MSNBC host whines there won't be "a free press" when Trump wins again

[NYPat]

You forgot to actually tell us why, with a cited source...

I didn't forget anything, I said I know why and I have a source.

Now ask dumbfuk who made the claim to produce his source you fuking hypocrite.

[fitnessislife]

This mongoloid watches Rachel Maddow and thinks what she says is fact


LMAO



The jokes write themselves

And he thinks he's somehow qualified to discuss what is and isn't legitimate news. It's hilarious.

So he's a "fascist" thst left the mandates, restrictions and lockdowns up to the states? A "fascist" that played a ton of golf?.

A "Fascist" that had press conferences with the media, with no pre-scripted questions and no pre-written answers on a weekly basis?

They literally believe this.

[NYPat]

This mongoloid watches Rachel Maddow and thinks what she says is fact


LMAO



The jokes write themselves

Tied between this braindead moron and Jay350 for dumbest poster on the forum.

And he thinks he's somehow qualified to discuss what is and isn't legitimate news. It's hilarious.

Another idiot challenger appears.

[Polaris]

I didn't forget anything, I said I know why and I have a source.

Now ask dumbfuk who made the claim to produce his source you fuking hypocrite.

Sure you do. Salon.com? Maybe the Occupy Democrats group on ********?

[NYPat]

Sure you do. Salon.com? Maybe the Occupy Democrats group on ********?

What does it matter? You people will call it fake news no matter what.

Btw I'm still waiting on the guy I responded to to actually back up the stupid claims he made and provide a source for it..

[Polaris]

What does it matter? You people will call it fake news no matter what.

I feel like I have seen someone demonstrate that exact behavior here before...

[fitnessislife]

Another idiot challenger appears.

Rachel Maddow viewer says what?

What does it matter? You people will call it fake news no matter what.

Btw I'm still waiting on the guy I responded to to actually back up the stupid claims he made and provide a source for it..

Psst - that's because it is fake news. You know, just like the nonsense that you still believe in like the myth of Russian collusion.

[NYPat]

Rachel Maddow viewer says what?

Says her show is excellent. It's still on the air you know. Unlike the intentionally lying and now fired Tucker Carlson who cost his company a billion dollars for it.

Inb4 you never, ever, never watched him or posted links to him...

[fitnessislife]

Says her show is excellent..

[InPhase]

I didn't forget anything, I said I know why and I have a source.

Now ask dumbfuk who made the claim to produce his source you fuking hypocrite.

I'm not going to lie and claim I have a source, unlike you. So go ahead, provide evidence of your claim. Bet you avoid this thread from now on and don't post a damn thing, because we all know it's what you continually do. Just disappear when someone asks for evidence. Such a weak ****.

[WCline]

So he's a "fascist" thst left the mandates, restrictions and lockdowns up to the states? A "fascist" that played a ton of golf?.

A "Fascist" that had press conferences with the media, with no pre-scripted questions and no pre-written answers on a weekly basis?

A fascist that argues he is above the law? A fascist that bragged he could shoot someone and his supporters would defend him? A fascist who said he wanted to be dictator for a day, and refused to rule out seeking retaliation against his opponents? A fascist who denied election results and attempted to carry out an insurrection? A fascist who has threatened judges, election officials, and jurors?

[NYPat]

I'm not going to lie and claim I have a source, unlike you. So go ahead, provide evidence of your claim. Bet you avoid this thread from now on and don't post a damn thing, because we all know it's what you continually do. Just disappear when someone asks for evidence. Such a weak ****.

So you just lied and made a claim you couldn't back up. Gotcha. That's EXACTLY my point when I called you out.

And I have zero reason to provide proof I know why they really met, unlike your false claim, but here you go.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/11/u...than-wade.html

[InPhase]

So you just lied and made a claim you couldn't back up. Gotcha. That's EXACTLY my point when I called you out.

And I have zero reason to provide proof I know why they really met, unlike your false claim, but here you go.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/11/u...than-wade.html

Firewall dumbarse.

And your "source" is a left wing rag famous for making **** up. I'm sure they are right about this one.

Everyone knows that Biden was in on the charges. They specifically met with him on numerous occassions before the charges were laid. But must be just a coincidence right, you gullible clown. You'd believe anything they told you.

[WCline]

Does the press actually understand Trump has been President once, and we know how he governed... so it's just irrational to claim he'll do the exact opposite if re-elected?

It's actually very unclear what he will do. He insisted he surrounded himself with the best people. Now, nearly his entire former cabinet has turned on him. So, yes. It is not obvious what he will do at all.

[NYPat]

Firewall dumbarse.

And your "source" is a left wing rag famous for making **** up. I'm sure they are right about this one.

Everyone knows that Biden was in on the charges. They specifically met with him on numerous occassions before the charges were laid. But must be just a coincidence right, you gullible clown. You'd believe anything they told you.

Funny how I'm able to read the article without paying..

And my source is legit, just not to Trumpers who make up chit and provide zero sources at all.

And no, everyone doesn't know Biden was in on the charges, you just made that up - which you admitted to.

The fuking irony though of you claiming I'd disappear from this thread when someone asks for evidence..

[WCline]

Funny how I'm able to read the article without paying..

And my source is legit, just not to Trumpers who make up chit and provide zero sources at all.

And no, everyone doesn't know Biden was in on the charges, you just made that up - which you admitted to.

The fuking irony though of you claiming I'd disappear from this thread when someone asks for evidence..

He's mentally ill. Imagine being a rabid nationalist in Australia, a country, founded by prisoners, that lost a war to birds. His people are a disgrace, not only to our species, but also to mammals. SAD!

[Jayzuz]

He's mentally ill. Imagine being a rabid nationalist in Australia, a country, founded by prisoners, that lost a war to birds. His people are a disgrace, not only to our species, but also to mammals. SAD!

Chinkcel calling someone else mentally ill lol.

[WCline]

Chinkcel calling someone else mentally ill lol.

You have a gene that makes your armpit stink when you sweat lmao.

[Jayzuz]

You have a gene that makes your armpit stink when you sweat lmao.

Yeah I’m sure that worse than being an ugly micro dik midget with the test levels of a female.

You’re the bottom of the food chain boyo, don’t forget your place in life.

[WCline]

Yeah I’m sure that worse than being an ugly micro dik midget with the test levels of a female.

You’re the bottom of the food chain boyo, don’t forget your place in life.

At least I can solve differential equations.

[nutsy54]

A fascist that argues he is above the law? A fascist that bragged he could shoot someone and his supporters would defend him? A fascist who said he wanted to be dictator for a day, and refused to rule out seeking retaliation against his opponents? A fascist who denied election results and attempted to carry out an insurrection? A fascist who has threatened judges, election officials, and jurors?

It's sad when someone doesn't know the meaning of a word... yet bases an entire ranting post on that word and a pack of lies

[nutsy54]

It's actually very unclear what he will do.

Explain any rational reason to believe he wouldn't do exactly what he did during his first term...

[WCline]

It's sad when someone doesn't know the meaning of a word... yet bases an entire ranting post on that word and a pack of lies

I'm well aware of what I mean by the word, and how your party seeks to turn this into an illiberal democracy like Russia.

[WCline]

Explain any rational reason to believe he wouldn't do exactly what he did during his first term...

Well, for starters, we already know he had a falling out with the foreign policy establishment. He is likely to oppose them on Ukraine, for better or for worse. We also know this is his second and final legal term. His supporters are already promoting the idea of a third term.

His first term, he denied the election result and supported attempts to use fake electors and decertify the vote. So, let's assume you are right, and he will try to rig the election result again. Why should I, as a citizen of a formerly liberal democracy, support this man?

Also, regarding my concerns on Gaza, Trump has signaled total commitment to Israel in a way even Biden hasn't. I cannot count on Trump to do anything properly about the humanitarian situation. I also know Trump's picks for SCOTUS resulted in the Dobbs ruling, which, if you have been paying attention, has exacerbated abortion crackdowns all over the country to extremes that Trump himself doesn't seem to support.

A second Trump term could open the door to far more extreme legal transformations, such as a removal of term limits on the presidency, rigged elections, the resurrection of the Comstock acts, and other actions. I see no benefit to his continued existence, frankly, and I think he has been very deleterious for this country.

[fitnessislife]

A second Trump term could open the door to far more extreme legal transformations, such as a removal of term limits on the presidency, rigged elections, the resurrection of the Comstock acts, and other actions. I see no benefit to his continued existence, frankly, and I think he has been very deleterious for this country.