|
-
07-07-2017, 07:34 AM #61
-
07-07-2017, 08:06 AM #62
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 56,938
- Rep Power: 598959
"Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6. Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossible to touch a minor inappropriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognize someone putting a hand on their chest as groping, whether it is inappropriate or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
-
07-07-2017, 08:08 AM #63
-
07-07-2017, 08:14 AM #64
Nothing to do with your made up hierarchy. Oppressive actions are challenged no matter who they are perpetrated by. There are plenty of Muslims here yet gays aren't being subjected to the same discrimination as they were under old conservative regimes. You're just making stuff up. There has been no compromise. It turns out you don't have to discriminate against all Muslims in order to also have gay rights. Shocker!
See:
Physics crew
-
-
07-07-2017, 08:21 AM #65
Wouldn't trans soldiers require hormone? I don't see how they should be allowed if they're constantly in requirement of medication. It makes them less useful in combat situations and simply complicates situations.
The shower thing is off too. Not sure why women, or anyone, should adjust to others. Offer separate wash areas.
-
07-07-2017, 08:25 AM #66
-
07-07-2017, 08:32 AM #67
-
07-07-2017, 08:32 AM #68
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 56,938
- Rep Power: 598959
"Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6. Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossible to touch a minor inappropriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognize someone putting a hand on their chest as groping, whether it is inappropriate or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
-
-
07-07-2017, 08:34 AM #69
-
07-07-2017, 08:36 AM #70
trannies should not be able to serve in the military. weed them out at the recruiting depot and meps; if they decide to "transition" while on active duty, chapter them out with an honorable discharge.
also, women should not be in combat arms. period.
this chit needs to be overturned.**average penis crew**
[ ] cutting
[ ] bulking
[x] jerking
-
07-07-2017, 08:38 AM #71
-
07-07-2017, 08:50 AM #72
-
-
07-07-2017, 08:53 AM #73
This is absolutely retarded. I'm glad I got out when I did. Let's not act like we all didn't see it coming though. Homosexual acceptance within the military was already hated by most, but put up with because, well, we put up with whatever we're told to put up with. Liberals like to victimize and create little sub-classes of everything, that's the basic principals that allow Marxists to gain power over the majority. To say that this (and worse) wasn't seen before now, would be an understatement. Just wait for their inevitable "****philia acceptance" campaigns that are bound to arise sooner or later. They've been prepping that chit for years now.
-
07-07-2017, 08:54 AM #74
-
07-07-2017, 08:56 AM #75
-
07-07-2017, 09:00 AM #76
There is no universally protected class. The backward ideas that women may have are to be criticized as well. If it offends them, so be it. Not everyone is going to like change. That's a fact of life, but catering to everyone's feelings has never been part of progressive ideology. The status quo would otherwise never change. At some point, you have to push institutional change.
Physics crew
-
-
07-07-2017, 09:18 AM #77
What a military institution should be able to do to its members is not even remotely comparable to what a high school institution should be able to do to its students. I'm not going to pretend like they're one in the same to entertain your bogus point, just because you managed to sign up at 17 with parental consent. There is a world of difference between what's expected of our members of our armed forces and what's expected of a 14 year old kid in gym class. I'm willing to entertain most hypotheticals, but not dishonest ones.
Physics crew
-
07-07-2017, 09:20 AM #78
-
07-07-2017, 09:31 AM #79
-
07-07-2017, 09:36 AM #80
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 20,874
- Rep Power: 238845
you just refuse to believe the reality of the world we live in.
1. to even agree with this at all is unpatriotic. This only lessens the lethality of the militarys #1 goal- defend the nation and impose our will on others during a time of war. Our goal in the military SHOULD be the combat effectiveness, which is the ground zero of the military function. Throwing wrenches into the gears is the agenda of the liberal lunacy that can't think long term.
2. To spend that much money to cater to .3% of the population (And then what is the # for the military?) is complete insanity. To try and cater to every person who decides they are an attack helicopter, a fish, or a garbage can is impossible without the outcome being the destruction of the civilization.
Idgaf what people do in their own homes/time. The second that my rights infringe or becoming infringed upon to appease a political agenda is when I have a problem.
You seem to just be devils advocate for anything on here. Or are you really this insane?USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
-
-
07-07-2017, 09:51 AM #81
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 19,742
- Rep Power: 88148
I don't understand this world anymore.
Finance Degree - USAF INTEL - IIFYM - Injured Crew - KTM XCW300 - Single Track Trail Rider - NRA Supporter - Shunned from MFC - Libertarian - Pragmatist
B: 345, S 375, D 445
Trying to get your ideal outcome often leads to the passing up of practical alternatives that deny your adversaries theirs.
-
07-07-2017, 09:58 AM #82
-
07-07-2017, 09:59 AM #83
1) I agree that combat effectiveness should is an important goal of the military, but I don't agree that soldiers should be subject to discrimination as part of that goal. Before the military was integrated, people were arguing that blacks in the units would destroy their effectiveness. That was complete bunk but they felt just as passionately as you do. I also don't agree that women seeing a penis in the showers is going to jeopardize our military in any substantial way. It's fear-mongering being used as a basis to discriminate against other service members.
2) That's not how I imagined the apocalypse would go down.
3) What rights of yours are being infringed upon? The right for a service member to never have to see the opposite genitalia in the showers isn't a real one.Physics crew
-
07-07-2017, 10:04 AM #84
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Sacramento, California, United States
- Posts: 37,277
- Rep Power: 272515
How erect must those 4-incher nu-males be when they see chit like this?
Though I guess it will probably be easier for heteros to get their rendezvous, if the guy can put up with acting transgendered for however long it takes to shower.
Then maybe a trans can sue for being subjected to heterosexual sex? Kinda fun to come up with these scenarios.ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
-
-
07-07-2017, 10:13 AM #85
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 20,874
- Rep Power: 238845
Jesus dude, you can't even distinguish the difference between black people and those that have a mental illness? And whether or not you agree it's a mental illness doesn't matter. Nobody was scared of black people- they were racist. Nobody is scared of transgenders- they just dont add to the effectiveness of the military. Spending money on those physically and mentally able to help the military is one thing, spending tax payer dollars so these people that have a gender issue in their head can PARTICIPATE in the military is insanity. Do you know how many people will not join the military that are uncomfortable with this? A lot.
2. Really? Because it's going to either be from the inside with ridiculous catering like this or WMDs. Only WMDs will destroy the world for a while, in this instance it will just be our country.
3. I have n o idea why youre so simple minded when it comes to this. I am fully within my right to object that my taxes are going to have someones dick cut off or hours and hours of sensitivity training because .01% (or even less?)USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
-
07-07-2017, 10:15 AM #86
-
07-07-2017, 10:16 AM #87
-
07-07-2017, 10:18 AM #88
-
-
07-07-2017, 10:19 AM #89
- Join Date: Apr 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,435
- Rep Power: 119540
I hope the special operations community holds strong against this as long as possible. We're still capable of winning wars, it's only a matter of time before social justice takes precedence over fighting ability for the military. This **** needs to end. The goal of the military is to win wars, not act as a goddamn social experiment.
-
07-07-2017, 10:23 AM #90
Bookmarks