Oh lawd...where to begin?
-It's funny that you bring up the teen section. The teen section is where I've been posting for close to a year now and although I caused a few ****storms here and there, I'd say the average TBB poster has about 20 IQ points on the average WP/Exercise section poster and that's being generous. For one, nobody there will ever pull the puberty card because they're either going through or have just gone through puberty and have the common sense to know that you don't gain 25+ lbs of muscle, 16" arms, and a proportionate physique in a year purely due to puberty, a caloric surplus, and lifting weights. On the other hand, everybody in this section likes to pull that card to explain their lack of results.
-You entered two powerlifting competitions? What does this prove if you don't look like you lift or even have an impressive total? I can enter 10 if you want me to, but I'll still look better than you at the end of the day.
-I never said that I gained 25 pounds of muscle in my first year. I gained over 25 pounds of muscle in my first year.
|
Thread: The Official K.O.H.T. V2 Thread
-
12-28-2012, 04:14 AM #151
Last edited by EricKanevskiy; 12-28-2012 at 04:21 AM.
-
12-28-2012, 04:20 AM #152
Sorry to say eric (not really) but you cant be serious, there are heaps of people over in tbb that are bigger than you (myself included), and you act as if 16' arms are big, if anyone gained as much fat as you have they'de have arms that big aswell, and stop being so arrogant, i looked better than you when i was 14
-
-
12-28-2012, 04:32 AM #153
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 39
- Posts: 4,673
- Rep Power: 11140
All this claiming about your results. Do you have a picture without a top on?
It'd be interesting to see how much muscle you've actually put on. It's difficult to tell as your AVI only shows your arms. Don't play the homo card either. I reckon you've put on more fat and gained less muscle than you might think. Over 25 pounds of muscle is alot.Powerlifter 160/100/195/455kg @ 91.55
137.5/97.5/195/430kg @ 82.7
Boxer 5-1
-
12-28-2012, 04:35 AM #154
-
12-28-2012, 04:35 AM #155
Well, this thread has gone to ****. From this point forward, I will only answer serious questions from people on the program/wanting to try the program out. Anybody who bickers about high volume or frequency or puberty or optimal or any of that other shyt will be ignored. If you don't like the program, don't do it. Simple as that. However, don't come back and complain to me when your results are sub optimal. I'll leave it at that. Time to get this thread back on track.
Tymen.Last edited by EricKanevskiy; 12-28-2012 at 04:41 AM.
-
12-28-2012, 04:37 AM #156
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Victoria, Australia
- Age: 31
- Posts: 3,595
- Rep Power: 995
I've never seen him squat.
Aren't you the one advocating that linear strength routines are better for beginners even if their main goal is hypertrophy? Most of those programs don't even remotely touch on MMC; simply physically performing the exercise properly.
I did Stronglifts and similar other routines for about 2-3 months and it was great for form; I learnt all the big lifts. It sure as hell didn't teach me a thing about MMC though which is crucial to effective hypertrophy training.
In the end, people "learn" these things from experience and they get to experience all KOHT has to offer 3 times a week, giving beginners plenty of opportunity to learn and adapt to what they're doing.
You're saying that's impossible/too difficult with so many exercises and limited sets per exercise right? I simply disagree.Workout Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=168292533&p=1378041213#post1378041213
---
☢☢☢☢ Tall Guy Crew ☢☢☢☢
☆☆☆MISC INK CREW☆☆☆
-
-
12-28-2012, 04:39 AM #157
-
12-28-2012, 04:41 AM #158
-
12-28-2012, 04:44 AM #159
-
12-28-2012, 04:47 AM #160
-
-
12-28-2012, 04:57 AM #161
-
12-28-2012, 04:58 AM #162
-
12-28-2012, 05:04 AM #163
-
12-28-2012, 05:05 AM #164
At risk of being accused of pulling the "puberty card", at his age, while still growing, such gains are not unheard of. That should be obvious. I know people who have gained close to 25lbs of muscle in a year who don't even lift, during a growth spurt.
i can confirm this, i have been regular poster in both sections for years.
lol you don't know eric do you?
He only posts pics with heavy lighting, angles etc
Because that's what's optimal
-
-
12-28-2012, 05:10 AM #165
-
12-28-2012, 05:15 AM #166
-
12-28-2012, 05:24 AM #167
-
12-28-2012, 05:32 AM #168
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150403
-
-
12-28-2012, 05:54 AM #169
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 39
- Posts: 4,673
- Rep Power: 11140
After having another look at the OP photos I have a feeling that Eric is in fact quite porky nowadays. If you start out as anorexic and you train and eat your way to podgyness, regardless of puberty or not, the transformation will be huge. I'm sure he has his nutrition in check. I just doubt that he knows much about the execution of lifts and what a good program is. I'm estimating he has doubled his Bodyfat % from the photos supplied. Nothing wrong with that, except he's acting like some kind of big shot when he's just fresh out of noob gains.
Powerlifter 160/100/195/455kg @ 91.55
137.5/97.5/195/430kg @ 82.7
Boxer 5-1
-
12-28-2012, 06:02 AM #170
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150403
Agreed. When I bulked to 196, I thought I was muscular. In fact, I overfeed incorrectly (wreck-less abandon) and put on quite a bit of fat. At 167, I probably have 10 more pounds to go.
The OP has a solid knowledge of nutrition. I just hope his execution with diet is better than his execution of movements.
-
12-28-2012, 06:10 AM #171
Will do.
You're doing the majority of the compound exercises for 6-8 sets per week with this routine, which is more than you would on Starting Strength, for example, so poor motor development isn't really a concern. It's just that on top of doing presses, rows, squats, etc. you're also not neglecting anything, hence the much higher volume.
If muscle protein synthesis is not elevated, your muscles are not growing so saying that there's no correlation is a bit of a stretch. Yes, progressive overload is far more important and somebody who progressively overloads on a bro split will gain more muscle than somebody who does my program and never adds weight to anything. However, in that case, they're not really doing my program after all. I explain the importance of progressive overload in the video and explain how to progress so it is not my fault if somebody chooses to ignore the program's ideologies.
Is progressive overload the most important factor when it comes to muscle growth? Yes. Will progressive overload + consistently elevated protein synthesis lead to more muscle growth than just progressive overload? Yes. In fact, there is a lot more room for progressive overload when you're performing exercises 3x a week rather than 1x or 2x so you're really just picking at straws with this argument.
-
12-28-2012, 06:38 AM #172
What is this, I don't even. You're basing my knowledge off of one set, which was a PR set to failure, where form was bound to degenerate. If you watch some of my other recent workout videos, my form is close to impeccable more often than not.
If you're going to pull the noob gains card, post a picture of your first year progress. If gaining 30 pounds of muscle and 5" on your arms in one year is considered normal, why hasn't a single person in this thread been able to replicate this kind of progress?
-
-
12-28-2012, 06:50 AM #173
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Victoria, Australia
- Age: 31
- Posts: 3,595
- Rep Power: 995
-
12-28-2012, 07:00 AM #174
- Join Date: Feb 2012
- Location: Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 39
- Posts: 4,673
- Rep Power: 11140
Maybe your form is good in the others. You should have posted one of those instead. I have a vid of me squatting a tough 300x5 and every rep reaches depth so I don't think it's any excuse.
It's impossible to compare your progress with mine. I was a fully grown man when I started at around 15% bf. You were a boy hitting puberty (you clearly have no idea how much testosterone that gives you) and were tiny at considerably less than 10%bf. You had all the time in the world to train and sleep as you've got no commitments. My weight gain ceiling was less than yours' plus I work a demanding job, often 7 days a week. If I had your time, I could have made better progress, but I've done pretty well I'd say.
And so have you. Just calm the attitude and be a little humble. You do not, and cannot, know the most optimal program with such little experience. It's worth looking into, this style of programming, but I think you're going overboard with the effectiveness especially as you haven't trained any successful natty BBers.Powerlifter 160/100/195/455kg @ 91.55
137.5/97.5/195/430kg @ 82.7
Boxer 5-1
-
12-28-2012, 07:01 AM #175
-
12-28-2012, 07:02 AM #176
I've been lifting for halv a year, I am a beginner and I have learned mucch, and yet I don't have as much as most people on the forums know.
Nevertheless, i can't helpng wondring how much sterooids you have used to gain that much muscle. I am a newbie, but you got ALOT of volume and you exercise often. Anyone else thinking the same?
-
-
12-28-2012, 07:43 AM #177
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: New Hampshire, United States
- Age: 47
- Posts: 16,398
- Rep Power: 150403
Bad form involves butt winking, goodmorning, knee caving etc. What we have here with you, is a failure to go into the hole. Your form isn't failing, you are refusing to do a full ROM. Big difference IMO.
If you're going to pull the noob gains card, post a picture of your first year progress. If gaining 30 pounds of muscle and 5" on your arms in one year is considered normal, why hasn't a single person in this thread been able to replicate this kind of progress?
152 lbs
I bulked up to about 190+ish and cut.
172 lbs (after cut @ one year in training)
I consider my first year to be a good one, though not stellar. I think you are in for a rude awakening when you find you have to cut 30 pounds.
LOL @ your hommie.
Gotcha on recharge Brad.
Of course there is this. I am well past my hormonal prime, I work 3rd shift and have a number of other responsibilities a child does not. Yet I still progressed well.Last edited by acrawlingchaos; 12-28-2012 at 08:06 AM.
-
12-28-2012, 08:40 AM #178
Correct me if I'm wrong but this program is designed for hypertrophy. Therefore, I'm shaking my head at the people claiming size and power lifting experience equates to expertise in nutritional and physiological sciences. If size and strength were the best mediums for determining a person's knowledge base by that means the olympians must be smarter than guys like Alan, Lyle, Layne, and a number of other reputable people in the field. Additionally, I don't believe Lyle McDonald had any credentials before contributing to the field and did not study anything to do with exercise science at a higher learning institution; but is currently one of the most reputable contributors. I've seen Eric's videos and they've got good information in them. However, the point is he has videos lol the majority of the critics here ragging hard haven't done anything to input their opinion to the field.
-
12-28-2012, 09:12 AM #179
-
12-28-2012, 09:12 AM #180
You use extremes to make your point. Obviously, an elite athlete will not know more than someone who earns his life with researches and vulgarization. However, the guy who has quite a lot of experience and made good progress is more likely to know more than the kid who just finished his puberty and has been lifting for a year.
lol @ eric's vids got good infos. Anyone on this forum could do the same. He is just parroting informations from stickies. When he is trying to vulgarize informations from articles, he ends up spitting bull**** because he dont understand the content.☆ ☆ QUEBEC CREW ☆ ☆
OW log :
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=149575693&p=977696913#post977696913
Competition lift : 212 kg total (95/117) @ 77 kg
Bookmarks