https://twitter.com/i/status/1755372901942038771
^^^^^^ This guy says what many are thinking...
|
Thread: Tucker Carlson Putin Interview
-
02-08-2024, 02:56 AM #1
Tucker Carlson Putin Interview
𝓐𝓲𝓻 𝓕𝓸𝓻𝓬𝓮 𝓥𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷 1976 - 1999 - 𝓒𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓼 𝓔𝓷𝓽𝓱𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓪𝓼𝓽 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓮 1960'𝓼
ᖇᗴ丅Ꭵᖇᗴᗪ ᗩ丅 40 ᑕᖇᗴᗯ - ᔕᗝᑕᎥᗩᒪ ᗪᎥᔕ丅ᗩᑎᑕᎥᑎǤ ᗴ᙭ᑭᗴᖇ丅 - ᒪᎥᐯᎥᑎǤ 丅ᕼᗴ ᗪᖇᗴᗩᗰ
ƚo| ɒ ꙅɿɘʞʞuꟻ bᴎɒ ɿɘʞʞuꟻ ꙅᴎuoᴎoɿq ɿɘbᴎɘǫ ɘʜƚ ɘꙅu I
𝕀 𝕕𝕠𝕟'𝕥 𝕒𝕝𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 𝕒𝕘𝕣𝕖𝕖 𝕨𝕚𝕥𝕙 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕞𝕖𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀 𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕥
🄸 🅃🄴🄻🄻 🄸🅃 🄻🄸🄺🄴 🄸🅃 🄸🅂, 🄸🄵 🅈🄾🅄 🅆🄰🄽🅃 🅂🄼🄾🄺🄴 🄱🄻🄾🅆🄽 🅄🄿 🅈🄾🅄🅁 🄰🅂🅂 🄾🅁 🅂🄾🄼🄴🅃🄷🄸🄽🄶 🅂🅄🄶🄰🅁 🄲🄾🄰🅃🄴🄳. 🄸 🅂🅄🄶🄶🄴🅂🅃 🅈🄾🅄 🄶🄴🅃 🄰 🄷🄾🄾🄺🄴🅁 🄰🄽🄳 🄰 🄿🄾🅆🄳🄴🅁🄴🄳 🄳🄾🄽🅄🅃
-
02-08-2024, 03:37 AM #2
-
02-08-2024, 05:09 AM #3𝓐𝓲𝓻 𝓕𝓸𝓻𝓬𝓮 𝓥𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷 1976 - 1999 - 𝓒𝓪𝓷𝓷𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓼 𝓔𝓷𝓽𝓱𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓪𝓼𝓽 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓮 1960'𝓼
ᖇᗴ丅Ꭵᖇᗴᗪ ᗩ丅 40 ᑕᖇᗴᗯ - ᔕᗝᑕᎥᗩᒪ ᗪᎥᔕ丅ᗩᑎᑕᎥᑎǤ ᗴ᙭ᑭᗴᖇ丅 - ᒪᎥᐯᎥᑎǤ 丅ᕼᗴ ᗪᖇᗴᗩᗰ
ƚo| ɒ ꙅɿɘʞʞuꟻ bᴎɒ ɿɘʞʞuꟻ ꙅᴎuoᴎoɿq ɿɘbᴎɘǫ ɘʜƚ ɘꙅu I
𝕀 𝕕𝕠𝕟'𝕥 𝕒𝕝𝕨𝕒𝕪𝕤 𝕒𝕘𝕣𝕖𝕖 𝕨𝕚𝕥𝕙 𝕥𝕙𝕖 𝕞𝕖𝕞𝕖𝕤 𝕀 𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕥
🄸 🅃🄴🄻🄻 🄸🅃 🄻🄸🄺🄴 🄸🅃 🄸🅂, 🄸🄵 🅈🄾🅄 🅆🄰🄽🅃 🅂🄼🄾🄺🄴 🄱🄻🄾🅆🄽 🅄🄿 🅈🄾🅄🅁 🄰🅂🅂 🄾🅁 🅂🄾🄼🄴🅃🄷🄸🄽🄶 🅂🅄🄶🄰🅁 🄲🄾🄰🅃🄴🄳. 🄸 🅂🅄🄶🄶🄴🅂🅃 🅈🄾🅄 🄶🄴🅃 🄰 🄷🄾🄾🄺🄴🅁 🄰🄽🄳 🄰 🄿🄾🅆🄳🄴🅁🄴🄳 🄳🄾🄽🅄🅃
-
02-08-2024, 05:12 AM #4
-
-
02-08-2024, 07:18 AM #5
Personally, I would rather have more information from both sides of a conflict that we are funding, rather than existing in a self-induced political echo chamber because orange man bad... Different strokes for different folks I suppose.
I don't trust putin one bit, but my trust in our current "leaders" of the US government is about the same.
-
02-08-2024, 07:28 AM #6
-
02-08-2024, 08:10 AM #7
By his own admission, he’s an entertainer not a reliable journalist. He argued this in a court of law.
People may be upset because treating real world issues as bait for views has lots of real world implications.
* Relevant citation from the court case.
"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes." Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable.""it's likely one of us will have to spend some days alone"
-
02-08-2024, 08:19 AM #8
-
-
02-08-2024, 08:34 AM #9
-
02-08-2024, 08:48 AM #10
* "Fox persuasively argues"... TBH I don't care if Tucker is juggling bowling pins while on a unicycle during the interview. He is interviewing the leader of a nation we are in a proxy war with, which is more information from that side of the story than we are seeing in ANY mainstream "news" sources. As such, this provides additional information allowing people to generate their own personal opinions, if they are so inclined...Why hasn't racheal maddaw or whoever you determine to be a "real" journalist conducted such an interview? Also, can something be entertaining and also true? Do you think Joe Biden is running the country? A guy that can't run his own gastrointestinal system, tries to shake hands with nonexistent beings, claims to have recent meetings with long deceased politicians, mumbles incoherent things and falls down regularly...Ya, I'm sure he is running the most powerful nation on the planet. The thought that you believe that is both entertaining and scary.
Last edited by Plateauplower; 02-08-2024 at 08:54 AM.
-
02-08-2024, 09:08 AM #11
To be fair I don't think anybody would be able to do an interview with Putin and have it not be a propaganda piece.
He's not exactly known for being friendly to dissenters or critics.
Which is why no organization with journalistic integrity would agree to the stipulations (explicit or implicitly understood) Putin has likely required to get it to happen in the first place."it's likely one of us will have to spend some days alone"
-
02-08-2024, 09:17 AM #12
-
-
02-08-2024, 09:19 AM #13
-
02-08-2024, 09:24 AM #14
Why wasn’t Russia a problem when MIT Romney said it was a problem?
I remember Biden and Obama laughing at Romney for saying Russia was a problem.
What’s changed that now Biden finally admits Russia is a problem?
I’m starting to think libs are just who conservatives were 10 years ago.As above, so below;
As within, so without.
Nothing rest; everything moves; everything vibrates.
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=185271663&p=1701118833#post1701118833
-
02-08-2024, 10:00 AM #15
I think we both know that is meaningless -- people will say whatever they can in court that will push them in a favorable direction. Whether Tucker is an angel or the devil is really irrelevant. The interview will stand on its own merits
Ah...the old "I'm smart enough to process complexity and nuance, but nobody else is". We've certainly had plenty of propaganda on one side, maybe we should hear what the other side has to say. More information is always better than less
And for the record, I can't stand Putin, but am still interested in his perspective....just as I would be interested in the perspective of Kim Jong Un or Xi Jing Ping.It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
-
02-08-2024, 10:24 AM #16
My thoughts as well. Information is good and could help resolve or prevent conflicts and military actions. I think that is the reason it is forbidden by the current administration. Need to spread some freedom bombs to get those pollical donations from the contractors who are profiting from killing people.
-
-
02-08-2024, 10:34 AM #17
I agree his admission could be meaningless but the fact the court agreed with it in the opinion above is not.
Ah...the old "I'm smart enough to process complexity and nuance, but nobody else is". We've certainly had plenty of propaganda on one side, maybe we should hear what the other side has to say. More information is always better than less
And for the record, I can't stand Putin, but am still interested in his perspective....just as I would be interested in the perspective of Kim Jong Un or Xi Jing Ping.Last edited by 7Seconds; 02-08-2024 at 11:25 AM.
"it's likely one of us will have to spend some days alone"
-
02-08-2024, 10:36 AM #18
-
02-08-2024, 10:36 AM #19
-
02-08-2024, 12:05 PM #20
-
-
02-08-2024, 12:13 PM #21
-
02-08-2024, 12:21 PM #22
I dont follow Carlson but he was up here a few weeks ago stirring up things in Alberta.
I fact checked everything he had to say in his 20min, 85% of it was BS or partial facts, and then spin. Is it like this in the US as well?
This is all about him getting clicks and money.Please record my time/reps if I pass out
-
02-08-2024, 12:25 PM #23
-
02-08-2024, 12:44 PM #24
Are you suggesting that he is not involved in the Russian Ukraine conflict? Or are you suggesting that foreign policy and decisions to finance a proxy war should be made without dialog to understand the underlying conflict? Maybe instead of an "entertainer" going to interview putin, Biden could go talk some sense into him, tell him a corn pop story to get him in-line.
-
-
02-08-2024, 12:57 PM #25
Putin has already stated very publicly his reasoning for Ukraine. I am not sure what new information you expect Carlson would get out of him. There are entirely valid conservative journalists who behave differently from Tucker Carlson who, if they interviewed him, would not have nearly the same level of suspicion cast upon them. People aren’t suspicious of him because he’s a conservative talking head, it’s because he has already spent a considerable amount of airtime pushing Russian propaganda.
ETA: Putin lays out his reasoning pretty clearly here in the article I mentioned above (as well as in Russian state News interviews).
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181
This paper was intended for domestic audiences and for drumming up nationalistic support.
Tucker’s interview is going to be intended for foreign audiences, it's probably going to downplay the nationalistic themes a bit.Last edited by 7Seconds; 02-08-2024 at 01:25 PM.
"it's likely one of us will have to spend some days alone"
-
02-08-2024, 01:08 PM #26
-
02-08-2024, 01:30 PM #27
-
02-08-2024, 02:16 PM #28
He is a talkshow host who gives his opinions....but you are missing the point. Tucker's journalistic chops or lack thereof are irrelevant as the interview will stand on its own merit.
So it IS how you intended it. No matter, you undermine your own point here if he is doing little more than preaching to the choir. Sympathetic? Or perhaps not overtly hostile? It is no secret that Tucker isn't a fan of US involvement in the Ukraine war. That alone could be the explanatory factor, but again, your argument is an emotional one, not a rational one. It seems that your dislike of Tucker Carlson is one of the primary driving forces of your opposition.
Originally Posted by 7SecondsIt takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.
-
-
02-08-2024, 02:36 PM #29
60 Minutes would do it and it has made many interviews with our enemies and 60 Minutes is on the opposite side of the political spectrum than Tucker.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/syrian...on-60-minutes/
So, what makes these people different than Putin? All of the enemies above were given the chance to voice their positions/arguments.
Just because Tucker did the interview, it is wrong?Last edited by Mark1T; 02-08-2024 at 03:40 PM.
Helping one person may not change the world, but it could change the world for one person.
-
02-08-2024, 04:31 PM #30
Boom. Checkmate. This should be tattooed on the penis of every American 🇺🇸 Patriot with at least two functioning brain cells.
Gubmints, any gubmint, should never be trusted. Our gubmint is responsible for millions of deaths around the world. That’s a fact.
Statism is brain disease.
Anybody who thinks American politicians are innocent are just as brainless as JFK after his assassination.
Here’s the bottom line:
WWIII is here. Millions will die. Hyperinflation will crush the middle class.
What can we do to profit? Very few will and can answer this. Because many will fall for the distraction.This above all..
To thine ownself be true..
And it must follow, as the night the day..
Thou can'st not then be false to any man..
-----------------------------------------------
Bros, my Weightlifters and Powerlifters are my credentials.
Bookmarks