No, I don't mean by means of exterminating all but 1 race, but creating 1 super hybrid. This would likely take 2-3 generations to achieve.
Example,
whites and blacks make kids
asians and middle easterners make kids, (aware both are asian)
20 years later the 2 muts make babies,
creating 1 Super Hybrid, and letting the pure races die.
Just though of this while taking a ****, would the earth be a better place? Completely free from racism?
discuss.
|
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 92
Thread: How would earth be with 1 race?
-
02-11-2009, 05:41 PM #1
How would earth be with 1 race?
Last edited by AboveAverage; 02-11-2009 at 05:44 PM.
-
02-11-2009, 05:42 PM #2
Given enough time this will inevitably happen anyways.
-
02-11-2009, 05:42 PM #3
inb4 skettch
inb4 massive race/immigration debate
-
02-11-2009, 05:43 PM #4shadowsfall19Guest
Technically we're already there.
F*ck the racialists...we're all human, therefore one race.
If anything, it'll take a while for different cultures to disappear.
This forum requires that you wait 45 seconds between posts. Please try again in 9 seconds.
-
-
02-11-2009, 05:44 PM #5
-
02-11-2009, 05:45 PM #6
-
02-11-2009, 05:46 PM #7Semper Fi
★★★ Jason Genova is gonna make it Crew ★★★
★★★FAITH in Humanity Restored Crew★★★
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=150516403
Misc Fire Team 2:
Johnnybomb;DonMegaR;NotMeAgain;armymuscle01;girlygirl;sickdevildog1;MIH-XTC;awds;Sable Strenua;The Big E
-
02-11-2009, 05:46 PM #8shadowsfall19Guest
-
-
02-11-2009, 05:47 PM #9
-
02-11-2009, 05:47 PM #10
there would be a mutation thatll create a stronger race and one will be in control and there would be constant civil war
-
02-11-2009, 05:48 PM #11
I've thought this too, OP. If we survive 2012 (lolwut) I see it happening within 500 years
one human race of beige
-
02-11-2009, 05:49 PM #12
-
-
02-11-2009, 05:52 PM #13
-
02-11-2009, 05:52 PM #14
it aint gonna make the world a happy place.
Look at history - there has always been hatred between people of the same race. Europeans fighting europeans, asians fighting asians, blacks fighting blacks...people would just find something else to argue over.
-
02-11-2009, 05:53 PM #15
we'll die from a super volcano before this happens...
-
02-11-2009, 05:54 PM #16shadowsfall19Guest
Uhh...no, brah, sorry. At least not according to modern science.
7. Ask students what their estimates indicate about the extent of human genetic variation at the molecular level.
Students should recognize that at the molecular level, humans are far more alike (about 99.9 percent of the bases are the same) than they are different (only about 0.1 percent of the bases are different). Students should also realize, however, that even a small percentage difference can represent a very large actual number of differences in something as large as the human genome.
If students have difficulty reaching these conclusions, help them by asking questions such as, "Based on this comparison, do you think that at the molecular level, people are more alike than they are different or vice versa?" and "How can a difference of only 0.1 percent (1 in 1,000) result in such a large number of differences (3 million differences)?"
8. Explain that the rest of the activity focuses on this 0.1 percent difference between people. Ask students questions such as, "Do you think these differences matter? What effect do you think they have? What might affect how much a specific difference matters?"
These questions focus students' attention on the significance of the differences, instead of the number of differences. Remind students of the differences among people that they observed in Activity 1 and point out that most of these differences have their basis in a difference in the DNA sequence of particular genes (probably pierced versus non pierced body parts do not). To help them understand the magnitude of the number of differences between their DNA and that of another person, ask students if they think there are 3 million differences in appearance and biological functions between themselves and the person sitting next to them.
In addition to that, the very fact that a woman from say, Jamaica, and a man from Italy can mate and have fertile children totally debunks that theory (it's called the "Biological Species Concept").
Sure, they try to say that wristbone fusions and skull shapes are enough to separate the "races", forgetting about the fact that these same things appear in many different groups without any sort of regularity or pattern.
We are all human. And I'm fine with that.
-
-
02-11-2009, 05:54 PM #17
-
02-11-2009, 05:55 PM #18
Call it what you want but there is a difference, not that it's a bad thing but there is obviously a difference between races.
It's not solely about skin tone. It also has everything to do with bone structure, some races are prone to certain diseases more than others, cranium capacity, hair type, eye shape, general facial construction and nose shape, size, type. If you look at albino blacks, you will see that skin tone is not the only thing that separates lets say, blacks from whites.
-
02-11-2009, 05:57 PM #19
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,420
- Rep Power: 13116
♂Nice Ass Crew♀
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
I rape back (if you ask me to :P)
-
02-11-2009, 05:57 PM #20
-
-
02-11-2009, 05:58 PM #21
-
02-11-2009, 05:58 PM #22
-
02-11-2009, 05:59 PM #23shadowsfall19Guest
Lol, that old chestnut.
Too bad this **** was debunked a long time ago:
Although the categorization of a skull is clearly given arbitrary parameters, it will not locate the owners geographic ancestry concretely all the time. While one's perception of an individual's race can be affected by cultural aspects, the "race" of his skull is less ambiguous. As Dr. Stan Rhine put it, "...it is clear that race does mean different things to different people. In the context of forensic anthropology, the term race is unambiguous."[6] Although their craniofacial race based on skull indices is unambiguous, it will not pin point their geographic origins accurately all the time due to variation in skulls within a geographic region.
While this method produces useful results for the population of the United States, it is likely that it would not be reliable for populations from other countries[7] or historical periods.[8] This is because the United States has traditionally had groups whose ancestries came from geographically distant locations, and which have generally remained endogamous in this country, for social reasons. As more immigrants from in between regions and as Americans become more racially mixed, such craniofacial identification is problematic.
Classification by craniofacial anthropometry does not necessarily coincide with genetic ancestry or social self-identification. For example, about one-third of so-called "White" Americans have detectable African DNA markers.[9] And about five percent of so-called "Black" Americans have no detectable "Negroid" traits at all, neither craniofacial nor in their DNA.[10] In short, given three Americans, one who self-identifies and is socially accepted as U.S. White, another one who self-identifies and is socially accepted as U.S. Black, and one who self-identifies and is socially accepted as U.S. Hispanic, and given that they have precisely the same Afro-European mix of ancestries (one "mulatto" grandparent), there is quite literally no objective test that will identify their U.S. endogamous group membership without an interview.[11] In practice, the application of such forensic criteria ultimately comes down to whether the skull "looks Negroid," "Caucasoid," or "Mongoloid" in the eye of each U.S. forensic practitioner.
Still though, what you posted completely ignores the fact that if two humans mated, regardless of how they looked, they still produce a human...and that human can go on to produce other humans.
Looking at someone and making conclusions about them just isn't enough.
You SAY that you're not a racialist, but you're using the same tired arguments that they use.
If it looks like a duck...
-
02-11-2009, 06:00 PM #24
-
-
02-11-2009, 06:01 PM #25
-
02-11-2009, 06:02 PM #26
-
02-11-2009, 06:02 PM #27
-
02-11-2009, 06:02 PM #28
-
-
02-11-2009, 06:03 PM #29
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 773
- Rep Power: 284
if it isn't race, its religion....if its not religion, its class (lower, middle, upper)....if its not class its where you came from (country)....there will always be discrimination and prejudice, sadly, i am beginning to be believe its human nature
-
02-11-2009, 06:04 PM #30
Bookmarks