I would like some input and some real life responses on this please. has anyone tested if cardio is more effective before or after lifting. are there any articles explaining pros and cons of each?
|
Thread: cardio before or after lifting
-
01-27-2009, 08:00 PM #1
-
01-27-2009, 08:03 PM #2
-
01-27-2009, 08:04 PM #3
-
01-27-2009, 08:04 PM #4
-
-
01-27-2009, 08:08 PM #5
I do 10-15 minutes before and the 20-30 minutes after depending on the day. Most day it's 15 then 30. On leg day it is 10 the 20. In a month I lost a percent in bodyfat. I also added 4 lbs of lean muscle. I changed my diet as well. I
"Pray for peace, train for war. There can be no freedom without sacrifice."
I rep back
I neg back
Owe Reps to:
-
01-27-2009, 09:04 PM #6
-
01-28-2009, 02:21 AM #7
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 24,222
- Rep Power: 34135
It all comes down to a persons goals and priorities. If you want to prioritize aerobic conditioning and endurance, do cardio first. If you want to prioritize resistance training and muscle mass, lift weight first. The literature related to the long-term effect of exercise sequencing for fat loss is lacking but short-term studies would support weights first as well.
A short cardio warm up is fine if you find it necessary. If your priority is resistance training, then it should be kept short such that it does not introduce fatigue thus negatively affecting the resistance training session. However, some find that they perform better by doing some cardio first. So there really is no black and white answer.
Of course, separate sessions could be an option.
This describes some pros and cons of the various sequences.
http://www.musculardevelopment.com/content/view/223/55It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
-
01-28-2009, 02:27 AM #8
-
-
01-28-2009, 02:31 AM #9
-
01-28-2009, 03:22 AM #10
-
01-28-2009, 06:12 AM #11
Bookmarks