with the new report of muscle milk containing arsenic, lead, mercury and what ever the other toxic metal was called, will they have refund/recall with this?
|
Thread: muscle milk recall??
-
06-02-2010, 08:05 PM #1
-
06-02-2010, 08:06 PM #2
-
06-02-2010, 08:14 PM #3
-
06-02-2010, 08:16 PM #4
-
-
06-02-2010, 08:17 PM #5
-
06-02-2010, 08:20 PM #6
-
06-02-2010, 08:20 PM #7
-
06-02-2010, 08:21 PM #8
-
-
06-02-2010, 08:23 PM #9
what article says ON and muscle tech??
this is the one i read
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06...-lead-mercury/
-
06-02-2010, 08:23 PM #10
-
06-02-2010, 08:25 PM #11
-
06-02-2010, 08:32 PM #12
Honestly I think everyone is blowing this way out of proportion. There should be much more concern over the mercury in tuna than this stuff.
Look under your chair. YOU GET A REP, AND YOU GET A REP, REPS FOR EVERYONE! If I get a rep, you get a rep, every time. Give me a link to make my life a little easier.
If you don't give me a link and you didn't post in the thread you rep'd me in, I'm not gonna go searching for you. I'll get everyone on recharge.
-
-
06-02-2010, 08:36 PM #13
-
06-02-2010, 08:39 PM #14
-
06-02-2010, 08:43 PM #15
-
06-02-2010, 08:48 PM #16
-
-
06-02-2010, 08:49 PM #17
http://www.optimumnutrition.com/news.php?article=874
This could just be hyped up ploy to get people to keep using ON, but i'll keep drinking 2 - 3 shakes a day and see if I die early or not from lollead.
-
06-02-2010, 08:54 PM #18
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 130,807
- Rep Power: 564606
WTF should ON have told us about? Their product tested well below the "limit" that was imposed.
The fact that a protein product was tested and results given means nothing! Please, everybody, stop listing everything that was tested and implying there was a problem when most of them...such as ON...tested favorably!
-
06-02-2010, 08:58 PM #19
-
06-02-2010, 08:58 PM #20
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 130,807
- Rep Power: 564606
Dude....
Optimum tested at 1.5 micro-grams of arsenic for every 90 grams of protein consumed.
Solgar's Whey tested at 1.2 micro-grams of arsenic for every 96 grams of protein consumed.
Are you seriously worried about there being 0.0000003 grams more aresenic from ON for every 90+ grams of protein consumed ??
If you look at the other ON protein it has 2.5 micrograms for 96.....that makes a difference of 0.000001 grams arsenic. For cadmium the ON shows 0.0000017 grams in three scoops.
Realize how small this amount is.
-
-
06-02-2010, 09:00 PM #21
-
06-02-2010, 09:09 PM #22
Why do so many people recommend ON whey?
Isn't the flavoring like sub-par? and they use ion-exchange filtering? And there is CHEAPER quality protein supps out there?
I see people mentioning ON and it's like ... why..
I can understand longevity of it being around, and advertising; however if you're on these forums and read about other multiple types of protein supps, I'm not sure why people would have it as a primary source of a protein supp...Formerly Jouho.
Current/Goal
Bench: 2.5 lbs / 5 lbs
Squat: 3 lbs / 6 lbs
Deadlift: 4 lbs / 7 lbs
*I'm actually an ant irl crew*
-
06-02-2010, 09:21 PM #23
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 130,807
- Rep Power: 564606
Longevity and advertising. It has been around a long time, anybody with any experience in this is familiar with it, it is readily available, the product is as advertised, the flavor and mixability...while not as good as some of the best out there (such as XF)....is still pretty good and, years ago, compared more favorably.
It also used to be less expensive and people got 'stuck' on it. After reading this forum in late 2007 what did I buy when I went out and got protein powder supps? ON. The message you get reading these forums, and others like it, is a bit different today. I took a bunch of time off, came back...and now everybody raves about XF and Myofusion.
-
06-02-2010, 09:58 PM #24
-
-
06-02-2010, 10:01 PM #25
-
06-02-2010, 10:02 PM #26
-
06-02-2010, 10:39 PM #27
-
06-02-2010, 10:44 PM #28
Anyone know where these companies get their raws from? One of the problems with dealing with such a large company that deals in such small profit margins is that they move massive amounts of product. It is easy to have quality control start to slip.
Personally, I've always used MRM natural whey. I guy I know in the industry says they use some of the highest quality suppliers out there. Apparently their whey comes from grass-fed cows in New Zealand.Last edited by G.W. Hayduke; 06-02-2010 at 10:51 PM.
-
-
06-02-2010, 10:56 PM #29
-
06-02-2010, 11:42 PM #30
Similar Threads
-
What's up with Muscle Milk?...looks good
By MurphMan in forum SupplementsReplies: 9Last Post: 02-22-2017, 04:56 PM -
Muscle Milk
By Jay in forum Teen BodybuildingReplies: 16Last Post: 08-25-2015, 05:04 PM -
CytoSport muscle milk
By hardknuckle in forum Product Reviews - Help Out!Replies: 24Last Post: 10-08-2010, 09:54 AM -
Cytosport Muscle Milk, SportsPharma Promax, or MLO Muscle Blast 2000?
By RED_DOG in forum SupplementsReplies: 1Last Post: 04-14-2002, 07:28 PM -
Muscle milk
By gorilla in forum SupplementsReplies: 1Last Post: 01-04-2002, 09:30 PM
Bookmarks