Trumps best refugee analogy yet

[mtpockets]

Tweet from Don Trump jr

[bodyhard]

That is a f'king awesome analogy, but I saw that tweet from his son, not the Don himself.

[mtpockets]

That is a f'king awesome analogy, but I saw that tweet from his son, not the Don himself.

Yeah I screwed up....the title should have read Jr...

it's great tho

[dbx]

That is a f'king awesome analogy, but I saw that tweet from his son, not the Don himself.

Yeah, it was his son. And now the candy company is freaking about being associated with it .

[CaptChip40]

Poor skittles can't catch a break, first Micheal Brown steals a pack and gets killed by police now they are the food choice of illegal alien terrorist.

[bodyhard]

Yeah, it was his son. And now the candy company is freaking about being associated with it .

Because we have been pussifed to no end, if he used popcorn, they would have been offended, if he used M&M's they would have been offended. Everyone is so f'cking afraid of just accepting this obvious fact, that they put their head in a hole and their tales between their legs....

[Old-Time-Lifter]

Sad to say it's a very accurate analogy.

[bodyhard]

Sad to say it's a very accurate analogy.

Why is it sad though Roy? There is nothing sad about a fact.

Hell I can go into the streets, pick up 50 homeless people, bring them to my home to help them out. Out of those 50 if only 1 causes harm to my family while we sleep, i.e. kill my children, it would be my stupidity for bringing them into my home in the first place, even though my initial intention was good.

There is nothing sad behind stupidity.

[bodyhard]

The refugees sometimes cannot stay where they are, and if nobody's taking them, (yet they cannot stay)i it is a bad situation for them also.

It doesn't matter, my family comes first before any stranger 100 percent of the time, it is a no brainer. In short I say f'ck em.

[machined]

Misleading. They can't say with certainty that 3 in the bowl will kill us. Until then its all just hyperbole, and not a reason to exclude the refugees. Humanitarianism in any form regardless of the risk is simply the right thing to do. Even if we knew that 3 would kill us, how much workplace violence can a few rogue refugees really cause in a country of over 300 million? Until we have irrefutable evidence that lives will be lost, we need to do the right thing and let them in.

[mtpockets]

[Cass40]

It doesn't matter, my family comes first before any stranger 100 percent of the time, it is a no brainer. In short I say f'ck em.

Don't worry, they already are very much fu'cked.

[Old-Time-Lifter]

Misleading. They can't say with certainty that 3 in the bowl will kill us. Until then its all just hyperbole, and not a reason to exclude the refugees. Humanitarianism in any form regardless of the risk is simply the right thing to do. Even if we knew that 3 would kill us, how much workplace violence can a few rogue refugees really cause in a country of over 300 million? Until we have irrefutable evidence that lives will be lost, we need to do the right thing and let them in.

Of course ISIS did tell the world that they would sneak agents in among the refugees and unless you've been living under a rock you certainly have seen in the news the violence that has come about in Europe from these refugees. Most isn't neccessarily terrorist acts (yet) but they are terrorizing folks for certain.

Who said it would be workplace violence? Easy to say that it's okay if a few die, as long as it's not one of your loved ones. Every death by a terrorists was somebody's loved one. Granted all of these refugees are also someone's loved one and that's why I'm 1000% behind humanitarian aid to the refugees. BUT, we need to help them over there not bring them here. We should also put pressure on the other Arab countries to step up and do their part.

[bodyhard]

Don't worry, they already are very much fu'cked.

Then why bother?

[machined]

Who said it would be workplace violence? Easy to say that it's okay if a few die, as long as it's not one of your loved ones. Every death by a terrorists was somebody's loved one.

Everything you've said is accurate.

That said, MSNBC and the mayor of NYC expressly stated that these latest bombings were random acts of violence and absolutely not terrorism, and that most so called terrorism is actually just workplace violence (at worst, hate crimes). In fact, the latest criminal captured in NY was dressed in a security guard uniform when he perpetrated his crimes, which indicates workplace violence.

Even the chief of Police in Minn stated that there was no conclusive evidence that the mall stabbings were terrorism. It couldn't be confirmed exactly what the perpetrator was yelling at the time because none of the mall patrons understood Arabic.

Regarding the loss of loved one's to terrorism, if that is a chance our government is willing to take in the name of humanitarianism, then it must be just.

So much conflicting information. Both positions are arguable. What to do. Tough election.

[so-tex]

Granted all of these refugees are also someone's loved one and that's why I'm 1000% behind humanitarian aid to the refugees. BUT, we need to help them over there not bring them here.

We could bring them over here, let our military train them, then send them back to their country and let them fight to get it back.

[Old-Time-Lifter]

I say at the very least we put them all up somewhere isolated like next to some Indian reservation out in bumf*ck South Dakota or something with really nice tents

provide some humanitarian aid out there and see if they can live amongst themselves before expecting them to live in a culture that's gonna seem like planet Mars to them...

start them out with a walmart and a liquor store and see if they can slowly assimilate into our culture ...

maybe they can tutor the indians out there on how to get their sh*t together after a couple years or so !

Having come from South Dakota, I can tell you that I doubt the NA's want them up there at all.

Best scenario is to leave them in the Middle East, then send as much aid as is needed to them. BUT, we need to get the rich Arab nations to do the lion share of the aid. The biggest problem over there is that the different stripes of Muslims hate each other as much or more than they hate others. It's time they bury the hatchet and start joining the modern world as well. Bringing them here is just going to cause trouble.

And calling these attacks anything but terrorism is not helping the world out at all. We have to as BH says have the balls to call a spade a spade and a f&cking shovel a shovel.

[bodyhard]

I say at the very least we put them all up somewhere isolated like next to some Indian reservation out in bumf*ck South Dakota or something with really nice tents

provide some humanitarian aid out there and see if they can live amongst themselves before expecting them to live in a culture that's gonna seem like planet Mars to them...

start them out with a walmart and a liquor store and see if they can slowly assimilate into our culture ...

maybe they can tutor the indians out there on how to get their sh*t together after a couple years or so !

LOL OS for POTUS!!!

[acrawlingchaos]

What if all those skittles where firearm owners, and 3 of them were mentally unstable?

Safety right?

[Cass40]

what if this was a thread about stinky Arabs and candy and not gun rights ?

You'd think Jeff knew the fallacies of arguments by now!

[acrawlingchaos]

what if this was a thread about stinky Arabs and candy and not gun rights ?

What if...

[acrawlingchaos]

You'd think Jeff knew the fallacies of arguments by now!

Indeed

[so-tex]

What if...

Yeah, let's play the what if game.
What if 3 of those skittles were 3 Chicago gang members hopped up on PCP?
What if... 3 of those skittles wore Trump t-shirts at a black lives matter rally?
Damn, we could play the what if game all fukcin' day couldn't we.

[so-tex]

What if....
3 of those skittles were Pollacks at a German Beer garden?

[Old-Time-Lifter]

What if all those skittles where firearm owners, and 3 of them were mentally unstable?

Safety right?

As you know a gun is just a tool. If someone is unstable they can find no end of tools to cause mayhem. Guns (such as in the case fo the knife attack in MN where the attack was stopped by a man with a gun) actaully save lives, you and I both know this.

The fact that a gun is just a tool is driven home by these bomb and knife attacks. Bad folks can find no end of weaponry... this is not news to either of us.

And yes, I know you were just making a smart remark, problem is some folks are just uninformed enough to think it's a valid comparison.

[bodyhard]

Damn if we are playing the what if game, can I play that those skittles present hot gorgeous females that are willing to f'ck my brains out, let me f'ck them in the ass, never say a f'cking word and be my love slaves? But 3 of them are there to cut my dick off with a rusted knife.

Cause I would take them ALL in and take my chances!!

[acrawlingchaos]

And yes, I know you were just making a smart remark, problem is some folks are just uninformed enough to think it's a valid comparison.

Yes, to be clear, I am not in favor of restrictive firearms laws.

Yeah, let's play the what if game.
What if 3 of those skittles were 3 Chicago gang members hopped up on PCP?
What if... 3 of those skittles wore Trump t-shirts at a black lives matter rally?
Damn, we could play the what if game all fukcin' day couldn't we.

This was my point. The what if analogy isn't really a solid argument. It seems a little like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

[Brackneyc]

As you know a gun is just a tool.

People are tools. In some cases, fcking tools.

[thomashenry]

Misleading. They can't say with certainty that 3 in the bowl will kill us. Until then its all just hyperbole, and not a reason to exclude the refugees. Humanitarianism in any form regardless of the risk is simply the right thing to do. Even if we knew that 3 would kill us, how much workplace violence can a few rogue refugees really cause in a country of over 300 million? Until we have irrefutable evidence that lives will be lost, we need to do the right thing and let them in.

Boston, San Bernadino, Ft Hood and Orlando are the 1st things that come to mind "In the United States", and While your Promoting Humanitarianism being Altruistic , why not suggest a Refugee tax, compelling hard working Tax payers to instead of Confiscating the Fruits of our Labor under the Guise of Paying our Fair share, make it compulsory that way we would feel better, being benevolent and all

[dbx]

Damn if we are playing the what if game, can I play that those skittles present hot gorgeous females that are willing to f'ck my brains out, let me f'ck them in the ass, never say a f'cking word and be my love slaves? But 3 of them are there to cut my dick off with a rusted knife.

Cause I would take them ALL in and take my chances!!

This would be an example of "Extreme Vetting."