Trump says to blame the judges and court system if a terrorist attack happens

[RyanAintLying]

Same anti trump chumps crying in another thread

You'd be the same type of cuck during the American revolution bending over for the Brits.

"Guys stop crying, the British should be able to do whatever they want in our government. MAGA"

And then you'd wipe your chin and get off your knees

[RIKTER]

Same Judge that has done pro bono work for refugees...hmmm.

[moksha16]

It was Obama who listed them as countries of concern.

And? Did obama write an executive order baring those countries?



Trump wrote an executive order on the basis of security.. but used failed pres obamas total disaster list.. instead of crafting his own with countries that actually have attacked the US for a ban... why would he do that? Is he an idiot?

Did he need a list to know that the 9/11 attackers were mostly saudi's?

He claims to have "unreviewable power" to bar whomever he wants.. so why didn't he put ANY country's with people that have actually attacked the US.?

I'm sure it wasn't a ploy to ban a bunch of muslim countries and then claim it was Obama in talking points!!. Oh wait that is exactly what they have tried to do.. and failed... total loser. SAD!

[Shortfuze]

Trump is absolutely right. You can be all liberal hearted PC you want, but bad guys will take advantage of your kindness and attack without any remorse. And I wouldn't be surprised if libs blamed Trump for any future attack saying that his policies instigated terrorists to attack.

[moksha16]

Same Judge that has done pro bono work for refugees...hmmm.

Same president that said multiple times over the course of couple years on national television that he wanted a Muslim ban... hmmmmmmm

[holtmcg]

It was Obama who listed them as countries of concern.

You do realize that this argument doesn't help your case, right?

[Vrykul]

This ban was a bad and fruitless move by Trump, but it could be him being an idiot, or it could be him playing 4D alien space checkers again.

I'm not arguing for immigration, I'm just saying that those countries that he banned are not an issue because it's already next to impossible to come to the US from those countries.

[RIKTER]

Same president that said multiple times over the course of couple years on national television that he wanted a Muslim ban... hmmmmmmm

You're still calling this a muslim ban?

Do you think a gay person would have a case for not being hired because he is gay, when 87% of other gay applicants were hired?

[JoshSP1985]

Same president that said multiple times over the course of couple years on national television that he wanted a Muslim ban... hmmmmmmm

Well that would makes the most sense but it's not legal. A ban based around destabilized countries is though.

[JrM703]

...because the previous administration didn't blame Congress at every pitfall?

I really trust a judge in Washington that ended a court dialogue with his person belief, saying "Black Lives Matter."

Judges are suppose to be the antithesis of political, and simply interpret new law with pre-existing law.

[RyanAintLying]

Trump is absolutely right. You can be all liberal hearted PC you want, but bad guys will take advantage of your kindness and attack without any remorse. And I wouldn't be surprised if libs blamed Trump for any future attack saying that his policies instigated terrorists to attack.

Why should a judge be blamed for Trump's incompetence? The EO was poorly writted and enacted in a terrible fashion. The Department of Homeland Security didn't even know what to do or what was in the EO until after it was signed. That's on Trump, not the Judge forced to clean up the mess he created

[holtmcg]

This judge showed us that the checks and balances system is working properly. Why are you Republicans so up in arms about that?

[gixxer0.6g]

Name a terrorist that has attacked the United States from those 7 countries.



There is no spinning it.. they have no urgent threat and no precedent of terrorists from those countries... every country that has produced 1000's of american deaths they didn't put in the EO.. SO IT CAN'T BE ABOUT SECURITY.

Terrorism is easier to get through to the people than the actual truth that the refugees from those countries are full of welfare rapists. Look no further than europe.

1 billion Muslims want Sharia law. Do you know what Sharia law entails? That is the majority of them.
Of the 50 mil Muslim refugees in Europe, 80% are on some form of welfare.
In Sweeden, 77% of the rapes are coming from 2% of the population. Guess who?


If you, as an American went into the middle of the town in several of these countries on the ban list what do you think would happen? You'd be captured, tortured and killed. I don't know about you, but I'm in full support of this ban.

But unfortunately, it's "unconstitutional" to protect your country because you might hurt the feelings of a particular religion.

[NitrogenWidget]

Name a terrorist that has attacked the United States from those 7 countries.



There is no spinning it.. they have no urgent threat and no precedent of terrorists from those countries... every country that has produced 1000's of american deaths they didn't put in the EO.. SO IT CAN'T BE ABOUT SECURITY.

nice deflection.
So you admit Trump nor anyone else would build a hotel in those 7 countries for tourism.
Therefore your "trump has hotels in the countries not-banned" claim no longer holds water.


What about other countries?
Are you going to deny Terrorists from those 7 countries do not exist and do not carry out attacks on other nations of the world?

[Travis99]

Move

You don't deserve this country

Location: Colorado

[mTm]

San Francisco Police Department suspended participation with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...sm-task-force/

Last month, the Asian Law Caucus, the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ San Francisco Bay Area office and the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California sent a letter to San Francisco Police commissioners urging them to cease the department’s participation in the JTTF.

In the Jan. 5 letter, the groups speculate that, following President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the JTTF would likely increase surveillance of Muslim communities like the New York City police did after Sept. 11, 2001.

[VGmaster9]

3.. destroy confidence in the judiciary... check

You mean destroy the corruption of the judiciary.

[moksha16]

You're still calling this a muslim ban?

Do you think a gay person would have a case for not being hired because he is gay, when 87% of other gay applicants were hired?

LOL trump is the one that called it a muslim ban


its isn't a security ban.. he didn't ban any of the countries that have attacked the US.. how do you explain that?

[moksha16]

You mean destroy the corruption of the judiciary.

ya bro.. anyone that upholds the law against your dictator is corrupt.. even when he was put on the the bench by your party LOL at the true trumpcucks.

[moksha16]

nice deflection.
So you admit Trump nor anyone else would build a hotel in those 7 countries for tourism.
Therefore your "trump has hotels in the countries not-banned" claim no longer holds water.


What about other countries?
Are you going to deny Terrorists from those 7 countries do not exist and do not carry out attacks on other nations of the world?

Are you going to explain why Saudi Arabia was not banned with Donald J Trumps "un reviewable authority" ?

[moksha16]

Terrorism is easier to get through to the people than the actual truth that the refugees from those countries are full of welfare rapists. Look no further than europe.

1 billion Muslims want Sharia law. Do you know what Sharia law entails? That is the majority of them.
Of the 50 mil Muslim refugees in Europe, 80% are on some form of welfare.
In Sweeden, 77% of the rapes are coming from 2% of the population. Guess who?


If you, as an American went into the middle of the town in several of these countries on the ban list what do you think would happen? You'd be captured, tortured and killed. I don't know about you, but I'm in full support of this ban.

But unfortunately, it's "unconstitutional" to protect your country because you might hurt the feelings of a particular religion.

I'm so confused.. i thought this wasn't a muslim ban LOL.. why don't you trumpers huddle up and decide once and for all?

[VGmaster9]

ya bro.. anyone that upholds the law against your dictator is corrupt.. even when he was put on the the bench by your party LOL at the true trumpcucks.

So I guess by your logic, protecting the American people from another Paris-esque attack is being a dictator.

[holtmcg]

You mean destroy the corruption of the judiciary.

Lolwut? This is well within his power as a judge. It goes to show that our checks and balances system is working properly. If anything, republicans should be perfectly okay with this.

[gixxer0.6g]

I'm so confused.. i thought this wasn't a muslim ban LOL.. why don't you trumpers huddle up and decide once and for all?

Typical lib response. Can't deny facts so lets make it about religion.

[moksha16]

Typical lib response. Can't deny facts so lets make it about religion.

You

refugees from those countries are full of welfare rapists. Look no further than europe.

1 billion Muslims want Sharia law. Do you know what Sharia law entails? That is the majority of them.
Of the 50 mil Muslim refugees in Europe, 80% are on some form of welfare.
In Sweeden, 77% of the rapes are coming from 2% of the population. Guess who?

also LOL at you trumper *******s unable to defend your nonsensical positions

Thread: Trump says to blame the...
I hope this doesn't hurt your feelings snowflake

LMFAO! ok snowflake, it seems your feels got hurt though. LOL

[sclimb]

You are entitled to you incorrect opinion.. you are not entitled to your incorrect facts.

A ban based on security, Saudi Arabia should be the first country on the list PERIOD.

We can call Saudi Arabia to vet anyone in question.

We can not call ISIL to vet anyone in question.

[sclimb]

Trump wrote an executive order on the basis of security.. but used failed pres obamas total disaster list.. instead of crafting his own with countries that actually have attacked the US for a ban... why would he do that? Is he an idiot?

The past is not the present and the present is not the future. If you make decisions based on what happened in the past instead of what will happen in the future, you're a "reactionary" instead of proactive, and you will lose.

Imagine you're in the NBA and your next matchup is against the LA Lakers. Do you fly to LA or do you fly to NY because you played against the Knicks last week? You'd fly out to NY and wonder where your team is. That's the level of intelligence you're displaying here.

[JrM703]

Moksha is the R/P board idiot...

-Sudan is where Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda trained prior to 9/11
-****lia has Islamic-Extremists backed by Iran that just bombed a Saudi Naval Vessel, on top of the pirating off their shores
-Yemen is where Al-Qaeda has reorganized
-Syria is a hot bed for every Islamic-Extremist and Militant Organization
-Libya is where a U.S. ambassador was murdered
-Iraq is where ISIS infrastructure is
-Iran funnels money to anti-US militant organizations, and is currently firing missiles at our Navy

Saudi's are helping U.S. in Syria and Yemen, inconvenient truths, I know.

You're such a bonehead, Mokshah, start reading a book a day on world history and foreign relations.

[zinkhan99]

Facts are triggering, aren't they you precious little snowflake?

Why would the fact that liberals have double standards and no backbone trigger me? You can do absolutely nothing about it other than cry and whine like you already do. It's rather hilarious and one of the minor reasons people voted for Trump to see the mass meltdown happening. It doesn't trigger me in the slightest that you admit that the EO would be fine, but not when Trump and Bannon introduces it. Just shows how stupid and weak your narrative is.

[CalmWind]

Liberals have handed Trump another Win.

When another terrorist attack happens :

- Trump will blame the liberals for hampering his efforts to protect ourselves (the ban, etc)

- The country will agree with Trump

- Trump will have renewed political capital to run roughshod with new policies