How to reconcile science and religion (Christianity)

[WiseOldApe]

So I've experienced many paranormal things and in the end realised that Jesus Christ really is God which was demonstrated to me when I had an exorcism done to me, etc.

I'm also not the only one, there's many people online who have gone into new age practices like yoga, reiki, witchcraft, etc and come out the other side possessed by a spirit (demon) and been delivered from said demon through the power of Jesus Christ. There's no denying this to me.

But when it comes to the bible, it's not the most scientific book around - in fact the bible is pretty adamant that the Earth is flat, which is pretty easy to disprove if you just look at stuff like moon phases, etc.

So this leaves me to conclude that God/Jesus is real, but the bible isn't exactly covering everything or that God doesn't really know much about His creation, i.e., God doesn't realise he created a planet and not a firmament.

Then comes evolution, which makes sense and all, but once again, it does not really fit in with what I or many many others have experienced in terms of the spiritual realm.

[ikytdsutwvc]

What do you make of this;

Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve? - Extraterrestrial Knowledge (Pleiades-Taygeta)

https://swaruu.org/transcripts/pyram...eiades-taygeta

[WiseOldApe]

What do you make of this;

Pyramids-How Were They Built and What Do They Serve? - Extraterrestrial Knowledge (Pleiades-Taygeta)

https://swaruu.org/transcripts/pyram...eiades-taygeta

Judging by the size and scale of the pyramids I'd say that they definitely had some very important use(s) to the culture that made them - my personal opinion is that they're tied to the ancient egyptian religion in some way.

[isingmodel]

Christianity is polytheism/paganism.

[HaiMeesk]

Siting faith or truth are irrelevant. Acknowledge it's all about wealth and power and it will all make simpler sense.

[WiseOldApe]

Siting faith or truth are irrelevant. Acknowledge it's all about wealth and power and it will all make simpler sense.

It's just that I've experienced things spiritually that can't be explained by science - and many others have experienced the same exact thing.

[DarthCholo]

the most based counter argument to an atheist is to challenge them to justify the basis of any morals humans hold. If we're just animals, or clump of cells, then any behavior we do like suicide, murder, abortion etc.. is just a non-judgemental instinct of our biology and should not be judged or argued based on morals. we must just judge our selves as animals that we are instead.

[sooby]

the most based counter argument to an atheist is to challenge them to justify the basis of any morals humans hold. If we're just animals, or clump of cells, then any behavior we do like suicide, murder, abortion etc.. is just a non-judgemental instinct of our biology and should not be judged or argued based on morals. we must just judge our selves as animals that we are instead.

I doubt most atheists hold a purely materialist view of the universe. at least if they've dived enough into it on a basic level they would realize how completely retarded it is.

I think they would argue that animals to a degree exhibit a level of morality (albeit limited) and morals is something that has evolved in humans along side other things in order to create a cohesive and strong society. Not sure what the evidence for this is. And they certainly can't explain how morality came to be either from non-living entities.

However, many different societies have developed it's own set of morals, even outside of religion. There's not really any objective way to prove which society's set of morals are superior because it can also depend on the situation the society finds itself in. For example maybe a society may restrict and limit women in terms of careers. But maybe that society is facing a huge shortage of births in which if it doesn't change, the society implodes. So is it immoral to restrict freedoms in that way, or is it immoral for the society to go on a path of destruction. That can also be the downside of human morality, it simply just changes and shifts overall based on geopolitical situations, whoever comes into power, whoever wields the most influence, etc. Maybe they would look at western countries and their prosperity as evidence for their superior morals but we all know that societies prosper and crumble for a variety of different reasons. And a lot of the morals we have nowadays are really just in a testing phase, it's never been done for the thousands of previous years.


And often times there are contradictions in said morals. For example, a lot of liberals will say "love is love" but on what moral basis would they deny a consenting biological brother and biological sister loving/marrying each other? They'll come up with a whole bunch of coping arguments like "well genetic defects, the potential of abuse, general feeling of disgust, etc". But none of this addresses the morality of it. And these are even self-defeating arguments because lesbian relationships have the highest chance of abuse, h0m0 relationships have the highest spread of STDs, etc but it's all h0m0phobic to point that out.