lol pc and mac threads are basically Religion / Politics section of the misc
|
-
01-24-2016, 10:27 AM #61
-
01-24-2016, 10:44 AM #62
-
01-24-2016, 10:45 AM #63
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,907
- Rep Power: 85705
In fact, they're taking shots at the Macbots that fall for all the hype. If nothing else, it should make you think. But what if you need a portable workstation? Wait! Macs are so small now that they can in fact, be mobile. Looks like Apple thought of everything. They are too clever. No? No. In fact, pc/mac are quantifiable. Put them side-by-side and run your applications.
Last edited by KRANE; 01-24-2016 at 10:53 AM.
🎥
Site oldest post: [url]https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941[/url]
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
-
01-24-2016, 10:45 AM #64
-
-
01-24-2016, 10:50 AM #65
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 10,421
- Rep Power: 27436
They are also taking shots at console gamers all the time, however in that case it's apparently worth spending few times the value of a console. There are as many PCbots as there are Macbots. Imo, either group is not really worth debating about since their use case is very limited and the driving force for their hype is different than actual advantages/disadvantages of a platform.
I wouldn't call something uncommon that literally has shtload of hits on Google with same issues.
-
01-24-2016, 10:56 AM #66
http://www.tonymacx86.com/
http://www.insanelymac.com/
2 of the biggest hackintosh communities which provide info on how to install OS X on many hardware configurations. CPU's include Core 2, i3-7, Pentium, Xeon, and in some cases AMD. Thunderbolt support, USB 3.1, 980 Ti, 802.11ac + Bluetooth, some of the recent Radeon GPU's, NVMe M.2 SSD's like Samsung 950 Pro, 4k screens, and more.Last edited by ispy; 01-24-2016 at 11:01 AM.
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
-
01-24-2016, 11:19 AM #67
-
01-24-2016, 11:29 AM #68
You can't just do it on any desktop.
What that guy who's lower lip looks like he's permanently chewing Skoal forgot to mention is it only works on a short list of specific brands and components and almost always has some caveat like not being able to do major updates easily, stability issues and crashes, lots of trial and error and problems, WiFi or sound not working. A simple future update can easily brick a hackintosh.
Its not a clean install by any means. Makes no sense to do a hackintosh and the whole point of Apple is their superior hardware quality, stability, and battery life.Last edited by KingSWRV; 01-24-2016 at 11:35 AM.
-
-
01-24-2016, 11:39 AM #69
Obviously you don't just buy a system first, and try to install OS X on it. If you take a few minutes to browse through those sites, then you'll see that they contain info to most compatible and stable builds possible, and fixes for most issues that a user might experience. Even some systems by Dell and HP (and possibly others) can be hackintoshed. All it requires is some reading.
Most of the time it's easy to update, and doesn't require more than to reactivate audio drivers and install updated nvidia drivers.▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
-
01-24-2016, 11:45 AM #70
Again, even installing certain apps can bring the whole house of cards down. Future updates can kill functionality if not brick the computer. You have to walk on eggshells with it. I would only recommend tinkering with such a thing if its a secondary computer and you have another one to fall back on.
1. It takes a LOT of time, effort and expertise. And headaches.
2. 100% stability is unachievable
3. A Hackintosh can have the same processor, but a Mac feels a lot faster and snappier even with equal specs.
Sure it can be done. But the question is, why would anyone want to?
I for one have better things to do with my life. Id rather just browse content on the web and use it for work and leisure instead of babysitting my computer appliance.
-
01-24-2016, 11:46 AM #71
-
01-24-2016, 11:48 AM #72
-
-
01-24-2016, 11:51 AM #73
-
01-24-2016, 11:55 AM #74
-
01-24-2016, 12:25 PM #75
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New York, New York, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 10,421
- Rep Power: 27436
Solid rebuttal, we internet now.
If there are loads of people experiencing the problem, and the Hackintosh brah who just chimed in here agreed that you need specific hardware to run it efficiently, I am pretty sure it makes it a common problem. Dunno how close to the truth are the errors and incompatibilities listed by KingSWRV.Last edited by zinkhan99; 01-24-2016 at 12:35 PM.
-
01-24-2016, 01:05 PM #76
-
-
01-24-2016, 01:09 PM #77
-
01-24-2016, 01:27 PM #78
-
01-24-2016, 02:24 PM #79
Show me a new MacBook at $3500 that is better than this:
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/asus-rog...&skuId=4637110
-
01-24-2016, 02:35 PM #80
That laptop is catering to an entirely different market than what the Macbook does. There's more to life than being able to play games. Some people want longer batter life, quiet, thinner, lighter portable machines. That laptop, while it packs quite a punch, is typically not what these kinds of people are looking for.
-
-
01-24-2016, 04:03 PM #81
-
01-24-2016, 04:08 PM #82
- Join Date: May 2014
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida, United States
- Posts: 5,842
- Rep Power: 18110
I agreed with you until you went full on potato with this statement.
Why buy a $40k BMW brand new when I can buy a $40k F-350 am i right? It has a lot more pulling power and it's bigger and "badder" than the BMW right?
You realize these two laptops target completely different markets and are geared for completely different usage?
This.
-
01-24-2016, 07:37 PM #83
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: Fort Pierce, Florida, United States
- Posts: 4,940
- Rep Power: 2157
-
01-24-2016, 09:08 PM #84
-
-
01-24-2016, 09:22 PM #85
-
01-25-2016, 08:57 AM #86
Was perusing the idiocy in this thread and saw this. I prefer most Linux distros to Windows for a few reasons, but to claim that your Unix based Mac OS is superior to a Windows OS due to the registry shows how little you know about *nix systems and/or Windows.
Windows registry is arguably the same thing as *nix text based conf files, although it could take up more or less space in terms of raw storage (which would be negligible anyway). Every time you install a new program in Windows, yes, it does take up space in the registry. However, *nix systems also take up the same amount of space using conf files. The only difference is ease of access on *nix systems, versus something like Regedit on a Windows machine.
There are a lot of pros and cons on both sides, but claiming Windows Registry to be the root cause of a slow OS boot time or other issues is just ridiculous.
-
01-25-2016, 10:42 AM #87
Mac OS is far superior to windows...at least since I started using a Mac back in 2008, I cant say much about it before that, unless I go back to 89-93' when I used apple in elementary school. I still love my PC though.
Carb Mal-absorption, no breads, sugary snacks, rice, pasta...live off of 30-40g a day.
Eosinophilic eso****itis, cant ingest dairy or my eso****us closes up
-
01-25-2016, 10:50 AM #88
-
-
01-25-2016, 11:12 AM #89
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Location: Ohio, United States
- Age: 30
- Posts: 4,559
- Rep Power: 10881
There are two things about Apple that rustle the fck outta me.
1) supporting the hardware in a windows environment in an organization (working in IT)
2) how everyone assumes windows is garbage and you can't use it for content creation yet you use an underwhelming $500 dual core prebuilt with integrated graphics.*MFC*
*KNEE DRAGGERS UNITE*
*GSD Master Race Crew*
*Currently Making it Crew*
*Registered spreadsheet abuser*
-
01-25-2016, 05:05 PM #90
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,907
- Rep Power: 85705
Bookmarks