Banned by ******** & instagram

[nn586]

What exactly did PJW do to get banned?

[Tears]

Went outside groupthink. We will soon enter an age where you’ll be monitored 24/7 and criminally charged if you go against what you’re told to think.

[miscinbro]

Went outside groupthink. We will soon enter an age where you’ll be monitored 24/7 and criminally charged if you go against what you’re told to think.

By private companies? Say the celltech word around here and see what happens.

[nn586]

By private companies? Say the celltech word around here and see what happens.

Private company who has 1.74 billion mobile active users and is led by castrated leftists who are against anyone that is conservative or supports Trump

[LieutenantGains]

Lmao, conservatives hate liberals but sure do love using the massively successful private platforms created by them.

FB basically said "Go be a ******* somewhere else".

[miscinbro]

Private company who has 1.74 billion mobile active users and is led by castrated leftists who are against anyone that is conservative or supports Trump

Let's assume all that is true, what's your solution?

[sandaltan]

who cares? ******** is a private company who can ban whoever they want, whenever they want, for literally no reason at all.

so can bb.com and any other private social media platform

nobody has a right to use ********

[sandaltan]

Private company who has 1.74 billion mobile active users and is led by castrated leftists who are against anyone that is conservative or supports Trump

are you angry that fb banned you after calling their leaders castrated leftists?

[Tears]

who cares? ******** is a private company who can ban whoever they want, whenever they want, for literally no reason at all.

so can bb.com and any other private social media platform

nobody has a right to use ********

As usual, you fail to see the broader picture.

It makes no difference. You’ll understand one day

[ooph]

Lmao, conservatives hate liberals but sure do love using the massively successful private platforms created by them.

FB basically said "Go be a ******* somewhere else".

I love how ****ing retarded this poster is. Like the guy is a ****ing moron.

Has no grasp on what a "public forum" is or the protections that come along with it.

You moron, you don't grasp how FB/IG/Twitter constantly claim they are a "public forum" which gives them protections from lawsuits etc. YET They do things that go completely against their claim. You're either a public forum or a private company and you accept the pros/cons that come along with that. You don't get to pick and choose which benefits from which you want.


**** you're retarded bro. every god damn post you make is just ****ing idiotic. What is wrong with you?

[cashinout]

who cares? ******** is a private company who can ban whoever they want, whenever they want, for literally no reason at all.

so can bb.com and any other private social media platform

nobody has a right to use ********

then why can't you sue ******** for the content people post on there?

[gachase21]

******** bans extremist leaders including Louis Farrakhan, Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos for being ‘dangerous’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/techn...ing-dangerous/

[miscinbro]

I love how ****ing retarded this poster is. Like the guy is a ****ing moron.

Has no grasp on what a "public forum" is or the protections that come along with it.

You moron, you don't grasp how FB/IG/Twitter constantly claim they are a "public forum" which gives them protections from lawsuits etc. YET They do things that go completely against their claim. You're either a public forum or a private company and you accept the pros/cons that come along with that. You don't get to pick and choose which benefits from which you want.

What the fck are you talking about? You understand this is United States law right?

[Noliberals4]

who cares? ******** is a private company who can ban whoever they want, whenever they want, for literally no reason at all.

so can bb.com and any other private social media platform

nobody has a right to use ********

If this is the case, then why is it such an issue if Russia posts memes on those websites?

[stevenbaker2055]

Lmao, conservatives hate liberals but sure do love using the massively successful private platforms created by them.

FB basically said "Go be a ******* somewhere else".

Why do people like this call these creators liberal? They all are libertarians in their private life but pretend to be socialists

[miscinbro]

then why can't you sue ******** for the content people post on there?

Because content providers are not deemed responsible for every stupid ass statement users make. However, they are allowed to censor whatever they like.

[nn586]

who cares? ******** is a private company who can ban whoever they want, whenever they want, for literally no reason at all.

so can bb.com and any other private social media platform

nobody has a right to use ********

A slave used to have no right to be free.

You're a sheep. baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

are you angry that fb banned you after calling their leaders castrated leftists?

I don't post on ********.

[miscinbro]

A slave used to have no right to be free.

You're a sheep. baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

What do you propose to solve this slavery-level problem?

[nn586]

What do you propose to solve this slavery-level problem?

Ban channels that are actually racist and actually promote hate speech?

PJW is not racist and does not promote hate speech, he's a conservative with views that most conservatives agree with.

[miscinbro]

Ban channels that are actually racist and actually promote hate speech?

PJW is not racist and does not promote hate speech, he's a conservative with views that most conservatives agree with.

Ok, so who tells Youtube who they can and can't ban? ... You?

[Tears]

Ok, so who tells Youtube who they can and can't ban? ... You?

A governing body will soon. Don’t you worry your pretty little head.

[miscinbro]

A governing body will soon. Don’t you worry your pretty little head.

The government will determine what we can say? Yea, actually that would worry me.

[miscinbro]

I love how ****ing retarded this poster is. Like the guy is a ****ing moron.

Has no grasp on what a "public forum" is or the protections that come along with it.

You moron, you don't grasp how FB/IG/Twitter constantly claim they are a "public forum" which gives them protections from lawsuits etc. YET They do things that go completely against their claim. You're either a public forum or a private company and you accept the pros/cons that come along with that. You don't get to pick and choose which benefits from which you want.


**** you're retarded bro. every god damn post you make is just ****ing idiotic. What is wrong with you?

I'm going to bump this because you can't be more wrong about US law. Every insult you hurled in this post applies to you in spades.

[cashinout]

Because content providers are not deemed responsible for every stupid ass statement users make. However, they are allowed to censor whatever they like.

if they are content providers, then they can be sued for the content they provide

[miscinbro]

if they are content providers, then they can be sued for the content they provide

If you want to change the law, please, go ahead and try. I'm talking about current reality here.

[LieutenantGains]

lmao

You have no goddamn idea what you're talking about.

Since fb/twitter/etc can serve as a space for government officials to engage w/the public, a limited public forum where first amendment rights apply exists. Hence why the president can't block people on twitter anymore (Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump)(lmao). The government can't infringe on your constitutional right to engage with it.

However

When you're a private individual like this potato:



Who, mind you, doesn't even have US Citizenship/the inherent right to first amendment protections

You aren't protected by 1A rights on a private platform since you as a private citizen, are only protected by 1A if you engage with a public official. First amendment only protects the relationship between you and the government. A private individual addressing other private individuals on a private platform, can absolutely be told to f*ck off by that private platform for whatever reason the platform deems justified.

Stay in your lane, boyo.

[Noliberals4]

l
Who, mind you, doesn't even have US Citizenship/the inherent right to first amendment protections

but illegal aliens do?

l
You aren't protected by 1A rights on a private platform since you as a private citizen, are only protected by 1A if you engage with a public official. First amendment only protects the relationship between you and the government. A private individual addressing other private individuals on a private platform, can absolutely be told to f*ck off by a private platform.

Stay in your lane, boyo.

Then why is it a problem if Russia uses it?

[cashinout]

If you want to change the law, please, go ahead and try. I'm talking about current reality here.

the current reality is that ******** executives can influence elections as they see fit and you seem to have no problem with it because it's only happening to hur dur right wingers

[mglover92]

um, so what was the reason for being banned? Did they even give one?

[miscinbro]

the current reality is that ******** executives can influence elections as they see fit and you seem to have no problem with it because it's only happening to hur dur right wingers

I seem to understand the 1st Amendment.