ive been doing chest/biceps and back/triceps together like that for a few months now.. ive been told that its better this way because with chest--the triceps lose a lot of power after doing the chest and same thing with back and biceps.. but i still see a lot of people doing chest/tris and back/bis.. what have you guys seen better results with?
|
|
View Poll Results: Chest/Tri's --OR-- Chest/Bi's.. which have you had better results with?
- Voters
- 15. You may not vote on this poll
-
Chest/Tri's
6 40.00% -
Chest/Bi's
7 46.67% -
Don't work either together
2 13.33%
Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
09-27-2005, 07:48 PM #1Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: Long Island, NY
- Age: 40
- Posts: 338
- Rep Power: 0
Chest/Tri's --OR-- Chest/Bi's.. which have you had better results with?
Last edited by obstakleone; 09-27-2005 at 07:51 PM.
-
09-27-2005, 10:12 PM #2Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2005
- Posts: 17
- Rep Power: 0
dont do either together train biceps with hamstrings and calves and triceps with shoulders for me this has given me the best results by far
-
09-27-2005, 11:15 PM #3
I've done both ways. Had success with both.
I prefer chest/bi and back/tri because with that split the bis and tris get worked more often, which is good because they generally recover quicker than larger muscles
Bookmarks