|
-
10-25-2008, 09:34 PM #181
-
10-25-2008, 09:42 PM #182
-
10-25-2008, 09:47 PM #183
-
10-25-2008, 10:02 PM #184
http://www.mypyramid.gov/pyramid/index.html
Here is the new food pyramid.
Flame away, but I actually like how the carb macro is heavily weighted towards vegetables and fruits.
Of course a person can increase protein individually, but I wonder how many of these positive 40% protein testimonies are due to using mainly carbs like brown rice, steel cut oats and wheat bread. In these cases I bet the higher protein is working better mainly because lean meat, chicken, fish is just more nutritious (not because of the extra aminos)
-
-
10-25-2008, 10:04 PM #185
-
10-26-2008, 03:05 AM #186
For those of you that claim that Tommy have some sort of "magical" genetics - here you go:
Food quality does not change the laws of thermodynamics. Provided you consume adequate protein, EFAs, fiber, and vitamins and minerals you can eat whatever you want.
The only difference between a 'clean' and a 'dirty' food is how much of it you eat.
The Glycemic Index is meaningless unless you eat carbs alone in a fasted state. As soon as you add fat, protein, or fiber to a meal or have eaten in the previous 4-6 hours the GI is irrelevant.
-
10-26-2008, 04:18 AM #187
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
- Age: 62
- Posts: 10,550
- Rep Power: 5240
Yorkshireman I: Right! I had to get up in the morning, at ten o'clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, eat a lump of cold poison, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill and pay mill-owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our dad would kill us and dance about on our graves, singing Hallelujah!
-
10-26-2008, 04:47 AM #188
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
- Age: 62
- Posts: 10,550
- Rep Power: 5240
Sporto
I guess I am confused. I thought bro science was eating 6 meals a day equally divided calorie-wise, and eating only "approved" foods in certain combinations, and at certain times of the day, similar to the scivation approach I tried a couple of years back. It worked!
I thought the science type people disagree with this. As long as you eat the right number of calories, adequate protein, fiber, etc, it really doesn't matter what the rest of the food is.
Maybe I have it all backwards.
all I know is when I get real anal about eating, have it all mapped out on a daily basis with little to no freedom of choice, my willpower becomes much better.
Whatever that is called, it works for me.
Maybe my genetics are ok, after all. I have 170 lbs of lbm, which is more than a lot of people weigh who are my height.Last edited by namtrag; 10-26-2008 at 04:50 AM.
Yorkshireman I: Right! I had to get up in the morning, at ten o'clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, eat a lump of cold poison, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill and pay mill-owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our dad would kill us and dance about on our graves, singing Hallelujah!
-
-
10-26-2008, 07:23 AM #189
just because someone is on the skinny side doesnt mean they dont have the potential.
telling everyone no matter what their genetic heritage, that they can achieve laynes or tommy's hell even my physique is just kinda wrong, because for everyone that can, there are many many more that cant...no matter what they do, what supplements they take, how hard they train or how dedicated they are to their diet
-
10-26-2008, 07:28 AM #190Food quality does not change the laws of thermodynamics. Provided you consume adequate protein, EFAs, fiber, and vitamins and minerals you can eat whatever you want.
The only difference between a 'clean' and a 'dirty' food is how much of it you eat.
The Glycemic Index is meaningless unless you eat carbs alone in a fasted state. As soon as you add fat, protein, or fiber to a meal or have eaten in the previous 4-6 hours the GI is irrelevant.
-
10-26-2008, 07:45 AM #191
-
10-26-2008, 09:01 AM #192
you can disagree all you want. how many lifters have you worked with? how many people have you trained directly that have busted their ass in the gym, nailed their diet, done all their cardio, took their supps, got the right amount of sleep? now how many of them have achieved the level of either of those two?
the average person can not and will not ever look like either of those guys, no matter what they do. You have bought into the marketing hype just like nearly everyone else.
-
-
10-26-2008, 09:03 AM #193
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 5,013
- Rep Power: 5634
Where in the bloody hell did you find that?!? And yes, for anyone following...this is me!
Real science people aren't advocating eating the same thing every day. That has nothing to do with science. Now, hitting numbers to either come underneath, match, or a slight surplus beyond average caloric expenditure to produce desired results is. Completely different.
Yes you are confused. Broscience is not saying "eating 6-7 meals a day spread out"...broscience is saying "eating 6-7 times a day speeds up your metabolism", which it doesn't There is a big difference there. There is no metabolic advantage to it. What it might do is help with satiety, or it might help the peaks and valleys of insulin for IR people...but when someone says they do that because it speeds up their metabolism - that is following broscience. If youa re doing it because you need that many meals to eat all of your calories, like doing it that way, or find that it helps you mentally to do it that way, then that is perfectly fine. See the difference? Broscience guys specifically do things and say that the reason why they are doing it is because of 'mythical science" and all the 'real science' guys are doing is saying that a) these things aren't necessary to get results and b) the science they believe for their reason is a myth.
I hope that clears this all up!
SportoCore Nutritionals Sponsored Athlete
IFPA Professional Natural Bodybuilder
NASM Certified Personal Trainer
-
10-26-2008, 09:08 AM #194
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 5,013
- Rep Power: 5634
But...you would have to be working with someone for over a decade to be able to use this in the discussion. This type of physique is not developed in a year or even two...it takes many years to turn crap genetics into something, which Layne and I have done for over a decade. Personally, I have seen people with horrible genetcis older than me, that have been training longer than me, who have a better physique than me...and they have come from worse than I did.
And take a look at Marc Lobliner...Marc was an ENORMOUS fatty and he has an amazing physique now because of all the hard work over the years. You should read his story and see all the road blocks he had to bust through to get to where he was at. It certainly was NOT genetics...
SportoCore Nutritionals Sponsored Athlete
IFPA Professional Natural Bodybuilder
NASM Certified Personal Trainer
-
10-26-2008, 09:12 AM #195
Im not saying that genetics are the be all end all, they are not. BUT they are a huge factor. Its kinda like telling everyone, train real hard for a long time, do all the right things and you'll be a 400lb bencher. it just doesnt work that way. Most guys will never get their, they dont have the fiber types/cns recruitment to do it. It would be like me telling everyone I can bench 500, if you train long enough you can too. just wont happen unless you are majorly pre disposed to it like I am
really it doesnt matter, everyone needs to bust their as, do all the right things CONSISTENTLY for a long period of time and let the cards fall as they may
-
10-26-2008, 09:13 AM #196
-
-
10-26-2008, 09:20 AM #197
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 5,013
- Rep Power: 5634
And on the flip side, just because someone is on the fat side doesn't mean it either. And you are saying that you can OBVIOUSLY tell that I have potential by seeing my tiny ass frame and poor genetics right here, huh? Okey dokey.
Not only is it NOT wrong, but you SHOULD be telling people that they can achieve things. Are you telling me that you actually want to set up people mentally to either fail or not even try? People who have average or below genetics that want a physique like mine NEED to believe that they can get there. Hell, I'm going to save this picture and post it in my thread for the many who follow me to show where I came from.
The only people who 'can't' are the ones who refuse to do what it takes for as long as it takes. Period. If someone has the drive and determination to get what they want, bad genetics will NOT stop them. Look at Kurt Weidner...one of the top WNBF pros. Here is a guy who has some of the worst genetics in all of bodybuilding, yet he has willed himself to be at the top because of his dedication. He is incredibly strong, has done what it takes over the years, gets incredibly lean, and even though his structure is not built for bodybuilding, he always places at the top. Telling people they can't get to where I am is something I can't do like you just stated at the end of your post. Call me an optimist, but I believe people have the power to get what they want...and if it is a physique like mine and they have the drive that I have and put in the YEARS of consistent work that I did - sure, it might take them longer, or heck even less - but they WILL get there.
SportoCore Nutritionals Sponsored Athlete
IFPA Professional Natural Bodybuilder
NASM Certified Personal Trainer
-
10-26-2008, 09:25 AM #198
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 5,013
- Rep Power: 5634
This is a poor example. Benching 500lbs and acquiring a balanced, muscular and aesthetic physique are NOT in the same ballpark. Try again.
Genetics are HUGE for some things, yes. In acquiring an aesthetic, muscular physique - which is open for interpretation depending on who you are talking to, it doesn't play the role that drive and deterination do...not by a long shot.
Sporto
SportoCore Nutritionals Sponsored Athlete
IFPA Professional Natural Bodybuilder
NASM Certified Personal Trainer
-
10-26-2008, 09:28 AM #199
-
10-26-2008, 09:35 AM #200
Tommy, if we are going to quote each other, lets not put words in each others mouths. The first quote of mine you used and then replied to. I was not saying that at all. I was a heavier kid growing up, had to wear the husky pants and all...yeah, kinda fat. I never said i could obviously tell, did I? I said just because someone is skinny growing up does not mean they dont have potential
Im all about seeing people succeed. Im a trainer myself, both in my own studio and online through redpointfitness.com It is our mission to get people where they want to be. While encouragement is paramount and I fully believe in it, i also do not believe in lying to people and telling everyone that if they work hard, long enough that they can look like a top level BB'er regardless of federation or drug usage.
-
-
10-26-2008, 09:37 AM #201
[QUOTE=XX1;237040491]using another incredibly gifted PRO as an example is just mindblowing.
if its that easy, why are there not thousands of phil heaths walking around
its because it doenst work that way[/QUOTe
It was just an example showing that you do not need to feel inferior to somone because they are a pro, just be intense and grow.
-
10-26-2008, 09:55 AM #202
- Join Date: Oct 2003
- Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 5,013
- Rep Power: 5634
You quoting my picture, where genetics is obviously not on my side (after saying I was blessed with great genetics), and then saying what you did about well...just because they are small doesn't mean the potential isn't there, instead of simply admitting that you were wrong about my gifted genetics was an incinuation all in itself. Sorry for putting words in your mouth, but I'm not an idiot.
And if you think that what I am referring to about this entire discussion is lying to people, then I feel bad for you because, not only are you putting words into my mouth (practice what you preach buddy), but you are missing the point completely. I'm talking about telling people to not let genetics stand in the way of getting the physique they want. That has nothing to do with telling everyone they can be a top level bodybuilder no matter what drugs they use or what federation they are in.
Let's just agree to disagree. I don't think genetics plays the HUGE role you think it does, because if it did, I would not look the way I do. No need to carry on anymore discussion.
SportoCore Nutritionals Sponsored Athlete
IFPA Professional Natural Bodybuilder
NASM Certified Personal Trainer
-
10-26-2008, 10:40 AM #203
-
10-26-2008, 10:47 AM #204
you were skinny as a kid, so what? assuming you have poor genetics simply based on that criteria is a poor way of looking at things
lets consider some factors of growth potential
Here are just SOME of the factors that ultimately determine how big and strong you get, and what paths are appropriate to get you there:
Cortisol output
Adrenaline output
Insulin output
insulin sensitivity
Thyroid output
Thyroid sensitivity
Testosterone production
Testosterone/hormone sensitivity
Testosterone to estrogen conversion
SHGB sensitivity
Testosterone to DHT conversion
Estrogen sensitivity
Growth Hormone output
Growth Hormone sensitivity
IGF output
IGF sensitivity
Digestive capability
Basic protein synthesis ability
Muscle fiber composition
Muscle fiber content
Motor unit recruitment/motor unit density
CNS output/CNS recovery
Hard wired stress response
Emotional states
guess we can tell where you fall in each of those from your pic as a kid right?
ALL THESE FACTORS ARE ALL DETERMINED BY AN INDIVIDUALS GENETICS. AND THEY DON?T VARY A LITTLE, THEY VARY A LOT.
To say genetics only accounts for a small degree of the achieved results is just wrong
This doesnt mean you cant make awesome progress or build an impressive physique, but it does mean that most just simply don?t have the potential to be top bodybuilders or look like you or layne or me. And EVERYONE responds differently. I drastically prefer optimism over pssimism and anyone that knows me will tell you that but I also prefer to be realistic with people, and potential can only be known in retrospect AFTER you have tried. But all these posts by guys saying genetics are not important and guys just use them as an excuse is purely wrong
-
-
10-26-2008, 11:00 AM #205
-
10-26-2008, 11:02 AM #206
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,590
- Rep Power: 26406
Jeffers' physique is a combination of genetics and training.
For the purposes of my point, I'll assume he has "good" genetics. That said, years of training, diet, supplementation, etc. have also played a role.Nutrition and Supp Science FAQ:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=139153843&p=849049173&viewfull=1#post849049173
-
10-26-2008, 11:06 AM #207
- Join Date: May 2008
- Location: Union, Maine, United States
- Age: 57
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 10500
I'm going to have to politely disagree. A number of the aforementioned genetic capabilities can be improved upon. Granted, there is a reason some people are jockeys and others are Mike linebackers, but there is just absolutely no substitute for hard work, harder focus & keeping one's eyes on the prize.
The coaching phrase "Looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane" comes to mind.
There are a LOT of people getting paid rediculous sums of money to play kid's games professionally and, genetically, have absolutely no busy being in that position. Think Big Papi enjoyed having mighty Dustin Pedroia batting cleanup BEHIND him this season? Damn right he did....
We as a society can statistically/chemically measure & quantify about every genetic criteria you post. But I have yet to see a test that can measure drive, passion and dedication. That alone should speak volumes as to what is more important - no one except you knows how much you have.
/pulpitLast edited by BuckSpin; 10-26-2008 at 11:10 AM.
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure"
-
10-26-2008, 11:08 AM #208
-
-
10-26-2008, 11:09 AM #209
lovely! genetics are huge in any athletic endeavour.
I completely agree. I was never trying to incinuate that tommy or layne or any of the others mentioned havent paid more than thier share of dues.
Im the same way, you can see in any of my youtube vids I bust my ass in the gym, i eat what im supposed to, do all the right things over a long period of time
-
10-26-2008, 11:12 AM #210
no, not at all. drive determination and all that are important, no one is arguing that they are not.
unless you are pre disposed, you will never be as remotely fast as an olympic sprinter. spend the rest of your life training for it and you wont even come close, unless of course you can already run a sub 10.5 in the hundred meters with no training. that is the power of genetics
Bookmarks