Reply
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5
Results 121 to 122 of 122
  1. #121
    Registered physio(almost) wjs010's Avatar
    Join Date: Mar 2012
    Age: 35
    Posts: 1,344
    Rep Power: 686
    wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500) wjs010 is a jewel in the rough. (+500)
    wjs010 is offline
    Originally Posted by res.ume View Post
    Isn't obama trying to raise taxes for himself through the buffet rule?
    Well it is presumed that if it is renamed the Reagan rule, conservatives would cling to it. Buffet rule was 28%. I think. Regan rule was 30%In 2011 obama made 790,000 and he paid 23% dammit can't remember. He is paying way higher than some obviously
    Reply With Quote

  2. #122
    Random Words nutsy54's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2003
    Location: United States
    Posts: 124,812
    Rep Power: 185174
    nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000) nutsy54 has a reputation beyond repute. Second best rank possible! (+100000)
    nutsy54 is offline
    Originally Posted by saloman View Post
    Does Obama need to raise taxes on himself to propose a tax increase for those even more wealthy than him? Of course not. That would be stupid to suggest he did. Right? Yo Nutsy, spin dat sheyit.
    Since you felt the bizarre need to troll a totally irrelevant thread with your falsified question, I guess I'll post the response here...



    Obama clearly promised to implement tax increases for himself, then turned around and did the exact opposite with his "Buffet Rule" proposal that conveniently doesn't apply to him based on income, even though he meets the criteria of paying a higher rate than his secretary.

    Barack Obama: "...we need to change our tax code so that people like me, and an awful lot of members of Congress, pay our fair share of taxes".

    BRB - "people like me"... as long as it's not "me"
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts