The most infamous person in history had more charisma and was a better speaker to the masses than the majority of our politicians. how ironic and sad is tht? Not only that you can tell he really cared for his country despite how hateful and evil as he was in his ideologies. Shame America will never have leaders like this
|
-
11-25-2017, 01:09 PM #1
All jokes aside. Hitler was probably one of the greatest speakers in modern history.
-
11-25-2017, 01:21 PM #2
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 20,828
- Rep Power: 237598
Those that don't know history will probably be in here calling you a Trumplet or racist bigot or something but
Hitler was actually a good speaker, he rallied the entire country and was very strategic as far as the military goes. Basically, he was a pretty smart person- but he was purely evil. He probably could have done much more damage in WW2 if he didn't screw up in the early 40's by trying to take on Russia. If he let them sit there and wait to see if he had won Europe and then campaigned on them it could have been much different.
I believe he was also using some sort of drugs (a lot of German soldiers were using meth to give them an upper) and went kind of crazy with battle plans.
Like I said, pure evil though.USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
-
11-25-2017, 01:27 PM #3
No-one can reasonably deny that Hitler was a powerful and charismatic public speaker. He was an underground Army officer of some kind IIRC and his talent for speeches rapidly propelled him up and out of that role into full time demagogue.
I think that still falls short of implying we need more Hitlers for leaders though.
EDIT
Oh yeah and he loved his country so much that when he finally accepted that WWII was lost (because his colossal strategic blunders brought the Slavic hordes into Europe) that he wanted Germany to burn down to the ground with him. Fkn despicable narcissistic scumbag IMO."A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
-
11-25-2017, 01:32 PM #4
-
-
11-25-2017, 01:56 PM #5
-
11-25-2017, 02:01 PM #6
-
11-25-2017, 02:04 PM #7
-
11-25-2017, 02:06 PM #8
-
-
11-25-2017, 02:07 PM #9
Hitler was against the banking cartel just like the founding fathers of the United States were. After the first world war Germany was put into a debt it couldn't escape. Debt-based economies are ruinous and only benefit those orchestrating them. The founding fathers broke away from it, and so did Nazi Germany. This is why Germany went from collapsed economy after the first war (accompanied by debt) to the war machine that essentially took on all of Europe. They went against the world banking elite and started printing their own money;
“The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” -Abraham Lincoln
Our entire world economy is debt-based from the top down. The founding fathers were against it:
“… The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating.” -Thomas Jefferson
in the video OP posted, Hitler says this:
"Our people had to suffer immensely due to inflation"
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.
-
11-25-2017, 02:09 PM #10
-
11-25-2017, 02:10 PM #11
-
11-25-2017, 02:17 PM #12
-
-
11-25-2017, 02:34 PM #13
-
11-25-2017, 02:41 PM #14
You have to consider who he is speaking to and at what time. You have to consider who his audience is, the social context, and the dominant feelings of despair, humiliation, and rage. His speeches naturally attempted to mirror, replace, nourish, and dissipate these emotions when necessary. Soft words from a manufactured leader like Reagan would have failed utterly. Saying he just yells is also ridiculous, listen to an actual speech. He starts quietly (actually he starts by staring out and audience and appraising them for a minute), almost meekly and builds in intensity, all the while monitoring his audience's reactions, before delivering the crescendo.
-
11-25-2017, 02:42 PM #15
-
11-25-2017, 02:43 PM #16
-
-
11-25-2017, 02:47 PM #17
-
11-25-2017, 02:47 PM #18
-
11-25-2017, 03:06 PM #19
-
11-25-2017, 03:07 PM #20
-
-
11-25-2017, 03:10 PM #21
-
11-25-2017, 03:14 PM #22
-
11-25-2017, 03:17 PM #23Originally Posted by Dave22reborn
When possible though, they just stole everything they could find and called it a day."
http://www.businessinsider.com/6-thi...ng-wwii-2015-5
-
11-25-2017, 03:24 PM #24
They were still using horses for transports during their wars.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/arti...-Super-Science
-
-
11-25-2017, 03:25 PM #25
-
11-25-2017, 03:27 PM #26
-
11-25-2017, 03:28 PM #27
-
11-25-2017, 03:28 PM #28
-
-
11-25-2017, 03:32 PM #29
-
11-25-2017, 03:37 PM #30
Not exactly true. He was a strategic liability for the Axis war effort because of his insistence on commanding the military and making bad decisions. The Allies made a decision at some point to not focus on trying to kill him because they felt better military decisions might be made. Would have been pretty brutal if the Axis decided to withdraw in 1943 to expanded borders and fought defensively on a much smaller front, instead of being horribly overextended in the Soviet Union.
Yes. Not his inner circle though, I think Admiral Canaris was the highest ranked traitor. BTW the plots from army members lead Hitler to consolidate his grip over the Wehrmacht, to the detriment of the Axis as i mention above."A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
Bookmarks