN - Enter The NEW Female Transformation Of The Week.
By the_fake_webmaster in forum Female BodybuildingReplies: 335Last Post: 05-25-2024, 02:03 AM -
Were you treated differently after losing alot of weight?
By quickscott in forum Losing FatReplies: 8012Last Post: 12-05-2017, 11:52 AM -
8,000 calorie binge yesterday..now what?
By gobrowns87 in forum Losing FatReplies: 64Last Post: 04-09-2016, 08:37 AM
Bookmarks