Why do people still think Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty?

[AndrewTateTopG]

Only in 'Merica can you kill an unarmed man who never laid a hand on you.

He jumped him

[blissful88]

Only in 'Merica can you kill an unarmed man who never laid a hand on you.

Ever seen the damage a swinging skateboard causes to the skull? It can easily kill you

One of them had a pistol drawn on him


Only in America do Liberals defend literal lifelong criminals & p33do's

The first guy was chasing him, throwing things at him, while screaming “I’m going to kill you”

The second guy pointed a gun at him

The third guy was hitting him with a skateboard

Wizard

[hardcock]

The first guy was chasing him, throwing things at him, while screaming “I’m going to kill you”

The second guy pointed a gun at him

The third guy was hitting him with a skateboard

by throwing things you're referring to a plastic shopping bag? I don't know about you, but I've never seen anyone die from a plastic bag being thrown in their direction. Not to mention Kylie was unaware of this as he had his cowardly back turned toward the man. But, I find it interesting you fail to mention what occurred just prior to that which was Kylie hunting the man down and the man hiding behind parked cars. Funny, you leave that part out. So, that's how you justify that first killing? A plastic shopping bag......ok

[hardcock]

Ever seen the damage a swinging skateboard causes to the skull? It can easily kill you

One of them had a pistol drawn on him


Only in America do Liberals defend literal lifelong criminals & p33do's




Wizard

You have to start with the first killing. The man Kylie was hunting. The man hiding behind cars. He never touched Kylie. He had no gun nor skateboard.

[Duckliver]

Why is it that anarcho liberals feel the need to destroy the businesses of their American peers (and get called heros) while conservatives literally rush the capital (signaling abolishment of government) and get called terrorists?
."

OVERSOCIALIZATION

24. Psychologists use the term "socialization" to designate the process by which children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. It may seem senseless to say that many leftists are over-socialized, since the leftist is perceived as a rebel. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. Many leftists are not such rebels as they seem.

25. The moral code of our society is so demanding that no one can think, feel and act in a completely moral way. For example, we are not supposed to hate anyone, yet almost everyone hates somebody at some time or other, whether he admits it to himself or not. Some people are so highly socialized that the attempt to think, feel and act morally imposes a severe burden on them. In order to avoid feelings of guilt, they continually have to deceive themselves about their own motives and find moral explanations for feelings and actions that in reality have a nonmoral origin. We use the term "oversocialized" to describe such people. [2]

26. Oversocialization can lead to low self-esteem, a sense of powerlessness, defeatism, guilt, etc. One of the most important means by which our society socializes children is by making them feel ashamed of behavior or speech that is contrary to society's expectations. If this is overdone, or if a particular child is especially susceptible to such feelings, he ends by feeling ashamed of HIMSELF. Moreover the thought and the behavior of the oversocialized person are more restricted by society's expectations than are those of the lightly socialized person. The majority of people engage in a significant amount of naughty behavior. They lie, they commit petty thefts, they break traffic laws, they goof off at work, they hate someone, they say spiteful things or they use some underhanded trick to get ahead of the other guy. The oversocialized person cannot do these things, or if he does do them he generates in himself a sense of shame and self-hatred. The oversocialized person cannot even experience, without guilt, thoughts or feelings that are contrary to the accepted morality; he cannot think "unclean" thoughts. And socialization is not just a matter of morality; we are socialized to conform to many norms of behavior that do not fall under the heading of morality. Thus the oversocialized person is kept on a psychological leash and spends his life running on rails that society has laid down for him. In many oversocialized people this results in a sense of constraint and powerlessness that can be a severe hardship. We suggest that oversocialization is among the more serious cruelties that human being inflict on one another.

27. We argue that a very important and influential segment of the modern left is oversocialized and that their oversocialization is of great importance in determining the direction of modern leftism. Leftists of the oversocialized type tend to be intellectuals or members of the upper-middle class. Notice that university intellectuals [3] constitute the most highly socialized segment of our society and also the most leftwing segment.

28. The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today's leftists are NOT in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes [4] for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles.

Dr. Kazynski wrote that in the nineties, he didn’t even get to see how the stupid masses responded to oversocialization via social media.

[ansatsuken]

Nope lol

[BigGameJames]

nobody is talking about old news.

op just stop

[Ratfish]

[BigBallsMcgee]

Didn’t you watch the trial or just go by astronaut twitter ? It was legal for him to carry a gun his age with no permit, it was legal for him to carry and cross state lines, it was legal for him tos hoot when he got jumped by astronauts and defend himself

Please show me in the trial where he committed a crime?

you're a racist

[Ratfish]

[Joggernot]

It's a simple answer- people who think he's guilty are just unfamiliar with the case and trial, or they're knowledge of it is from a heavily biased source.


Edit-

based

[78novacaine]

Only in 'Merica can you kill an unarmed man who never laid a hand on you.

Where/when did this happen?

[vatn1k]

Literally none of them watched the trial.

When you consider how mad ppl got over some dead felon and a p3do, kind of makes you wonder about the power of media and fake news.

[hardcock]

Where/when did this happen?

The first guy he murdered. Never laid a hand on him. Had no weapon.

[yabbayabba]

Saint Kyle doing God's work.

[SmillironS]

The first guy he murdered. Never laid a hand on him. Had no weapon.

He was a felon and a democrat, Kyle did the country a favor by disposing of that piece of crap.

[navid93]

The first guy he murdered. Never laid a hand on him. Had no weapon.

You’re allowed to use lethal force when you are in a position to reasonably fear you are in danger of great bodily harm.

He was chasing him while screaming I am going to kill you…on top of that Kyle had a visible gun. I think it’s fair to say that who ever is willing to chase down a man with a visible gun has lethal motives.

It was 100% reasonable for Kyle to fear great bodily harm

[frankdtank20]

You have to start with the first killing. The man Kylie was hunting. The man hiding behind cars. He never touched Kylie. He had no gun nor skateboard.

Dude was threatening earlier, then hid behind a car hoping to jump Rittenhouse or one of the others there like him. He ran at Rittenhouse, verbally threatening him while trying to take the gun away from Rittenhouse. Nothing of value was lost that night.