|
View Poll Results: Romney or Obama?
- Voters
- 565. You may not vote on this poll
-
Romney
265 46.90% -
Obama
300 53.10%
Thread: Romney or Obama
-
08-07-2012, 06:04 PM #31
-
08-07-2012, 06:05 PM #32
-
-
08-07-2012, 06:05 PM #33
-
08-07-2012, 06:21 PM #34
Someone is seriously considering not voting for someone because of offshore bank accounts? You actually think a guy (Romney) who has been running for president for close to a decade hasn't paid his taxes? You wonder about offshore bank accounts but don't wonder about Obama's college transcripts? Neither issue is all that important. Romney has offshore accounts, he's worth 100's of millions of dollars. Obama, graduated from college, but obviously has stuff in his records he can't allow to be public. Every candidate has released their college transcripts. It is basically the same argument and unimportant.
Vote for something real. Jobs, debt, world affairs. Worrying about offshore accounts, college transcripts, birth certificates etc.. is stupid.
The decision comes down to this, do you think we've been doing all the things necessary to move the country in the right direct or not. If you think the country is heading in the right direction, vote Obama. If you don't vote for the other guy.
-
08-07-2012, 06:23 PM #35
-
08-07-2012, 06:23 PM #36
-
-
08-07-2012, 06:31 PM #37
-
08-07-2012, 06:35 PM #38
-
08-07-2012, 06:40 PM #39
... Kinda like Reagan?
• In 1986, Reagan supported an immigration reform that gave amnesty to 3 million illegal aliens. During the 1984 election, Reagan said, “I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and who have lived here even though sometime back they may have entered illegally.”
As long as you keep voting right vs. left nothing will change.
-
08-07-2012, 06:44 PM #40
-
-
08-07-2012, 06:44 PM #41
-
08-07-2012, 06:47 PM #42
-
08-07-2012, 06:47 PM #43
-
08-07-2012, 06:57 PM #44
would rather vote for Obama then Romney, don't need Romney starting to start another war with Iran. Obama isn't the best leader but Romney is one those *******s who would just try and use the military to get his way with other countries. I would accept another 4 years of Obama and no Major war, instead of a chicken-hawk like Romney when it was his turn to serve he become a Mormon missionary and went to France.
-
-
08-07-2012, 06:57 PM #45
-
08-07-2012, 06:59 PM #46
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 31
- Posts: 773
- Rep Power: 416
Considering Ron Paul won't be on the ballot, I will be voting for Gary Johnson who will be on the ballot in all 50 states, he is by far the best choice out of Romney or Obama
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
★ ☆ ★ RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012 ★ ☆ ★
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
***Misc Firefighter/EMT Crew***
ACSM CPT
***5/3/1 Crew*** Aesthetics Through Strength
-
08-07-2012, 07:00 PM #47
-
08-07-2012, 07:04 PM #48
-
-
08-07-2012, 07:13 PM #49
-
08-07-2012, 07:14 PM #50
-
08-07-2012, 07:33 PM #51
No Ron Paul, no care.
And seriously you people saying Gary Johnson need to reconsider. Yes he is mostly libertarian, but is he 100% behind what he says he is, like Ron Paul? See the below videos for more information.* Ron Paul has the best record of any politician in Congress. I would wager that he was the one that reintroduced you to the ideas of freedom and limited government at a time when it wasn't popular.
I'll never get another chance to vote for a Ron Paul again. That man has earned my vote.
*
http://youtu.be/uTihklVR52M?t=34s
http://youtu.be/0Y1egV2Q2FEI like eating but girls like abs. Lol @ life.
-
08-07-2012, 07:56 PM #52
-
-
08-07-2012, 07:58 PM #53
-
08-07-2012, 08:28 PM #54
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 462
- Rep Power: 220
Ron Paul won't be on the ballot, Gary Johnson will.
Edit- I watched the videos, okay he probably isn't the most legit libertarian party leader but it isn't like he has a chance at winning regardless. A vote for Gary Johnson is just a step towards a three party system; if the Libertarian party can hit the magical 1% it will only continue to gain momentum in the following elections. They will have a different leader by the time they ever have a chance at winning.Last edited by GamerMisc; 08-07-2012 at 08:33 PM.
Official Misc Lurker Crew.
-
08-07-2012, 09:13 PM #55
Seeing as you're voting Libertarian not to support Johnson (who is arguably not the best face for the party) but rather to vote against the 2 party system and increase LP awareness, I understand. A viable third party will wake up more people. Unfortunately unless they get a larger percentage, it won't matter. The media won't report on them. The media is still ignoring Ron Paul's candidacy and the crimes that are currently occurring in Maine, and he gets a hell of a lot more than 1%.
Nevertheless reps for you. I am writing Ron Paul in but others can do as they wish. Ballot or no ballot, he represents closest what I want out of government.I like eating but girls like abs. Lol @ life.
-
08-07-2012, 09:24 PM #56
Both are not good choices.
-Romney criticizes Obama for a very similar HC plan he set up in Mass.
-Obama restructred the military and cut spending which is good in times like these.
-Romney seems more sketchy and like he is gonna support wall street croneys.
I consider myself Conservative but i cant think of any BIG issues, other than immigration that would compell me to vote for Romney.
4 more years of Obama > 8 of Romney, and that is why i will most likely vote obama..if i do vote..n4l
Rayaarito
fappin
r32gojirra
-
-
08-07-2012, 09:28 PM #57
-
08-07-2012, 09:30 PM #58-SSgt A
"Marines I see as two breeds, Rottweilers or Dobermans, because Marines come in two varieties, big and mean, or skinny and mean. They're aggressive on the attack and tenacious on defense. They've got really short hair and they always go for the throat."
RAdm. "Jay" R. Stark, USN; 10 November 1995
-
08-07-2012, 09:30 PM #59
-
08-07-2012, 09:31 PM #60
Bookmarks