Official Narrative of Key Bridge Totally Fake, Approach Was from SW, Then Hard Right

[chicagopizzaboy]

Well damn if this ain't convincing. The official narrative of the path is not even close. You can see the ship is coming from the south at an angle, not from the north, running parallel to bridge. It may have steamed down from the north but at some point it maneuvered well to the west of the support column.

The official map was all ready to go before the attack and got imprinted in the major media. But this is so obvious. They needed to make sure the bridge column was lined up with the bow dead center, no glancing blow. The ship turns hard rudder-right, stops to steady, then rams full power into the target. It was planned, deliberate, slow methodical sabotage. This bridge is critical to the nation's food supply chain, farm machinery and fertilizer imports. You are under attack.

Just like Hermann Goering said. If you are going to lie, LIE BIG. People don't know how to respond to that.

Youtube box:

The true final approach path of the Dali is nothing like that portrayed in media illustrations, which have it drifting down from the northwest with a very slight angle into the bridge. Observe that the ship was moving parallel to the bridge in the final minutes, in a northeast direction before regaining power for the second time, turning hard rudder-right until the bow was aimed at the column, then throttling head-on into the bridge. It is clear it was not an accident.

Official Narrative of Dali Totally Fake, Final Approach Was from Southwest, Then Turned Hard Right


Official video source WRAL News Raleigh: Video at official WRAL Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JebyNOvJmCM


CNN graphic

[chicagopizzaboy]

Challenge to Deep State shills: prove it wrong. Crickets.

[nutsy54]

Holy crap, how many lies can you tell in one post? Coming from the southwest?! Absolutely nothing in that video shows a ship moving from the southwest

Not to mention, any approach "from the southwest" would've grounded the ship when it moved outside the channel.
https://www.charts.noaa.gov/PDFs/12281.pdf

Let me guess - you haven't even done the geometry to figure out where that camera would be located, and what relative angles (with zero depth perception) it would show, or where the deep channel actually exists...

And of course you conveniently use a time-lapse video in that dramatically speeds up motion (while omitting that fact from the actual video content).

This bridge is critical to the nation's food supply chain, farm machinery and fertilizer imports. You are under attack.

Really? How has the nation's food supply and farm machinery been impacted? A main channel will be re-opened by next week... what do you think will happen between now and then as part of this "attack"?

What's there to "prove wrong"? You posted some baseless crap, baseless claims with no proof of their own.

[chicagopizzaboy]

Holy crap, how many lies can you tell in one post? Coming from the southwest?! Absolutely nothing in that video shows a ship moving from the southwest

Not to mention, any approach "from the southwest" would've grounded the ship when it moved outside the channel.
https://www.charts.noaa.gov/PDFs/12281.pdf

Let me guess - you haven't even done the geometry to figure out where that camera would be located, and what relative angles (with zero depth perception) it would show, or where the deep channel actually exists...

And of course you conveniently use a time-lapse video in that dramatically speeds up motion (while omitting that fact from the actual video content).


Really? How has the nation's food supply and farm machinery been impacted? A main channel will be re-opened by next week... what do you think will happen between now and then as part of this "attack"?

What's there to "prove wrong"? You posted some baseless crap, baseless claims with no proof of their own.

Use your eyes.

[chicagopizzaboy]

Holy crap, how many lies can you tell in one post? Coming from the southwest?! Absolutely nothing in that video shows a ship moving from the southwest

Not to mention, any approach "from the southwest" would've grounded the ship when it moved outside the channel.
https://www.charts.noaa.gov/PDFs/12281.pdf

Let me guess - you haven't even done the geometry to figure out where that camera would be located, and what relative angles (with zero depth perception) it would show, or where the deep channel actually exists...

And of course you conveniently use a time-lapse video in that dramatically speeds up motion (while omitting that fact from the actual video content).


Really? How has the nation's food supply and farm machinery been impacted? A main channel will be re-opened by next week... what do you think will happen between now and then as part of this "attack"?

What's there to "prove wrong"? You posted some baseless crap, baseless claims with no proof of their own.

The bridge runs SW to NE. The boat is in full profile moving parallel to the bridge, passing behind a left support column.

[nutsy54]

Use your eyes.

Use your eyes and brain and a nautical chart of Baltimore Harbor (which I provided). Just because you don't understand optics and parallax, doesn't mean your ridiculous claims are true.

Please, explain how a ship with 40-50' draft managed to slide right through 25-35' water?

You're falsely assuming the camera is lined up directly at a right angle to the center of the bridge. Completely false. It's several miles to the west of that perpendicular (and 3-4 miles away straight-line distance). Which means any ship approaching the bridge from the port will appear to be moving from left-to-right in the camera view. Which is not the same as, moving parallel to the bridge.

- You claim all AIS data is false, with no proof it's false.
- You don't understand optics from the camera position, so just make up a lie who hope nobody will challenge (oops).
- You don't understand how to read nautical charts which prove it's physical impossible for the ship to move through the water depths claimed.

[chicagopizzaboy]

Use your eyes and brain and a nautical chart of Baltimore Harbor (which I provided). Just because you don't understand optics and parallax, doesn't mean your ridiculous claims are true.

Please, explain how a ship with 40-50' draft managed to slide right through 25-35' water?

You're falsely assuming the camera is lined up directly at a right angle to the center of the bridge. Completely false. It's several miles to the west of that perpendicular (and 3-4 miles away straight-line distance). Which means any ship approaching the bridge from the port will appear to be moving from left-to-right in the camera view. Which is not the same as, moving parallel to the bridge.

- You claim all AIS data is false, with no proof it's false.
- You don't understand optics from the camera position, so just make up a lie who hope nobody will challenge (oops).
- You don't understand how to read nautical charts which prove it's physical impossible for the ship to move through the water depths claimed.

Total bullsht. On the path described by the media the ship never passes directly behind the set of support columns to the left of the doomed support structure, then turns a hard 90 degree angle right. It comes down from NW then turns a shallow 10 or 15 degrees right.

We can see the ship swinging around to the right after it regains power the second time. It pauses as power goes out again, drifting into a head-on angle perpendicular to the bridge. The it throttles forward. Clear as day no matter your "parallax view" gaslighting. So exactly where are you saying the camera is positioned? Show it on your chart or the illustration, unless you are too computer illiterate

[Seatard]

Total bullsht. On the path described by the media the ship never passes directly behind the set of support columns to the left of the doomed support structure, then turns a hard 90 degree angle right. It comes down from NW then turns a shallow 10 or 15 degrees right.

We can see the ship swinging around to the right after it regains power the second time. It pauses as power goes out again, drifting into a head-on angle perpendicular to the bridge. The it throttles forward. Clear as day no matter your "parallax view" gaslighting. So exactly where are you saying the camera is positioned? Show it on your chart or the illustration, unless you are too computer illiterate

The camera is located at a house on Bay Rd. in Riviera Beach. From that angle all of the ships leaving the terminal through the channel would appear to pass behind the set of support columns to the left of the doomed support structure.

You are a very, very bad conspiracy theorist. One of the worst to ever try.

[nutsy54]

Total bullsht. On the path described by the media the ship never passes directly behind the set of support columns to the left of the doomed support structure, then turns a hard 90 degree angle right. It comes down from NW then turns a shallow 10 or 15 degrees right.

A. Your ridiculous claim that the camera is sitting dead-center of the channel, at a 90 degree angle to the bridge, is baseless and completely laughable to anyone who knows how to read a map.
B. Your claim that the ship with a 40-50 foot draft magically sailed through 25-35 feet of water is baseless and completely laughable to anyone who knows how to read a nautical chart.

Your entire premise is based on making up an easily disproven lie about where the camera is located, and an easily disproven lie about water depth & ship's draft. Let me guess, you haven't even looked at any other videos from that camera, taken before or after the collision? You haven't actually looked at a map of the area to determine what viewing angle is actually available?

Repeating the same lie over and over again, doesn't make it true. Damn, at this point most conspiracy theorists just change their story and move on to a different lie

[nutsy54]

The camera is somewhere in the orange oval. The sightline extends to the iconic white cranes that are visible in current camera views (which is also where the ship initially departed), and your video. Anything departing the Port of Baltimore, in the channel, will appear to the to the left of the bridge truss that was hit, until it crosses under the bridge.

[nutsy54]

Yet another failed Conspiracy Theory, based on lies and fiction. An "attack" with no real impact as claimed...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebKZXGgOVfY

"Fourth temporary channel to open around Key Bridge collapse site"

Hey OP: When you start with a "conclusion", then grasp at any lies or false information to "prove" that conclusion, while intentionally ignoring all Facts that readily disprove your conclusion... your conclusion is wrong.

[Cleveland33]

so has anyone confirmed who was at the helm at the time? Was it the ship's crew or the harbor master?

[Seatard]

so has anyone confirmed who was at the helm at the time? Was it the ship's crew or the harbor master?

Everything I've read said the harbor pilot was "at the helm". But they don't actually physically take the controls, they just give direction to the ship's crew and make radio calls.

[chicagopizzaboy]

so has anyone confirmed who was at the helm at the time? Was it the ship's crew or the harbor master?

The Dali crew was confined to ship for weeks and still has not spoken to media, per orders I'm sure. The feds needed that time to make sure they knew what they had to say to get the official story straight. It wouldn't do to have them blabbing something like the ship was not responding to controls we were hacked.

The dead giveaway is that power went on at the moment it starts to turn hard right directly at the bridge column. That was no "drift" that was rudder. The idea that the rudder was not working because of power loss is hogwash.

[nutsy54]

The Dali crew was confined to ship for weeks and still has not spoken to media, per orders I'm sure. The feds needed that time to make sure they knew what they had to say to get the official story straight. It wouldn't do to have them blabbing something like the ship was not responding to controls we were hacked.

The dead giveaway is that power went on at the moment it starts to turn hard right directly at the bridge column. That was no "drift" that was rudder. The idea that the rudder was not working because of power loss is hogwash.

So your baseless theory has been completely shredded and disproven, but you're sticking with it?

[nutsy54]

This bridge is critical to the nation's food supply chain, farm machinery and fertilizer imports. You are under attack.

What's it like being so laughably WRONG all the time, on every topic?

The port re-opened weeks ago. The Dali has been moved from the crash site. The deep-draft tunnel will be fully restored in a few weeks. No disruption to the food supply, no disruption to farm machinery, no disruption to fertilizer. Just irrational rantings form the predictable conspiracy crowd

[nutsy54]

This bridge is critical to the nation's food supply chain, farm machinery and fertilizer imports. You are under attack.

Another swing and a miss...

An "attack" on the nation's food supply, farm machinery, and fertilizer... which didn't really impact any of those things, and for which no real proof of an "attack" has been provided. Ships were redirected, port facilities outside the bridge perimeter were put into use, most shipping has been actively using restricted or one-way channels for nearly two months. And now:

UPDATE 36: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announces full restoration of Baltimore's Fort McHenry Federal Channel

"Monday, June 10, 2024

BALTIMORE – As part of the Unified Command response to the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Navy Supervisor of Salvage and Diving today restored the Fort McHenry Federal Channel to its original operational dimensions of 700 feet wide and 50 feet deep for commercial maritime transit through the Port of Baltimore."
https://www.keybridgeresponse2024.co...-mchenry-feder