|
-
11-16-2015, 07:02 PM #61
-
11-16-2015, 07:02 PM #62
-
11-16-2015, 07:03 PM #63
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Detroit, Michigan, United States
- Age: 29
- Posts: 7,431
- Rep Power: 725
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...-them-20151114
"After Paris Attacks, Don't Close Doors to Refugees – Open Them:The West should do everything in its power to make those fleeing ISIS and extremism feel welcome and wanted"
Liberals are shooting themselves in the foot. People are eventually going to start getting tired of their bs.
-
11-16-2015, 07:04 PM #64
-
-
11-16-2015, 07:05 PM #65
-
11-16-2015, 07:05 PM #66
-
11-16-2015, 07:06 PM #67
As much as I hate the fact of rejecting the 99.99% of the good and innocent refugees, I think it what has to be done. That 0.01% can and will cause alot of damage, that 0.01% will connect with other ISIS sympathizers and will unleash a well planned attack that will kill many. It such a sad situation for the innocent, but its the truth. Rich middle eastern countries need to take them or atleast other countries that are not associated with the funding of Israel need to step up and accept them
-
11-16-2015, 07:11 PM #68
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Detroit, Michigan, United States
- Age: 29
- Posts: 7,431
- Rep Power: 725
my location has nothing to do with this, and this issue is far bigger than refugees. europe is getting destroyed and the PC media is going full retard on the problems with islam in the global world. it's more about addressing the issues with islam, admitting there's a connection with it's religious texts and the barbaric beliefs a large percentage of muslim have. a religion can't be reformed if liberals keep denying there's a problem with the religion and calls everyone a bigot for doing so.
-
-
11-16-2015, 07:13 PM #69
That's why I'm going to marry an Indian girl and let me tell you, we will produce many offspring and it will actually be a great thing.
Brb:
-Indian population is 1.3 billion (80% Hindu)
-They all look out for each other (ones living in US) and have a tight Indian bond that can potentially combat the "religion of peace" population
-Eat curry and wipe ass with hand (alpha)
-Hopefully my male children won't be short...this is a legit fear but it's a risk I'm willing to take
-
11-16-2015, 07:14 PM #70
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40533
750,000 refugees have come to the US since 9/11 and not one has been involved in a terrorist attack.
Why come to the US using the process with the most security screening possible? Why not just over-stay a traveler's visa? Seems like excessive effort when there are much easier ways to get into the US.
-
11-16-2015, 07:16 PM #71
-
11-16-2015, 07:20 PM #72
-
-
11-16-2015, 07:22 PM #73
I completely agree. America needs to be selfish and look out for themselves in this matter. We need to think logically and rationally, and not let our emotions take over. Logically, it is a far safer and smart decision to simply not let them in. It makes so much sense on a national security level that there really is no doubt. Liberals and the "think of the women and children!!!" just has no thought behind it plain and simple.
keep the neg threats out of your sig line
-
11-16-2015, 07:24 PM #74
-
11-16-2015, 07:30 PM #75
-
11-16-2015, 07:30 PM #76
-
-
11-16-2015, 07:33 PM #77
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Age: 35
- Posts: 13,029
- Rep Power: 40533
Actually, letting in Syrian refugees works against the message ISIS puts out to new recruits. It shows that (1) the US/West is not evil and that (2) the supposed caliphate created by ISIS is not actually a caliphate since Muslims are fleeing from it.
Considering combating ISIS's ability to recruit is just as important as actually killing ISIS members (they are recruiting at a rate roughly equal to the rate they are being killed) then letting in refugees is actually an important part of the fight against ISIS.
-
11-16-2015, 07:35 PM #78
-
11-16-2015, 07:36 PM #79
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Location: Flushing, New York, United States
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,015
- Rep Power: 16018
-
11-16-2015, 07:43 PM #80
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,425
- Rep Power: 18917
Urine Idiot.
Edit: You know what, 7rmr makes a lot of sense. Im still not keen on the idea of letting 100k immigrants in here especially if 75% of them are men. Id rather be on the safe side when it comes to this. This coming from a full blooded Syrian who's entire family migrated here about 40 years ago. Every Syrian i talk to living here is against the idea as well.Last edited by flexnation; 11-16-2015 at 07:51 PM.
"If you come at the king, you best not miss"
-Omar Little
-
-
11-16-2015, 08:34 PM #81
-
11-16-2015, 08:39 PM #82
-
11-16-2015, 08:51 PM #83
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Location: Flushing, New York, United States
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,015
- Rep Power: 16018
-
11-16-2015, 09:02 PM #84
It's been confirmed that 1 of the members was a Syrian refugee.
It doesnt matter if it's 1 Syrian refugee or 100 Syrian refugees that are in ISIS. As long as they get through that border, they will connect with other ISIS members/sympathizers and they will launch an attack. This isn't some careless act, it's ****ing heartbreaking, but the USA has to look out of the safety of it's people first before we look out for the safety of others.
-
-
11-16-2015, 09:03 PM #85
-
11-16-2015, 09:18 PM #86
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Location: Flushing, New York, United States
- Age: 31
- Posts: 5,015
- Rep Power: 16018
1 was a Syrian refugee, 4 were French citizens and 3 were Belgian-born French nationals. Should we ban all French muslims from coming to the US as well? I agree with the overall sentiment of your post but to outright blame the all of the refugees for this attack is a little disingenuous.
Last edited by DicedPineapples; 11-16-2015 at 09:57 PM.
Liverpool FC – YNWA
New York City FC
-
11-16-2015, 09:18 PM #87
It's not who we are.
With this logic we might as well put all Syrians into internment camps because they might be close to Syrian refuges and isis affiliates.
This strategy worked out so well for us with the Japanese in ww2. Look up the 442 combat regiment.
This is just politicians making a knee jerk reaction and using it to their advantage to make themselves look good.
There's no guarantee of 100k refugees coming and even that is a drop in the bucket. Do people actually wake up and get concerned about this when you wake up?
These politicians are a ****ing joke and playing off people's emotions. There is no more threat than there has been for america. We have been universally hated by terrorist groups for a longtime.
-
11-16-2015, 09:28 PM #88
Canada is supposed to take in 25K by Christmas. I'd rather have 25K Mexicans instead srs. America doesn't seem to want more. And out of all our immigrant groups, hispanics are almost non-existant. We got enough arabs and muslims - time to let someone else have a shot if we want to be generous. At least hispanics are Christian and partly native to the Americas, and they can shovel snow in winter while they wait for lawn mowing season.
-
-
11-16-2015, 09:32 PM #89
I watched a video recently where a Muslim woman was asking some irrelevant attention seeking question and a high authority woman (forget who she was, maybe someone can link the video) brought up that it's irrelevant that the majority of Islamist Muslims are peaceful, because TWENTY FIVE PERCENT of them were radicals.
In other words, 25,000 of those Muslims are terrorists or potential terrorists.
-
11-16-2015, 09:42 PM #90
Bookmarks