Supreme Court Justice Kennedy announces retirement

[zilaniz]

If they wait until midterms and Dems win they'll stonewall this pick through the entirety of his presidency.

good

[rocketfish]

Trump supported gay marriage before he even announced he was running. I doubt he is going to be looking for someone to overturn it.

you are right

trump is the first president to ever support gays going into office

obama was against gays, changed his stance during his term

[Audioslave]

Trump supported gay marriage before he even announced he was running. I doubt he is going to be looking for someone to overturn it.

I am actually in agreement with you that Trump is really pro gay marriage. However, this is politics, and I wouldn't put it past him to nominate someone who is anti-gay marriage in order to appease the religious right.

And to be honest, I am not 100% sold that Trump is even truly pro life. He used to be pro choice and I don't know if he would truly want Roe v Wade repealed, however it would certainly help him with voters.

[Doxx6755]

lmao PLEASE!

Do any exist?

[Procta]

life comes at your fast

[Cleveland33]

ok, she doesn't fit the mold for age, but what if he nominates his sister?

[Cleveland33]

Ben Shapiro just tweeted Trump that he is only 34 and could be on the court for 60 years.

I'd laugh if Trump retweets it or says something like he's on the list

[swoleyo]

For a good laugh, check out twitter ablaze:

https://twitter.com/search?q=%22Just...dy%22&src=tren

Lol Twitter is so unhinged. Their blaming him for retiring saying his entire legacy means nothing to them now

[JaegerBrah]

So much salt and so much winning, all in one week.

[ssg10587]

From back with Gorsuch: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings...me-court-list/

It's funny this nuclear option is coming back to bite Dems in the ass. Think many want McConnell to wait until midterm election so whoever wins the senate gets to decide. Skeptical he'll let that happen.

[joecayse]

So much salt and so much winning, all in one week.

Who are these strawmen conservatives wringing their hands in excitement of stripping women and gay people of rights?

[ohiostate124]

Who are these strawmen conservatives wringing their hands in excitement of stripping women and gay people of rights?

They literally have to make up things to be upset about.

[Austanian]

Who are these strawmen conservatives wringing their hands in excitement of stripping women and gay people of rights?

Roe V Wade I wouldn't be surprised. That is still HEAVILY charged.

I don't see gay marriage being overturned even though it should have been never been passed this way.

[Rockchalk0420]

For a good laugh, check out twitter ablaze:

https://twitter.com/search?q=%22Just...dy%22&src=tren

The cognitive dissonance is amazing with these people. Somehow they think that the majority party should play a weakened hand by waiting until after the mid-terms to elect a justice. They point to the decision in 2016 to withhold Merrick Garlands vote...Someone needs to remind the democrats that elections have consequences. "Wait to place a vote until after the elections." We had those elections in 2016! These pathetic losers seem to forget that THIS was exactly what the 2016 elections were about. All these stupid "Never Trump" republicans that opted to vote for Hillary over the Republican nominee Trump would have subjected the country to a left leaning supreme court had they had it their way!

As a conservative, I couldn't be happier with another conservative being nominated to the highest court in the land. Next up, Ruth Bader Ginsburg...who is 85 years old. She will be the next to go. Trump is electing young judges like Gorsuch, who is 50 years old. He is doing this to insure the survival of conservative values for DECADES to come. Justice Kennedy was a swing vote for a lot of liberal causes. He was a conservative, but I hope to see an even more conservative as his replacement. The 2016 election was the BIGGEST election in our life times (and possibly ever up to this point). This explains the "deep state", MSM, and democrat party going absolutely ape**** about the Trump Admin.

MAGA Boys! Keep the winning going!

[bubbathudd]

Roe V Wade I wouldn't be surprised. That is still HEAVILY charged.

I don't see gay marriage being overturned even though it should have been never been passed this way.

R v W will never change and shouldn't. It just isn't going to happen. MJ is here to stay and will likely become legal at the federal level. I don't care about da gays. I am conservative and not interested in the high court changing any of that stuff.

[litljay]

Roe V Wade I wouldn't be surprised. That is still HEAVILY charged.

I don't see gay marriage being overturned even though it should have been never been passed this way.

The SCOTUS is not going to go back and re-visit Roe v Wade or any previous ruling.

[BullStampede]

Still not tired. Cant wait for RBG to have a stroke and for Breyer to follow soon after.

All I care about is immigration controls. The rest will fall into place after that.

[7rmr]

The SCOTUS is not going to go back and re-visit Roe v Wade or any previous ruling.

Maybe not. But it could certainly uphold extremely restrictive abortion laws even if they don't technically make abortion illegal. The end result could still make access to abortion impossible in some states, even if it's not illegal.

[Tears]

For a good laugh, check out twitter ablaze:

https://twitter.com/search?q=%22Just...dy%22&src=tren

****ing lol

triggered.mp3

[ohiostate124]

[Austanian]

Maybe not. But it could certainly uphold extremely restrictive abortion laws even if they don't technically make abortion illegal. The end result could still make access to abortion impossible in some states, even if it's not illegal.

This...

Texas's Abortion laws for example could have been upheld.

[icetrauma]

The triggering is absolutely crazy.

[eltoro24]

Maybe not. But it could certainly uphold extremely restrictive abortion laws even if they don't technically make abortion illegal. The end result could still make access to abortion impossible in some states, even if it's not illegal.

Would be crazy if they looked at it, it was 7-2. Highly doubt it.

Crazy thought that Norma McCorvey went super anti abortion in her older years and wanted it overturned as well. Women!

[Rockchalk0420]

So much salt and so much winning, all in one week.

You know you've lost when you have to resort to "playing dirty." What a bunch of sad pathetic losers. BTW, we already had these elections in 2016! We all knew that the next president was going to be deciding two new justices at the very least back in early 2016. All these "outraged" and "shocked" democrats knew what the stakes were. And they still lost 30 states to the Trump machine.

Marijuana is safe. This administration has already said they would support legalizing it. Roe vs. wade should be overturned, along with things like affirmative action. "Sensible gun control" is dead THANK GOD! As all it is is Trojan horse by liberal democrats to regulate the Second Amendment out of existence. The rest of that list is just far left talking points that arent really worth the time to discuss. To liberals, you lost. You lost your chance in 2016 to reshape this country. You were soooo close. Unfortunately, the rest of the country didn't agree with your vision for America, and soundly rejected your views in 2010, 2014, and 2016.

[7rmr]

Seems a little much.

[Forty0zFreedom]

Maybe not. But it could certainly uphold extremely restrictive abortion laws even if they don't technically make abortion illegal. The end result could still make access to abortion impossible in some states, even if it's not illegal.

Guess you guys are gonna have to debate abortion instead of declaring the argument won and condemning all dissent.

Personally I think abortion should be outlawed after the first trimester at the very least. I'm happy if this is a start towards that.

[N0rds]

Seems a little much.

Not when you realize the left has nothing but emotions and outrage...

[DuracellBunny]

Dems should be scared, but not for any of the reasons already stated.

The Dems have their pet judges on the 9th circuit court that they use for everything, and as of the recent travel ban ruling, the SC is already concerned about them overstepping their authority. Introduce another strict constitutionalist to the SC, and watch how quickly the 9th circuit court gets it's wings clipped.

[Forty0zFreedom]

Dems should be scared, but not for any of the reasons already stated.

The Dems have their pet judges on the 9th circuit court that they use for everything, and as of the recent travel ban ruling, the SC is already concerned about them overstepping their authority. Introduce another strict constitutionalist to the SC, and watch how quickly the 9th circuit court gets it's wings clipped.

The John Roberts smackdown of the 9th circuit almost makes up for Obamacare.

[Jrd86]

The John Roberts smackdown of the 9th circuit almost makes up for Obamacare.

Would like to see what your talking about! Good day to be conservative boys! MAGA