|
-
10-03-2022, 11:50 AM #91
-
10-03-2022, 11:58 AM #92
Cool. Fortunately, your opinions hold no weight on any level anywhere, and developing vaccines have always been a core part of every pandemic response plan we have devised, and have also been used successfully in pandemics in history.
The underlying technology existed and has been trialled for a long time. This is a rough timeline:
Yes we had not yet created a complete-to-market mRNA vaccine yet, but how that leads to the conclusion that we shouldn't have tried to do so for COVID19, is something only a potato mind devoid of any reality can tell us.
3.) my claim was “we had never successfully created a vaccine for a coronavirus” to which you responded”
OK? And due to the scale of COVID19, and the massive amounts of resources put into developing vaccines for it, we have successfully created both mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines for a coronavirus.Misc Crypto Crew
BTC to $200k
-
-
10-03-2022, 12:02 PM #93Miscers on peedophile porn:
x-trainer ben - "defending the right to own( where have we heard this b4?) is not tacit approval, it is simply defending the right......to own.
navid93 - "If these books promote peedophilia then they should be removed, if there’s just a peedo scene I think it’s fine
MinisterOfLust - "She may not be legal where I live, but I am pretty sure that's not the case in Paris, France, or Acapilco Mexico. You just have to respect the law of the land ;)"
-
10-03-2022, 12:16 PM #94
It’s not just me, plenty of leading minds in the field said it was a bad idea.
The underlying technology existed and has been trialled for a long time. This is a rough timeline:
Yes we had not yet created a complete-to-market mRNA vaccine yet, but how that leads to the conclusion that we shouldn't have tried to do so for COVID19, is something only a potato mind devoid of any reality can tell us.
OK? And due to the scale of COVID19, and the massive amounts of resources put into developing vaccines for it, we have successfully created both mRNA and non-mRNA vaccines for a coronavirus.
Lol, no we haven’t. Thanks for answering the thread question though+positive crew+
-we all gonna make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all things in moderation, even political views crew
-support local farms crew
-try to do at least one good deed/day crew
-less cursing the darkness and more lighting candles crew
-
10-03-2022, 12:18 PM #95
-
10-03-2022, 12:21 PM #96
The disease is still here.
There are multiple variants. No one has been able to guess how it's going to mutate.
The vaccine didn't arrive until well into the second set of lockdowns was underway.
There were no real differences between places that high vax rates and restrictions versus those that didn't.
-
-
10-03-2022, 12:38 PM #97
No one with any credibility/empirical justification behind them, no public health agency, no one of any relevance ever said developing vaccines during the pandemic was a bad idea.
I didn’t say we shouldn’t try. Again your reading comprehension is absolutely terrible. In 2020 we had not developed a successful vaccine using the technology. Sure we could try, but any reasonable person would realize the odds were extremely low. Why? Because you should almost never bet on something happening for the first time. Why? Because it’s so rare. First things only happen once. Why would I expect that we had been working on the technology for so long with bad results then suddenly make it work just in time to result in billions of dollars in profits? And to make it even worse, we told the people working on it “don’t worry, if anything goes wrong we’ll make sure you can’t be held responsible”. That is a recipe that GUARANTEES shortcuts and fudged data, the opposite of what we would want when trying to produce a legit product.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...64410X19305626
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475249/
Interim results from a first-in-human, escalating-dose, phase 1 H10N8 study show very high seroconversion rates, demonstrating robust prophylactic immunity in humans. Adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate with only a few severe and no serious events. These data show that LNP-formulated, modified mRNA vaccines can induce protective immunogenicity with acceptable tolerability profiles.
Lol, no we haven’t.Misc Crypto Crew
BTC to $200k
-
10-03-2022, 01:20 PM #98
-
10-03-2022, 01:28 PM #99
-
10-03-2022, 04:27 PM #100
-
-
10-03-2022, 04:29 PM #101
-
10-03-2022, 04:59 PM #102
-
10-03-2022, 05:23 PM #103
-
10-03-2022, 05:35 PM #104
-
-
10-03-2022, 05:37 PM #105
-
10-03-2022, 05:40 PM #106
-
10-03-2022, 05:43 PM #107
-
10-03-2022, 05:49 PM #108
-
-
10-03-2022, 06:52 PM #109
Quick Patricia, bring up Bill Phillips again to prove your point......
I'm never getting the jab Patty, and I'm keeping my job. Your worthless ass believed I should be fired for refusing the jab, that a business should be sued if an unvaccinated employee gave a customer the Rona.
Imagine being so ignorant in your 50s.
-
10-03-2022, 06:57 PM #110
-
10-03-2022, 07:10 PM #111
-
10-03-2022, 07:13 PM #112
The latest vaxxcell retardation is lying and saying natural immunity only lasts weeks. No data. Not even a junk study. Just making chit up on that one.
I think it's because we see with our own eyes people mutli-jabbed and boosted getting covid over and over, and they then attribute the failure to natural immunity. As if that is the problem.All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
-
-
10-03-2022, 07:31 PM #113
Your inability to distinguish between the the media and health agencies has you blaming the wrong entities. To my knowledge, the CDC never made any broad hypocritical statements regarding viral transmission (or a lack thereof) during social justice protests vs say, Trump protests. If you can find contradictory recommendations/statements then yes, the hypocrisy should be condemned and I’ll do it with you. But I’m not aware of that happening.
Headlines like “ Over 1,000 health professionals sign a letter…” had people screaming hypocrisy at the CDC. But that letter didn’t represent the CDC or the scientific consensus. That number might be <1% of medical experts. And with the BLM letter that was propagated by the media, it wasn’t health professionals, it was “public health advocates” and it had no educational standard to sign it.
The disproportionate impact on black Americans is well established. It’s not that the virus is “racist,” it’s that preexisting sociodemographic characteristics caused increased vulnerability."Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
-
10-03-2022, 07:47 PM #114
-
10-03-2022, 08:12 PM #115
-
10-03-2022, 08:35 PM #116
-
-
10-03-2022, 09:20 PM #117
-
10-03-2022, 10:10 PM #118
They acknowledged this early on even..
Immunity to the Coronavirus May Last Years, New Data Hint
Blood samples from recovered patients suggest a powerful, long-lasting immune response, researchers reported.
(Published 2020)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/...ch-news/12021/
meanwhile..
-
10-03-2022, 10:13 PM #119
-
10-04-2022, 04:32 AM #120
Bookmarks