Trump campaign in disarray - end may be near. Manafort has given up

[Noliberals4]

I saw what you posted.

Hard to negotiate with a bitter and terminal old man.

That is Trump. Yes, he is a bitter old man.

Plus, if it was such a problem, why did he not significantly increase the amount of Republicans in the Senate and keep the House?

Was losing the House a part of his plan?

See, while you blame others as an EXCUSE, I look at the reality of it all and people don't like to hear the truth. They lash out, they deny it. And the truth of the matter is, Trump's Presidency has been a bigger flop than New Coke, the Justice League movie, and Windows 8 and you know it.

Do you see what I am saying now?

[deepfat]

That is Trump. Yes, he is a bitter old man.

Plus, if it was such a problem, why did he not significantly increase the amount of Republicans in the Senate and keep the House?

Was losing the House a part of his plan?

See, while you blame others as an EXCUSE, I look at the reality of it all and people don't like to hear the truth. They lash out, they deny it. And the truth of the matter is, Trump's Presidency has been a bigger flop than New Coke, the Justice League movie, and Windows 8 and you know it.

Do you see what I am saying now?

Jesus dude, losing the House has happened to virtually all first term presidents. There's a net gain in the Senate. Need we bring up Obama's first midterm numbers again?

[Stizzel]

Jesus dude, losing the House has happened to virtually all first term presidents. There's a net gain in the Senate. Need we bring up Obama's first midterm numbers again?

Who cares bro. Hillary won

[Noliberals4]

Jesus dude, losing the House has happened to virtually all first term presidents. There's a net gain in the Senate. Need we bring up Obama's first midterm numbers again?

He could have saved the House if he actually did what he promised to do.

And the last midterm had incredible turnout - so high, the 2018 midterm actually had higher turnout than the 1996 election and was only half a point from 1988 election turnout.

I mean Trump's agenda was already dead, but did it have to be? Why do you blame others when the guy you're defending literally said him being a master negotiator was THE selling point?

Trump literally had a book called "The Art of the Deal." Trump during his first speech bragged about how he got along with everybody and how because he sold apartments to Chinese people, it was proof he could negotiate with anyone.

The problem is you're applying RINO cuck rules to Trump and I am not. Funny enough, that means YOU see Trump as a RINO cuck and not me which is absolutely HILARIOUS.

[recedingjaw]

He could have saved the House if he actually did what he promised to do.

Nah, democrat turnout was just extremely high this time around. When democrats turn out, republicans are fuked. Republicans are happy overall with Trump if you look at polling averages among republicans.

No rational person believes Trump could have gotten everything done on his agenda in 2 years

[Noliberals4]

Nah, democrat turnout was just extremely high this time around. When democrats turn out, republicans are fuked. Republicans are happy overall with Trump if you look at polling averages among republicans.

No rational person believes Trump could have gotten everything done on his agenda in 2 years

I disagree with you here - maybe you're right, but the losses could have been minimal. A LOT of Republicans in the House lost only by a couple points. If Trump could have kept the Dems under 225, the House could have been in play in 2020 again.

Even ignoring his agenda, he has a huge problem with communication and messaging. How hard is it to point out the problems with illegal immigration for example? It's easy as hell. Most Americans don't care one iota about the MS-13, but he's obsessed with them for some reason. How hard is it to point out illegals use stolen or fake SSNs? Or that 95%+ of illegals DON'T work in the fields like so many people believe? Or how illegals get in-state tuition in 20+ states?

When I point out the last part to super liberals, even THEY get annoyed by it because they can relate to it. No one can relate to the MS-13 lmao. But (most) every American can relate to tuition.

Another good example of this is the "family separation" bullcrap. Liberals and the media WERE LITERALLY HANDING HIM AMMO ON A SILVER PLATTER. Time Magazine outright admitted they lied about one of their covers with the girl crying. The entire "controversy" started with them showing pictures from 2014 and blaming them on Trump. And what does Trump do?

He signs an executive order HOURS after the faux controversy hit!!!! That was so infuriating. He gave them everything over some lies and they STILL ripped him apart for it.

And then you have Kavanaugh. While it was cool to see Trump defend him over Ford, Trump should have ripped apart Democrats as well. Show how Democrats defended people like Harvey Weinstein, Al Franken, Eric Schneidermann, Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner, etc. etc. DESTROY them over that. Instead they let the Democrats totally control public opinion on #MeToo.

So even if you ignore his agenda, his messaging and communication also get a big fat F.

[JUSA]

Who cares bro. Hillary won

This.

Why would anyone engage in debate with someone utterly dishonest and just as unhinged. Ignore trolls, deepfat.

[BS57]

Holy crap! I heard Trump got kicked-out, and Hill is packing to head for the WH.