It's a good thing we don't have any exports to Mexico that will be impacted by the retaliatory 20% tax.
|
-
01-26-2017, 02:34 PM #91
-
01-26-2017, 02:49 PM #92
-
-
01-26-2017, 02:54 PM #93
I almost think they wanted this to happen cause they knew Mexican prez had no choice politically to cancel meeting or he looks weak. His approval rating is at an all time low since meeting with trump in September
So trump is prob like let's tweet some chit so he cancels meeting than use that as an excuse to put a tarrif to pay for wall. That's called being a ruthless businessman, but we benefit.
That's a 13D intergalactic chess move right there.Last edited by ArtistBrahs; 01-26-2017 at 03:04 PM.
Permaban bets with:
BadMonkeyFunker
Bohdy
Kane_89
-
01-26-2017, 02:55 PM #94
-
01-26-2017, 02:59 PM #95
-
01-26-2017, 03:11 PM #96
Avocados
mangos
pomegranates
watermelon (depending on where you live)
bananas
Xbox consoles
the majority of parts and accessories related to VW/Audi
Depends on the state. here in new mexico most of our fruit comes from Mexico.
fruits like avocado and bananas spoil too fast to come from California....and they are dirt cheap almost year round.
-
-
01-26-2017, 03:20 PM #97
- Join Date: Jul 2014
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 1,917
- Rep Power: 10763
Spicer may have spoke out of turn on this, but he didn't pull the tariff thing out of thin air. Trump's been talking about it from day one. Tariffs have always been part of his big plan. But it's a gradual process, and levying a tax that big out of the gate would be bad for everyone, just less so for the U.S. Nieto was testing him when he pulled out of the meeting. Trump (through proxy) responded by smacking him in the face with this 20% tax thing. Read the Art of the Deal. This is only the beginning. In the end, they're paying for the wall.
"Death is but a door, time is but a window. I'll be back." - Vigo the Carpathian
"We're all human sometimes." - Joshua the vendor (1/19/2017)
*Horsehead crew*
-
01-26-2017, 03:23 PM #98
-
01-26-2017, 03:24 PM #99
Neutral economics based opinion - Mexico will pay some, consumers will pay some. Mexico will be forced to lower the price of exports to the maximum we'll pay for it, where this maximum is extremely high for agriculture, and lower in other things, like cars and other manufactured goods.
Given that the main export is agriculture, and even a 20% price increase on Mexican agriculture will not come close to the cost of doing it in the US, the main people that will be paying for it is the consumers.
Also, trade is fluid, in the case where their exports are totally blocked, they won't sit there and try to sell to US, they'll sell to the next most eager buyer, be it Canada or China.
A lot of this is populism. If they were serious about bringing the competitive edge back to US, they would stop the offshoring of services, ie. Engineering, Accounting, Call centers, etc. where just a small tariff would give us a massive edge.
The tariff would need to be something like 300% for it to be cheaper to produce in US, rather than buy from Mexico, but I'm not sure I want to pay $100 for a bag of potatoes
-
01-26-2017, 03:25 PM #100
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Location: Plano, Texas, United States
- Posts: 6,199
- Rep Power: 94412
It may hit Mexico hard. It may not. Time will tell.
Now, let's assume Mex will be hit hard. One of the reason Mexicans try to get into the US is to escape their economy* and hope for a better life. So if Mexico's economy and standards of living increase, illegals crossing the border will decrease. In other words, one of ways to reduce illegals crossing into the US is to help Mexico and its people to prosper. The 20% tax does the opposite. It will lead to more Mexicans entering the US illegally .
-
-
01-26-2017, 03:25 PM #101
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/u...=fb-share&_r=0
You haven't seen the basis for his voter fraud investigation yet?
-
01-26-2017, 03:27 PM #102
-
01-26-2017, 03:31 PM #103
This is one of the most alpha political power plays I've ever seen.
EDIT: And lol at everyone scared of China. They're posturing because the elites over there know that even a month without the USA will result in an economic meltdown and probably an uprising. If Russia and the USA are allies then China will be ****ting their pants every day for the next eight years.Die Antwoord is GOAT crew
Anti-leftie/ communist/ peasant crew
Founder of the Foreigners for Trump crew
-
01-26-2017, 03:39 PM #104
-
-
01-26-2017, 03:40 PM #105
-
01-26-2017, 03:45 PM #106
-
01-26-2017, 03:46 PM #107
-
01-26-2017, 03:47 PM #108
-
-
01-26-2017, 03:49 PM #109
-
01-26-2017, 03:50 PM #110
-
01-26-2017, 03:53 PM #111
Good Lord, this guy is a savage. He reacts so quickly and brutally. He doesn't bluff.
Calm down ya cucks, if prices on Mexican stuff will go up other countries will jump in with their goods. Mexico isn't the only country that makes avocados and rapists.
Also, I propose invading Mexico. And take their oil. And women. Only the 8/10s and above thou. It's so important. It's like guaranteed, ok? 100%
-
01-26-2017, 03:55 PM #112
-
-
01-26-2017, 04:00 PM #113
Yes, plus all those infrastructure, skills and abilities left all those years ago too. Wages were much lower then too, and people bought less chit.
https://theawl.com/how-much-more-do-...243#.ol6n47bep
Higher wages + new infrastructure + time to acquire skills = possibly $10k for a television set. No thanks fam.
-
01-26-2017, 04:04 PM #114
-
01-26-2017, 04:08 PM #115
-
01-26-2017, 04:10 PM #116
-
-
01-26-2017, 04:13 PM #117
-
01-26-2017, 04:14 PM #118
-
01-26-2017, 04:14 PM #119
-
01-26-2017, 04:15 PM #120
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 4,668
- Rep Power: 31627
I laugh at all the "winning" responses. The tariffs haven't happened yet in the first place. If they do happen, we will still have to wait and see how it plays out to know if it was the right or wrong move. It's like claiming "winning" in a game that's 0-0 and all that's happened so far is some smack talk at the coin toss.
Bookmarks