|
-
03-29-2012, 03:15 PM #61
-
03-29-2012, 03:15 PM #62
-
03-29-2012, 03:21 PM #63
-
03-29-2012, 03:23 PM #64
-
-
03-29-2012, 03:23 PM #65
-
03-29-2012, 03:24 PM #66
-
03-29-2012, 03:26 PM #67
-
03-29-2012, 03:29 PM #68
Non aesthetic checking in here.
I am cutting but not at the expense of strength.
It'd defeat the purpose of lifting for me if I were to lose strength just to cut.You'll have to speak up, I'm wearing a towel.
[IIFYM/Flexible Dieting Crew] - It ain't that hard dummy..
[Former 300+ Crew]
*** Fitness Advice, Tech Reviews and more: https://www.youtube.com/user/mattypaus?feature=guide
-
-
03-29-2012, 03:30 PM #69
-
03-29-2012, 03:32 PM #70
-
03-29-2012, 03:32 PM #71
-
03-29-2012, 03:32 PM #72
-
-
03-29-2012, 03:35 PM #73
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 12,347
- Rep Power: 41963
Reality is that most in this forum are weak *******s compared to the PL section(myself included).
And you assume people consider themselves 'aesthetic'. Personally, I always, always, always wanna be bigger and leaner. And I thought this thread was just about training for PRs and not actually aesthetics?
Btw, I am just discussing, because I'm bored and not butthurt(aside from a tight piriformis)
-
03-29-2012, 03:35 PM #74
-
03-29-2012, 03:38 PM #75
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Sarasota, Florida, United States
- Posts: 24,829
- Rep Power: 80661
-
03-29-2012, 03:40 PM #76
-
-
03-29-2012, 03:47 PM #77
-
03-29-2012, 03:47 PM #78
-
03-29-2012, 03:50 PM #79
-
03-29-2012, 04:19 PM #80
-
-
03-29-2012, 04:20 PM #81
-
03-29-2012, 04:29 PM #82
-
03-29-2012, 05:05 PM #83
-
03-29-2012, 05:07 PM #84
-
-
03-29-2012, 06:25 PM #85
In on this krew. Definitely more interested in strength - if aesthetics occur or not I don't really care about this one.
Basically my goal right now too. I think if I fix my bench the 1000 is well within my grasp this year, and I doubt I'll pass 204 for a while (though I don't really care... But I'm still a recovering fatty lol)
Edit: and I'm definitely one of the mini plers... Same goals, (less than?) half the strength lol.Last edited by SoulZeppelin; 03-29-2012 at 06:35 PM.
Clear eyes, full heart: can't lose.
Log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=142413581
"So get off your keyboard because there is an empty squat rack somewhere that commands your attention." -Blaine Sumner
-
03-29-2012, 06:29 PM #86
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Posts: 9,824
- Rep Power: 31461
Nah, from the title of the thread I assumed it was more of a "70s big" sort of meaning. So being lean (within reasonable limits) doesn't really factor into the equation. >> http://www.70sbig.com/about/
70’s Big is synonymous with being strong. It can also be considered the quest of attaining strength and subsequently muscular body weight. The best way to obtain strength is through barbell training, and barbell training means squatting, pressing, deadlifting, cleaning, jerking, and snatching. Period.
There are plenty of people who make it a priority to look like they are strong when they actually aren’t. This would be training for the sake of aesthetics, and the type of training that meets such goals has no part in a strength program. The difference between a physique that has been developed through strength training is very different than one that has been created with vanity in mind.
-
03-29-2012, 06:44 PM #87
-
03-29-2012, 06:47 PM #8870’s Big is synonymous with being strong. It can also be considered the quest of attaining strength and subsequently muscular body weight. The best way to obtain strength is through barbell training, and barbell training means squatting, pressing, deadlifting, cleaning, jerking, and snatching. Period.
There are plenty of people who make it a priority to look like they are strong when they actually aren’t. This would be training for the sake of aesthetics, and the type of training that meets such goals has no part in a strength program. The difference between a physique that has been developed through strength training is very different than one that has been created with vanity in mind.
-
-
03-29-2012, 07:02 PM #89
Thus, the mission statement of 70’s Big is multi-faceted and ever evolving. We aim to:
•
Improve strength through barbell training while eating adequate amounts of food
•
Become big by being strong as opposed to aesthetic focused exercise
•
Begin a movement against the prevailing wisdom that “looking good” means being emaciated, gaunt, and undernourished (male or female)
•
Be humble about our own gains of strength while encouraging and teaching others to improve theirs
•
Honor the lifters of the past who inspire us to become 70’s Big
•Test ourselves in competition while encouraging others to take the chance on competing
•Teach fundamentals of strength and conditioning and help athletes or non-athletes implement it into their training
•Help push the campaign that strength training makes women healthy and beautiful
•Establish the importance of strength training in an exercise, health, or fitness programIt's your physique; train as YOU see fit.
UPPER/LOWER
-
03-29-2012, 07:19 PM #90
Bookmarks