Rand Paul ethers Stephanopoulos on vote fraud

[Stizzel]

The reason libs dont want you to talk about this anymore is because they have to make fools of themselves to defend it

https://thenationalpulse.com/breakin...ul-vote-fraud/

WATCH: Rand Paul Destroys ABC’s Stephanopoulos Over ‘Voter Fraud Big Lie

In addition to Senate Paul slamming Stephanopoulos’s clear left-wing, anti-Trump bias several times, he also insisted that “the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur.”

“In my state, where we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls. […] In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically, those were thrown out. This time they weren’t,” he explains.

Senator Paul adds to his compelling case of voter fraud that there is a possibility election-related lawsuits could “work their way up to the Supreme Court”:

There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature. To me, those are clearly unconstitutional and I think there is still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court.

[nin-com-poop]

I sensed a little Ron Paul watching the clip but in a more aggressive tone coming from Rand.

[plsmire]

I’m surprised Rand Paul didn’t call them out on Russia Collusion. I mean that statement of “the election wasn’t stolen”, how can people not see how suspicious that behaviour is for a journalist to take a hard stance on that issue and not hear the other side.

Now if that journalist had the same resounding statements about Russia collusion 4 years ago “stfu there was no Russia collusion since you have no proof” then fair enough, he’s at least consistent. But if he didn’t, then he’s dishonest and a propagandist for one party - he should just outright admit that.

[Murrmanski]

I like Rand but he could have handled that better tbh

Steph has the emotional resolve of the teenage girl so there was no surprises there

[rhadam]

The reason libs dont want you to talk about this anymore is because they have to make fools of themselves to defend it

https://thenationalpulse.com/breakin...ul-vote-fraud/

WATCH: Rand Paul Destroys ABC’s Stephanopoulos Over ‘Voter Fraud Big Lie

In addition to Senate Paul slamming Stephanopoulos’s clear left-wing, anti-Trump bias several times, he also insisted that “the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur.”

“In my state, where we had a Democrat Secretary of State, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the rolls of illegal voters. We got a Republican Secretary of State and he purged the rolls. […] In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically, those were thrown out. This time they weren’t,” he explains.

Senator Paul adds to his compelling case of voter fraud that there is a possibility election-related lawsuits could “work their way up to the Supreme Court”:

There were several states in which the law was changed by the Secretary of State and not the state legislature. To me, those are clearly unconstitutional and I think there is still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court.

So I remember when (pre election) this was brought up (don't recall the outlet or specific time) and it struck me as odd. I don't specifically know how this area of state govt operates, so maybe it's not actually out of the ordinary for a secretary of state to change certain processes before an election? The timing seems appropriate given their duties. However, at the time something just felt.. off..

Virginia Courts, if I remember correctly, struck down one or multiple changes inserted by the Secretary of State.. I believe involving votes being allowed to be counted after the deadline for proving ID or something. I can understand changes to the system because of COVID, however changing plans/programs/processes in November when you've had months to think about this strikes me as both shady and moronic. Two attributes almost all elected officials exhibit.

[gtrzrus]

I have no doubt that in 15 to 20 years it will all come out after everyone involved is dead and buried. No one will care and we will have moved on to some other crisis.

I do suspect that there will be one or more ‘head shots’ taken in the next two or three years from individuals who can’t handle the fact that the election was rigged. Most can just accept the outcome as there is little that can be done by the average person, but peeps in basements don’t see the world like most.

[rtpmarine]

Signatures were not matched on absentee or mail-in ballots in all of the key states that Trump lost (WI, MI, PA, GA, AZ) — 0% rejection rates across the board.

There is no denying that rejection rates were way down across the board, and mail-in was way up because of COVID. Anyone who claims this election was clean is obviously carrying water or stupid, or both.

[oaktownabroad]

It was either 1) a huge conspiracy to steal the election and everyone involved (would have to be thousands across states) has managed to keep their mouths shut and also hide all the evidence OR 2) the majority of people in the USA realized Trump was a dumbass, just like his followers, and voted his fat ass out.

Option 2 is looking pretty good to me right now.

[Bodhy]

Signatures were not matched on absentee or mail-in ballots in all of the key states that Trump lost (WI, MI, PA, GA, AZ) — 0% rejection rates across the board.

There is no denying that rejection rates were way down across the board, and mail-in was way up because of COVID. Anyone who claimsj this election was clean is obviously carrying water or stupid, or both.

That's a bogus voting fraud claim that has already been fact checked and refuted. This was the basis of the Trump teams legal challenge in Georgia, and it was laughed out of court for being manifestly ridiculous.

What actually happened here was something entirely innocuous and routine being spun by the right wing media ecosystem into something nefarious sounding.

[TrueTruth]

This is the same sack of **** that drank milk and cookies with Biden during the 2nd debate. Look at how triggered he got. Partisan scumbag lib. Fuk him and fuk his leftist MSM propaganda

Good job Rand. Wish Rand would object to certifying the election though, for that reason I prefer Lion Ted

[oaktownabroad]

This is the same sack of **** that drank milk and cookies with Biden during the 2nd debate. Look at how triggered he got. Partisan scumbag lib. Fuk him and fuk his leftist MSM propaganda

Good job Rand. Wish Rand would object to certifying the election though, for that reason I prefer Lion Ted

Why do you hate democracy? Just because MAGA lost doesn't mean you get to make up fantasies about voter fraud and overturn elections. Don't get bitter....get better. The majority of America sees MAGA as a bunch of toothless idiots lead by a grifting fat ass. Get better politics and you'll win elections and won't need to cry afterwards.

[TrueTruth]

Why do you hate democracy? Just because MAGA lost doesn't mean you get to make up fantasies about voter fraud and overturn elections. Don't get bitter....get better. The majority of America sees MAGA as a bunch of toothless idiots lead by a grifting fat ass. Get better politics and you'll win elections and won't need to cry afterwards.

Go watch the video so Rand can ether both Stephanopoulos and your stupid ass, lib

[oaktownabroad]

Go watch the video so Rand can ether both Stephanopoulos and your stupid ass, lib

Good response, bro. Rand get his ass kicked again recently?

[TrueTruth]

Good response, bro. Rand get his ass kicked again recently?

No, but your partisan MSM slave master sure looked pissed that Klobuchar had mic problems and left him all alone without backup to get pushed around by Paul Jr.

[oaktownabroad]

No, but your partisan MSM slave master sure looked pissed that Klobuchar had mic problems and left him all alone without backup to get pushed around by Paul Jr.

Not believing the lie that the election was stolen doesn't make me partisan, it makes me intelligent. It's the people who believe it who are partisan dumbasses.

[wickedman]

There was massive voter fraud, but Trump deserved to lose. He should have seen it coming given just how demented the Russia hoax became. Dumb to stand by and not prepare for it.

[ezmac31]

That's a bogus voting fraud claim that has already been fact checked and refuted. This was the basis of the Trump teams legal challenge in Georgia, and it was laughed out of court for being manifestly ridiculous.

What actually happened here was something entirely innocuous and routine being spun by the right wing media ecosystem into something nefarious sounding.

Fact checking from liberal partisan garbage sources means nothing sorry

[Polaris]

Inb4 he gets assaulted by another unhinged lib.

[whogotmuhbeers]

That was awesome.

Paul 2024

[bluebeltATT]

Staffanapulous is a fking tool he's a left wing (D) cheerleader

[Stizzel]

There was massive voter fraud, but Trump deserved to lose. He should have seen it coming given just how demented the Russia hoax became. Dumb to stand by and not prepare for it.

I wouldnt say that he deserved to lose but he definitely dropped the ball

[Bodhy]

Fact checking from liberal partisan garbage sources means nothing sorry

You don't refute or counterpoint an argument or a factual presentation by simply calling something "partisan garbage".


Just because something disagrees with your view doesn't mean it's automatically wrong; nor does dropping the word partisan into your posts at random make oneself intelligent.

[Stizzel]

You don't refute or counterpoint an argument or a factual presentation by simply calling something "partisan garbage".


Just because something disagrees with your view doesn't mean it's automatically wrong; nor does dropping the word partisan into your posts at random make oneself intelligent.

You didnt source your fact check so you either know its garbage or you're just an idiot

[niospecv]

You can't reason with a low IQ libtard.

[ToPHeR35]

You can't reason with a low IQ libtard.

You forgot the Clinton part