|
-
05-16-2024, 07:03 PM #661
-
05-16-2024, 07:05 PM #662
^Dassit.
CNN lib journalists calling out Michael Cohen for being a pathological liar during cross-examination
Watch clip:
https://twitter.com/jeffstorobinsky/...49755587789100
Political commentator Alyssa Farah Griffin said Thursday on CNN’s coverage of former President Donald Trump’s business record trial that witness Michael Cohen after the defense lawyer Todd Blanche’s cross-examination.
Anchor Jake Tapper said, “Michael Cohen says he never sought a job at the white house. Bryan Lanza here who worked on the 2016 campaign, says, that’s not true. He recalls Michael Cohen wanting to be White House council. We have some journalists on our panel here saying that’s not true. They were recalling Michael Cohen saying he was going to join the White House. He was very excited to do so.”
He asked, “Tell me, what do you think?”
Former Trump administration staffer Alyssa Farah Griffin said, “I was working for a number of Republican lawmakers at that time, several of whom would go into the administration, including Mick Mulvaney as OMB director, and it was widely known and believed. Now, Michael Cohen never told me firsthand, ‘I’m going into the White House, I want to.’ But it was widely discussed that he was angling for Attorney General or to be White House counsel. That’s, I mean, there’s dozens and dozens of people around Washington who could corroborate that. My jaw hit the floor when I heard him denying that.”
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024...ing-testimony/
-
05-16-2024, 07:07 PM #663
-
05-16-2024, 07:10 PM #664
-
-
05-16-2024, 07:16 PM #665
So, even if that is preferred, is this the hill to die on to charge a former president? The flimsiest of novel legal theory months before an upcoming election when others have already declined to prosecute because there was nothing there?
Hell, most politicians have far more egregious issues. Clinton hid payments through her law firm under “legal expenses” which were used to pay foreign operatives for fake dirt in her opponent, which was leaked to the media and intel to sway the election. Pretty sure Clinton and the dnc paid a small fine.
-
05-16-2024, 07:23 PM #666
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,446
- Rep Power: 76338
OK, sticking to the topic, yes, I have my doubts as to whether he'll be convicted, it all seems a bit nebulous to me, but simply coding them as Ex Gratia would have avoided all this. Do that, there's no fraud (Hi Michael, such a good guy, here's some bonus money), and as such can't be attached to campaign finance violations.
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
-
05-16-2024, 07:34 PM #667
How can it be a campaign finance violation when it wasn’t campaign funds nor an event that could only exist for the purpose of the campaign? Completely illogical.
On the tape they played, trump mentioned paying cash and cohen insisted that “he had it.” Seems like trump deferred in these cases to his lawyer, who legally should have known how to handle these situations. If there is an issue, it’s on Cohen, not trump. But there isn’t even an issue.
-
05-16-2024, 07:42 PM #668
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,446
- Rep Power: 76338
No, there obviously is an issue - they were coded as legal expenses, which they are not - it's the hook used to tie it all into campaign finance violations. I'll admit, I'm no expert on US campaign finance law, but like I said before, if it was a case of "it's simply not applicable", it's a slam dunk for the defense, so if it's not, then I have to think there's more nuance to the issue.
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
-
-
05-16-2024, 07:54 PM #669
The judge wouldn’t let the head of the fec testify that no campaign finance laws were broken. How’s that for prejudice?
Even a jury pool selected from over 90% democrats find trump guilty (hell, most likely have zero clue what the allegation even is, but are more than happy to find him guilty), it would easily be overturned on appeal. There have been so many missteps by the judge since the start. A reasonable judge would have tossed this out before it ever got to trial. The other cases are egregious in their own right, but this one far and away takes the cake.
Your blind faith that there must be something there is putting faith in a failed and weaponized judiciary. There is nothing there. It’s lawfare.
-
05-16-2024, 08:14 PM #670
Anyone post that Bill Mahr interview with Stormy back in 2018 stating Trump did nothing wrong with her and it was completely CONSENSUAL,,was not coerced..
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/sta...39552539549765
-
05-16-2024, 08:31 PM #671
-
05-16-2024, 08:34 PM #672
-
-
05-17-2024, 05:44 AM #673
Cohen yesterday said on the stand that the hush money agreement was a "perfectly legal contract"
https://nypost.com/2024/05/16/us-new...photos-more-2/
-
05-17-2024, 05:47 AM #674
-
05-17-2024, 07:04 AM #675
-
05-20-2024, 07:45 AM #676
-
-
05-20-2024, 07:49 AM #677
-
05-20-2024, 07:58 AM #678
-
05-20-2024, 08:07 AM #679
-
05-20-2024, 08:13 AM #680
-
-
05-20-2024, 08:20 AM #681
-
05-20-2024, 08:51 AM #682
The main issue with cohen is that the dems gave him by the balls. When mueller went after him they got him on tax violations related to another business venture. They threatened to loop in his wife and family if he didn’t plea. They got him to put the campaign finance bs into the plea as well. He’s pissed trump didn’t pardon him. And he’s still out on house arrest and they could lock him back up at any time. So he is a puppet for them.
-
05-20-2024, 08:58 AM #683
-
05-20-2024, 09:08 AM #684
-
-
05-20-2024, 09:54 AM #685
There were many issues with mail in votes, chain of custody, states breaking their own election laws, etc.
We should make Election Day a national holiday, make all voting in person except for rare exceptions, and require ID. No mass harvesting of ballots, no other nonsense. The results would be available the same day.
Right now we have a system where someone like trump needs to win by at least a 4-6% margin to exceed shenanigans that states can pull. And our elections are all close.
-
05-20-2024, 09:57 AM #686
-
05-20-2024, 10:07 AM #687
-
05-20-2024, 10:54 AM #688
Typo aside I’m clearly going out of my way to say I don’t know what will happen with the case. But I do stand by my assertion that the DA didn’t just do it for the hell of it. Nobody wants a giant L on their scoresheet that, literally, the entire world is paying attention to.
I’ve been behind the bench enough times to know this is unpredictable. DAs don’t do this for the hell of it, and that’s actually a violation of their ethical oaths are attorneys.Last edited by miscinbro; 05-20-2024 at 10:59 AM.
-
-
05-20-2024, 11:53 AM #689
-
05-20-2024, 11:55 AM #690
Bookmarks