gooby pls
as a german I would have to say that the us would win a conventional war pretty easily. nuclear war would just make both sides loose.
However, if each side got a few years time to prepare for a conventional war -> goodnight sweet usa
This isnt even about the 400m more poor easterners that europe has, its about the massive wealth of germany + france + uk + italy + spain +russia combined
|
-
06-06-2012, 05:28 PM #511Want to build a <$600 PC that can max any game?
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=146443603
Gaming PC for less than $400 + balancing of components:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=148783303
-
06-06-2012, 05:56 PM #512He who lets the world, or his own portion of it, choose his plan of life for him, has no need of any other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation. He who chooses his plan for himself, employs all his faculties. He must use observation to see, reasoning and judgment to foresee, activity to gather materials for decision, discrimination to decide, and when he has decided, firmness and self-control to hold to his deliberate decision.
-
-
06-06-2012, 06:04 PM #513
No. If no nukes, usa would have trouble conquering germany alone. What you have said is nonsense. The american army is highly overrated imo. This does not imply that i dissrespect any american soldier, i honestly do not believe they would be able to gain control of us. Inb4 ww2... Wasnt just usa, noobs. If anything, russia did it.
My list of interesting/thought provoking movies:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=171136501
"We do not have to visit a madhouse to find disordered minds; our planet is the mental institution of the universe."
"Everybody makes his own god."
-
06-06-2012, 06:12 PM #514
-
06-06-2012, 06:26 PM #515
Hopefully everyone in here is aware that nuclear war is not an option for either side of any conflict as it assure mutual destruction. DURR HURR missile defence! Missile defence doesn't work worth for ****. It's an extremely expensive piece of ****. Sure it might be able to take out a couple nukes but any large quantity of nukes or any missiles that can evade missile defence (split into multiple warheads, swerve, etc.) So nuclear warfare just is out of the question.
-
06-06-2012, 06:31 PM #516
-
-
06-06-2012, 06:50 PM #517
-
06-07-2012, 02:11 AM #518
i dont think logistically europe could mobilize enough troops to take the USA neither do i think USA have anywhere enough troops to occupy and hold europe if they somehow won. USA would maybe be ahead at the start but the american economy would be pretty stressed not to mention how europe has vast more resources to tap in.
But basically china wins from the trillions being borrowed.
-
06-07-2012, 04:55 AM #519
all the US has to do is fly a propeller plane over France to make them surrender.
brb Europe one country down.
what will Europe do when our undetectable b-2's are carpet bombing your major city's in the dead of night? the number of country's you have that can put up any reasonable fight would dwindle fast. it would be a domino effect at that point.
Europe has no capabilities of attacking US on its own soil. If your Naval forces are even lucky to make it out of your harbors, you'd still never make it to US waters before being obliterated.Last edited by Lord_Lemon; 06-07-2012 at 06:09 AM.
-
06-07-2012, 05:01 AM #520
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: Wales, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 34
- Posts: 2,606
- Rep Power: 462
Undetectable? Strong lack of understanding of "stealth". Even the USA know their aircraft are detectable which is why they've almost planned attack routes around radar installations. Heck, even the serbs splashed a F117.
Europe has no capabilities of attacking US on its own soil. If your Naval forces are even lucky to make it out of your harbors, you'd still never make it to US waters before being obliterated.
However, in terms of landing forces then yes, there's no way Europe could launch an "invasion". Wouldn't even get to the central Atlantic.
-
-
06-07-2012, 05:10 AM #521
lol @ u thinking that india and australia would ally with europe over the US. "The Commonwealth" means absolutely nothing to anyone outside of the UK. The moment the monarchy or the governor general tried to exert any authority wed be a republic before you could finish the order.
A biscuit always pays his reps.
**** you whitey, no gracios Jeff
~Sex Offender Crew~
***Lost my house trading FOREX crew***
-
06-07-2012, 05:21 AM #522
-
06-07-2012, 05:23 AM #523
-
06-07-2012, 05:31 AM #524
-
-
06-07-2012, 05:43 AM #525
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Location: Manchester, New Hampshire, United States
- Posts: 8,224
- Rep Power: 48524
US population: 300mil
EU population: 700mil
Rough estimates, Russia is NOT A part of europe to the retard on page 1 that suggested it was.
US Aircraft Carriers: 11+9 amphibious assault ships with carrier capabilities
EU Aircraft Carriers: 6
Total US troops: 3-3.5mil(145mil fighting age and everyone has guns)
Total EU troops: 5-10mil(350mil fighting age and half have guns)
US Nukes: enough to flatten Europe.
EU Nukes: not enough to flatten Texas, unless the Ukraine is hiding a bunch of old soviet ones.
The US also has considerably better training, more experience, better tech, they control most of the worlds communications, and Russia/China would probably ally with them due to the fact they benefit them more.
Stupid thread is stupid."There is no reason to be alive if you cannot do deadlift!" - J.P.S.
Moist.
Taking a break from here because life is more important, see you *******s in 6 months. Srs.
-
06-07-2012, 05:46 AM #526
-
06-07-2012, 07:38 AM #527
-
06-07-2012, 07:44 AM #528
-
-
06-07-2012, 07:53 AM #529
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Location: England, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 2,073
- Rep Power: 2169
-
06-07-2012, 10:07 AM #530
-
06-07-2012, 10:49 AM #531
-
06-07-2012, 10:58 AM #532
-
-
06-07-2012, 10:59 AM #533
-
06-07-2012, 11:09 AM #534
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: Arizona, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 7,893
- Rep Power: 54204
Europeans are only good at Soccer and speaking multiple useless languages, we put them back in the dark ages.
It would be like 10 pitbulls vs 3 golden retrievers bro.You are your thoughts. Life is perception, thoughts are perception, perception is reality ergo thoughts are reality, I think therefore I am.
░▒▓█Team Dreamville█▓▒░
08/08/2011. the day the aesthetics died. never forget.
(づ。◕‿‿◕。)づ・。*。✧・゜゜・。 ✧。*・゜
What's a God to a non-believer?
-
06-07-2012, 11:12 AM #535
-
06-07-2012, 11:14 AM #536
China, Japan, Iran and North Korea would win.
Permanent reminder that MBisonSon is a fgt => https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=181456073
Permanent reminder of his cowardly and embarrassing response => https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=181466023 (if this link is dead, the cuckening is complete)
-
-
06-07-2012, 11:16 AM #537
-
06-07-2012, 11:18 AM #538
-
06-07-2012, 11:21 AM #539
-
06-07-2012, 11:27 AM #540
Similar Threads
-
Question, would the world have been a better place if the Axis won WW2??
By dave22 in forum Religion and PoliticsReplies: 448Last Post: 05-06-2013, 12:09 PM
Bookmarks