Not at all. Just calling it like it is. You otoh seem a tad butthurt.
Quote me where I said she had NO right to. But with who? That's the point. She's going to have to lie to any normal male she meets, ie, her past actions DO have consequences for her. Capiche? And if she lies to a man about who she is in order to "trap" him, then how is that right? Or fair? She is depriving him the opportunity to meet a woman more appropriate for him. She could be wasting YEARS of his life. And because she thinks she has the "right" to a fairytale relationship or some crap? Like some modern princess with a bloated sense of entitlement?
"tough guy" wat? And LOL at "recreational gangbang", like it's just the same as a game of Scrabble. Or Badminton or something LOL!
"Nice game of ping-pong, Sally. Fancy a quadruple penetration gang-bang while my Golden Retriever shts on you now?"
The point of the example was to compare her behaviours with similarly socially unacceptable sexual behaviours. A distinction which has eluded your
epic logic.
Again this delusion of moral equivalence that WK's, Womyn's Rights Tards, and Liberalists are all infected with.
Bro. You're a White Knight. A turtleneck sweater wearing White Knight.
Apparently not. And that's just it. A woman like this has to live a lie to be in a relationship with a normal male, or find a male of equally low moral fabric who won't have a problem with his woman "recreationally" (LOL!) letting 3 or 4 guys bang every hole in her body at once. Max Hardcore for example? Or perhaps you, since you apparently have no issues with anything a female has done before she met you, be it gangbangs, bestiality, scat, bukkake.
She's all yours nintendo....
Bookmarks