Why is Homosexuality wrong WITHOUT Quoting the Bible or Using Religion as a Source?

[ACE79]

Because man and woman were created so we could have sex with each other and reproduce, the fundamental purpose of life for all species in natures eyes, reproduce and carry on living, the reason women were given vaginas and men were giving penises, both have to come together to reproduce, they cannot do it alone, our speicies is SUPPOSE to mate with opposite genders, not the same.

inb4 "well in nature, we observe other animals having same sex"... yea... just because other animals do it means it's correct?

This.

/thread

[Annihilate]

So it is equally wrong to be asexual or sterile. If you choose to not have kids, there's something wrong with you.

You don't need to choose to have kids in a certain respect, I mean you do, but a normal functioning human will undoubtedly choose to have kids at some point as it's hard coded, if you like, into our natural instincts, the reason why we are here, the purpose of our life, obviously we can go against that and not have kids, we have a consciousness and ability to make decisions on our own, but the majority of people will have kids.

[ryanthestark]

I'm pretty sure homosexuality (along with war and a few other things) is a natural response when a species overpopulates. When there are more people than our food/shelter/ect can support either we slow our rate of reproducing or kill eachother. Kinda defeats the whole darwin argument.



































(no homo)

[MrGreenz]

if everyone turned homosexual the human race would go extinct.

doesn't sound right to me.

[alaska21]

Perhaps homosexuality serves a purpose, to reduce the rate of growth of our population. Perhaps, as homosexuality becomes more and more common, it will save the human race from the dangers of overpopulation.

Dude...anyone over 18 should now realize most of the stuff that goes on in society has 0 purpose. The population will naturally level off by the way....the weak/poor won't be able to survive and there's a certain point where government/liberals can't "save" everyone

[gatordukie]

cuz dey cant make dem babiiiiessss

[spotila]

I could care less.

[Fozzy13]

Man and women were not "created"

You fail at the start, nice try

prove it

[Annihilate]

Man and women were not "created"

You fail at the start, nice try

whatever, evolved.

wrong choice of words.

Even in evolution, we were still created, something started off evolution, so you could say whatever started the chain reaction which caused evolution, resulted in the eventual creation of man and woman through a series of evolutionary changes. You don't have to look at it from a religious stand point.

[Ravishing_Rick]

i dont care let them reduce the population

[threwupscrewup]

all those saying, it stops evolution, or is Against our natural purpose, consider this, our current population growth is getting out of hand.
[/img]


Perhaps homosexuality serves a purpose, to reduce the rate of growth of our population. Perhaps, as homosexuality becomes more and more common, it will save the human race from the dangers of overpopulation.

one problem with that is it may "serve a purpose" but that is giving intention to evolution, evolution is not intentional. evolution is the name we call our observations about how the world works.

[BBmisc420196]

prove it

Try taking a biology class. We have evolved from common ancestors to the Chimpanzee and other great Apes. Evolution has already been proven. Sorry that you are so ignorant that you require evidence to what should be common knowledge.

Hell forget about fossils, just look at the genes

[DerReise]

You know how when a trend comes along some people, in their lonely and weak-minded states, join this trend in order to shine more light on their dark existence?

That's homosexuality in the 21st century, in a nutshell.

Most of the homosexuals are not actually homosexual, they are just severely twisted in the head and have convinced themselves that the anus of another man is a substitute for the tender, beautiful thighs and pussy of a woman. However, this cannot go unnoticed with them. They must tell you that they are homosexual, otherwise this whole plan falls apart.

Ever notice how every gay guy you meet tells you he's gay? Why must they mention it? As soon as you know they are gay, the find ways to include their gay activities with their significant other into your conversations about banging women. It's all part of them trying to draw attention to how different they are, which they equate with being cool, hip, and trendy.

What's wrong with homosexuality OP? The fact that one man fancies the behind of another. Imagine seeing Scarlett Johansson walking down the street, would you get instantly hard at imaging the thought of raping her?

Now let's go to the opposite extreme. The Rock is walking down the street and a homosexual gets instantly hard at the thought of getting raped by him. See how this is grotesque and vomit-inducing? How can they ignore Scarlett? Those tits, that ass, that face that deserves the heaviest of loads unleashed upon it? Because there is something really wrong with them, that's why. Don't try to politically correct yourself and think otherwise.

The important thing is to leave them alone, let them do them in the comfort of their homes as long as they don't bring it out into the public. That's all.

[vabyss]

Because man and woman were created so we could have sex with each other and reproduce, the fundamental purpose of life for all species in natures eyes, reproduce and carry on living, the reason women were given vaginas and men were giving penises, both have to come together to reproduce, they cannot do it alone, our speicies is SUPPOSE to mate with opposite genders, not the same.

inb4 "well in nature, we observe other animals having same sex"... yea... just because other animals do it means it's correct?

So anyone that does not reproduce is equally wrong...brilliant theory.

How long do you guys have to slam your head against the wall before one of these brilliant nuggets falls out?

[drizzt45]

So it is equally wrong to be asexual or sterile. If you choose to not have kids, there's something wrong with you.

This. Kids aren't for everyone. If I never have kids is there something wrong with me for never reproducing?

[threwupscrewup]

Try taking a biology class. We have evolved from common ancestors to the Chimpanzee and other great Apes. Evolution has already been proven. Sorry that you are so ignorant that you require evidence to what should be common knowledge.

Hell forget about fossils, just look at the genes

]

oh no this isnt gonna turn into creation vs. evolution is it...i think he was trollin

[BBmisc420196]

whatever, evolved.

wrong choice of words.

I was giving you a hard time. When I saw Great Britain in your description I knew you were smarter than that.

[threwupscrewup]

This. Kids aren't for everyone. If I never have kids is there something wrong with me for never reproducing?

its not that its wrong, its that "homosexuals" have no desire to reproduce since they do not have a desire to have sex with women. Thus that's contradictory to our observations of natural selection
edit*

[IEatPowerRacks]

Do you see asexual and sterile people having parades?
Do you see asexual and sterile people on commercials telling you to accept them?

stfu *******

because people don't discriminate against asexual and sterile people. dumb f*ck. People who are already accepted don't need to gain acceptance with commercials. Jesus think before you type up bullsh*t

[Archangel_Lost]

taking it in the ass hurts, yo

[Indestructible6]

If everyone was gay, the human race would end.


Gay = Extinction = End of life = You wouldn't be alive right now if everyone was gay 100 years ago. Arnold wouldn't exist iether. World without the terminator means cyborgs would attack us and nobody would be here to defend us. So...


If you are gay, cyborgs will attack earth and kill everyone! (srs)

[irasceris]

Wrong, how? The definition is arbitrary.

From a biological perspective, it's no more wrong than any other aberration that prevents successful procreative mating (which arguably includes use of birth control).

From a sociological perspective, homosexual individuals are completely capable of contributing to society in every meaningful way that heterosexual individuals are. They have jobs, they are intelligent, they are just as capable of empathy and compassion as anyone else.

The only possible rational argument you could make against homosexuals would be from a socioeconomic standpoint; homosexual couples will typically not have children, and the next generation being more productive than the current one is vital to the continued success of the global economy. But even that is a specious argument, because it carries the implication that homosexuality is a choice, and can be influenced by outside pressure (i.e. encouraging it via acceptance would lead to more homosexuals). Whether or not this is true is debatable, but current science very strongly indicates that homosexuality is biologically driven, as opposed to psychologically.

[CiU]

The amount of ignorance and stupidity in this thread is staggering, even by misc standards.

[IEatPowerRacks]

You don't need to choose to have kids in a certain respect, I mean you do, but a normal functioning human will undoubtedly choose to have kids at some point as it's hard coded, if you like, into our natural instincts, the reason why we are here, the purpose of our life, obviously we can go against that and not have kids, we have a consciousness and ability to make decisions on our own, but the majority of people will have kids.

I think your reasoning on this entire subject is off topic. OP was asking why is homosexuality wrong MORALLY, not genetically. We can sit here all day and ramble about why medicine is wrong, short people are wrong, etc.... this thread isn't about eugenics - it's about the morality of homosexuality.

[threwupscrewup]

The amount of ignorance and stupidity in this thread is staggering, even by misc standards.

coolstorybro.jpg

[Annihilate]

This. Kids aren't for everyone. If I never have kids is there something wrong with me for never reproducing?

Is there something wrong with you? Not necessarily.

but are you fulfilling your purpose here on earth? No.

Think about it for a second, if everyone had the same mindset as you, where do you think the human race would end up?

[Kulenovic]

because people don't discriminate against asexual and sterile people. dumb f*ck. People who are already accepted don't need to gain acceptance with commercials. Jesus think before you type up bullsh*t

how does having parades waving a rainbow flag with daisy dukes on gonna help gay tolerance?

notsureifsrs*******.gif

[Raw D0g]

gay thread is gay

[lucidbrah]

I dont consider anything "wrong" unless it violates 3rd party free will i.e. murder and rape. I couldnt careless what you wanna **** or live with who am i to tell you what to do? This is more of a philosophical question than scientific imo. Lettuce be reality to all you "its wrong cuz it stops evolution and lessens population blah blah blah" whats the differnce between 2 gay guys ****ing and not having kids and normal straight people on birthcontrol? NOTHING so stfu. All this homo hate stems from traditional close minded views preached to kids and passed on to the next generation simply to satisfy the previous.

[IEatPowerRacks]

if everyone turned homosexual the human race would go extinct.

doesn't sound right to me.

That's not true at all... first off, you're going off to an extreme. There is no reason the human race would suddenly turn homosexual. Secondly, even if that were the case, there can still be sperm donations... vaginal sex isn't the only way to reproduce.