I have read several reports that claim that Ronnie will not retire and will try to compete next year or possibly in 2008. Why?
You are now considered one of the greatest Mr. Olympias in the history of our sport and you've tied Lee Haney's record with 8 Mr. O's. What is there left to prove?
Yes Ronnie lost on the Olympia stage to his rival Jay Cutler and that is a tough pill to swallow, but why come back again? Just to say you've won it nine times and be in the lead? Bow out gracefully and enjoy your reputation and accomplishments become stuff of bodybuilding legend. What will happen if your come back and lose again? It will be like Dan Marino, Jonny U, and Brett Farve, instead of going out on top they kept/keep coming back and looking worse and worse and tarishing their legacies. Don't do that to yourself Ron. Just retire and enjoy life, we will never forget you and you will be a legend in the future for sure.
Just my 2 cents.
|
Thread: Ronnie, Why?
-
10-02-2006, 07:48 AM #1
Ronnie, Why?
-
10-02-2006, 07:53 AM #2
It's similar to things you see in every sport.
why did Jordan come back when he was already considered the greatest of all time?
why was Ali still fighting when he was pushing 40?
When you were once at the very top of your profession, it must be DAMN HARD having to watch someone else take the limelight whilst your in the shadows, that's what Ronnie is gonna have to live with unless somehow he can return next year and win, which I doubt, to be frank.
-
10-02-2006, 07:56 AM #3
-
10-02-2006, 07:56 AM #4
-
-
10-02-2006, 07:57 AM #5
-
10-02-2006, 07:58 AM #6
-
10-02-2006, 08:04 AM #7
Don't look at it from the "he feels the need to prove a point" perspective. Look at it from the "he really loves bodybuilding" perspective. That's why I never understood the Jordan bashing. If the dude was too old and washed up to play in the NBA, he loved the sport so much that he probably would have still been playing pick-up games against fierce competition on the streets of Chicago.
The same goes for Ronnie. Even if he chose to never do the Olympia again-- or even compete in some small podunk local shows, for that matter-- Ronnie loves being a bodybuilder and living the lifestyle. That being the case, he's going to do whatever makes him happy. I hope he continues to enjoy himself.
-lifepulse
-
10-02-2006, 08:53 AM #8Originally Posted by Big Ern
I give full credit to jay, he looked really really good.
BUT I thinka major reason ronnie lost was because of his lat issue. Jay dominated the lat spread and back poses.
IF, and that is a big IF ronnie can stay injury free and come back I think he could win again. If I was healthy I would give it one more shot if I was ronnie.
Let's say he tries again and gets 3rd or 4th, so what?? Maybe he will win it.
now don't get me wrong, I don't want to see him trying to win the "O" until he is 65 years old and having 10 years in a row where he is not in the top 15. I do NOT want him to do that.
But if he can be injury free, why not give it a go one more time?
-
-
10-02-2006, 08:56 AM #9
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 35
- Posts: 2,824
- Rep Power: 0
If he does come back and win, imo he will undisputedly become the greatest Olympia champion of all time....When Champions lose, they don't quit..your heart is truly tested when you have to get up and come back from a loss.
No Olympia Champion has never lost and come back to win again, it's unheard of.This one's for you baby
-
10-02-2006, 08:57 AM #10
-
10-02-2006, 09:01 AM #11
-
10-02-2006, 09:01 AM #12Originally Posted by lifepulse
I guess you are right about jordan and the other athletes, but when they retire that's it for them. In bodybuilding ronnie can do guest posing, seminars, dvd's, push products, open his own product line, and so much more in the bodybuilding world besides competeting. What I'm saying is that he can still be "in" the bodybuilding world and not tarnish his legacy. Look at Dorian Yates, and Lee Lebrata, Lee Haney, Arnold, Rich Gaspiri (sp). The end of competeting isn't the end all together. Hey there's always the Master's O
-
-
10-02-2006, 09:07 AM #13Originally Posted by Flex500
But one thing concerns me and people may or may not agree, im concerned that ronnie is falling in love with the mass game and is now starting to beat himself. He plays the game very well, but at some point you gotta take a step back and go for quality over quantity. Reggie miller is the greatest 3 point shooter in NBA history and had every right to fall in love with the shot but after taking so many you begin to miss, and you gotta settle for 2 pointers to win the game.
I know its totally against the grain to tell and bodybuilder to stop getting bigger, but ronnies at a point now that if he dropped 10-15lbs. tightened that gut up and came in looking sharp he would still be unbeatable. Rather than try to coming in at 300lbs this year and 305-310 next year looking bloated and blurry. I dont know just my opinion, sometimes you gotta slow down to go fast.
-
10-02-2006, 09:13 AM #14
-
10-02-2006, 09:18 AM #15Originally Posted by Guardian
-
10-02-2006, 09:34 AM #16Originally Posted by coldfusion71
From what Ive seen Ronnie was the hardest and most conditioned in 1998-1999.
http://www.steelfactor.ru/photos/coleman_ronnie/63.jpg
Check out the side abdominal area
-
-
10-02-2006, 09:34 AM #17Originally Posted by coldfusion71
Thats true but i think there has to be a balance to it. when your 5'10" and 300lbs in contest shape, even if you totally injury free it is incredibly hard to come in is great shape seperation and totally dry. I look at ronnies video "The Unbelievable" and its insane how much better he looks in that video compared to on the road 2005 and this year. he had insane definition and seperation especially in those shoulders, his stomach was tight he looked great.
All im saying is as he put on more and more weight it gets more and more difficult to juggle all those balls, of symetry, seperations, tight stomach, zero water. 300lbs just aint gonna allow all that to happen. hes gotta take it back a notch or two so he can manage himself better. if ronnie of 98' got onstage with ronnie of 06 even 05 i would give it to ronni of 98-99 the man looked that damn good back that and each time him comes in heavier and heavier he looses a little quality for the sake of quantity
-
10-02-2006, 09:36 AM #18
You have to put yourself into his shoes...
Originally Posted by Big Ern
-
10-02-2006, 09:43 AM #19Originally Posted by Hardwork
dude this is going to happen with anyone who wins the olympia, they think to themselves "how can i differentiate myself from the current competitors" the first thing is going to be size. conditioning is so close the best way to stick out is to be bigger. if you want to continually win you cannot come in the same size over and over that is why phil heath didnt compete in the olympia. the same presentation over and over again will lead to complacency. all you have to see is dexter for a prime example of that all you hear is complaining he always comes in at the same size.
-
10-02-2006, 09:49 AM #20
-
-
10-02-2006, 09:50 AM #21
don't overlook the fact that Coleman got 2nd place.....with a messed up lat!?!?!! Everything else was good......cripes his legs are twice the size of Culter's! He just needed to dry up a little more. If he can re-group after this minor hurdle.....train hard, let the back heal.....I am more than positive that he will come back next year and take first again......no doubts in my mind at all.
he finally has some competition!
-
10-02-2006, 09:54 AM #22
-
10-02-2006, 09:56 AM #23Originally Posted by Guardian
-
10-02-2006, 10:03 AM #24Originally Posted by coldfusion71
All Im saying is that Ronnie looked better imo from 1998-1999 and some people agree with that. I dont see what the point is of getting large and at the same time sacrificing other areas just for the saking of looking different then the year before.
Jay Cutler got larger then 01 and looked worse, and unlike Ronnie people pointed it out. Guess what Cutler came in smaller this year then last and beat the 300 pound champion. What does that tell you?
Quality over quantity, thats why cutler won.
-
-
10-02-2006, 10:06 AM #25
-
10-02-2006, 10:14 AM #26Originally Posted by Guardian
ummm no cutler looked good in relation to a injured and badly condtioned coleman, he didnt win because his physique had some sort of metamorphisis, he was a benefactor of bad circumstances for ronnie. to say cutler came in smaller is kind of assinine if he was smaller it was like by 5 pounds if that, not that much of a difference that is not a make or break structural detail. i dont know if ronnie was in fact 300 this year, you are relating wins and loses directly to weight when there is no direct correlation between the 2. there is alot more that explains the loss, it is not as if ronnie hit 300 automatic loss. if he could hit 300 with great conditioning and no injury he would win but that was not the case. the weight has nothing to do with ,it if he had conditioning relative to his weight he wouldve won he didnt so he lost. youa re talking as if cutler is the embodiment of a aesthetic physique, when he is the complete antithesis of it.
-
10-02-2006, 10:15 AM #27
-
10-02-2006, 10:42 AM #28Originally Posted by coldfusion71
If ronnie gets his suck muscle sepration back like he had in 98-99 that will stand out way more than added mass.
Thas why jay was losing and that why ronnie is losing now, they think or thought "hey all i have to do is just keep packing on the size and i'll be okay". NO i dont work that way. theres a lot of things ronnie and many other bodybuilder with that type of mass can do to improve and STAND OUT besides adding size, it a fun road while your driving on it, but it has a dead end
-
-
10-02-2006, 11:08 AM #29
-
10-02-2006, 11:28 AM #30
Bookmarks