|
Closed Thread
Results 4,201 to 4,230 of 9161
-
01-22-2015, 08:27 PM #4201Power Engineer Crew
Tradie Life
-
01-22-2015, 09:05 PM #4202"I bet your parents taught you that you mean something, that you're here for a reason. My parents taught me a different lesson, dying in the gutter for no reason at all... They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to."
-
01-22-2015, 09:37 PM #4203
When UK downturn starts pepper thy angus.
When that happens bonuses (Especially Traders and Bankers) go down hard, layoffs, management changes, people can't afford the high rents and mortgage repayments - foreclosure everywhere. Price goes down - Property Developers cry Uncle etc.
All the domestic UHNW people either sell (if they were from UK since they can't afford to pay anymore) and downsize or hold and sell other foreign properties. The Foreign ones don't care, they come and buy since it's for security anyways. Only problem - are there any left apart from China? I highly doubt the Russians will buy up (since most already have a place). And if the UKIP wins then forget that they probs won't even be allowed into the country in the first place.
Saudi's already bought up, Russia's already there, USA I dunno about the habits of the UHNW there so it's essentially China that could possibly buy in a downturn. And The Bishops Avenue from some searching has a lot of rotting mansions so they'd have to factor rebuilding the damn thing and waiting a few years before they can even move in - if the Chinese crackdown gets more tough they might not have the time and just want a place ASAP so high-end luxury properties might not be their preference in that case (rather a place ready to move in, pay cash and leggo).
This pushes down the average price for properties hard!アンテナ称賛のオンデマンドの推奨
*Space Patrol Luluco is a 10/10 anime crew*
*Only person aware of Space Patrol Luluco crew*
*Fate/Hollow Ataraxia VN is a 20/10*
use dat dere https://archive.org/web/ and https://archive.is for potential GOAT threads to save them.
swoleyo - "All girls are gold diggers brah. Don't kid your self."
leoslayer1 - "Women are the same everywhere. Doesn't matter the country, continent or even hemisphere."
-
01-23-2015, 04:27 AM #4204
The one time I don't play SBUX earnings it rocks....go freakin figure.
-
-
01-23-2015, 04:53 AM #4205
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: A Town BODY POINTS 11205, Antarctica
- Posts: 6,140
- Rep Power: 16871
Sig line can't be a novel
THANKS FOR READING
20 IS 20. ATLEAST POST IN THE THREAD.
THANKS FOR READING
KNEE DRAGGER - HTC
THANKS FOR READING
THANKS FOR READING
Sig line can't be a novel
-
01-23-2015, 06:47 AM #4206
-
01-23-2015, 06:53 AM #4207
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: A Town BODY POINTS 11205, Antarctica
- Posts: 6,140
- Rep Power: 16871
holy boat load array
Sig line can't be a novel
THANKS FOR READING
20 IS 20. ATLEAST POST IN THE THREAD.
THANKS FOR READING
KNEE DRAGGER - HTC
THANKS FOR READING
THANKS FOR READING
Sig line can't be a novel
-
01-23-2015, 08:11 AM #4208
Bought another 25% of my oil etf. My stock is up right now so im gonna wait on that. Now 50% in my etf and 25% in stock.
Need opinions guys. Stock is FSU sector is Uranium mining. Mh friend put me on this stock. She said alot of people have been buying this....one of her clients put his down payment on this. They r exploration and found their mine has much more reserves than they thought and could be bought by a big guy.
Every time someone gives me a tip and I dont do anything...I miss out. Recently...Probe Mines which is gold explorer in Ontario was on a steady climb since my source was telling me about it and it was bought last week buy a big guy.
Any of u Canada brah's look into this. I wanna fuggin jewgif.jpgShhh, don't fight it.
-
-
01-23-2015, 08:12 AM #4209
It wont be. Egypt might get a little less money from Saudi in the March summit but the other Gulf states will make up for it.
Ultimately the death of the King does not change Saudi's geopolitical interests. It still hates Iran. It still hates the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islam. And it still desperately wants to see the success of the Sisi administration (as does Israel, the US, and the EU despite what they might tell you otherwise).Gary Johnson
2013 Investing Returns: 43.1%
Stock Positions:
NASDAQ: AAPL
TSE: TGL
-
01-23-2015, 08:26 AM #4210
someone hold me back from buying..."I bet your parents taught you that you mean something, that you're here for a reason. My parents taught me a different lesson, dying in the gutter for no reason at all... They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to."
-
01-23-2015, 08:35 AM #4211
alll aboarrdddddd
chochooooooo
next stop all time highs
"I bet your parents taught you that you mean something, that you're here for a reason. My parents taught me a different lesson, dying in the gutter for no reason at all... They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to."
-
01-23-2015, 08:36 AM #4212
-
-
01-23-2015, 08:48 AM #4213
hmmmm seems like a pretty ****ty deal lol
Also they have lost a lot of their retail clients (like me ), also oanda and forex.com have been aggressive in their "we got you back bro ad campaign". Since they reset their clients balance that went in the negative.
I just wanted to buy it because it was cheap , but its cheap for a reason
Although I have not doubt short term traders are loading up for a bounce"I bet your parents taught you that you mean something, that you're here for a reason. My parents taught me a different lesson, dying in the gutter for no reason at all... They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to."
-
01-23-2015, 08:51 AM #4214
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 7,069
- Rep Power: 156245
When putting together a DCF how do you project capex when you have no clue what their investing activities will be in the near future? Do you take a weighted average of their historicals or go about it another way?
-
01-23-2015, 08:53 AM #4215
-
01-23-2015, 09:10 AM #4216
-
-
01-23-2015, 09:26 AM #4217
-
01-23-2015, 10:29 AM #4218
-
01-23-2015, 10:34 AM #4219
youre friend is very smart...uranium has great fundamentals and the spot price rose last year. spot price s well below price of production, so either the price rises substantially or the lights go out.
FCU is a great play, they have a large resource in a prime location and are very undervalued they either go into production or get bought out. I also like denison mines. basically any explorer/miner with a good balance sheet, nice large economic resource, and lots of growth ahead.
-
01-23-2015, 10:36 AM #4220
does anyone here actually make consistence gains?
My problem is i lose money for every 2 days of gains. 2:1 gain lose days
-
-
01-23-2015, 10:47 AM #4221
-
01-23-2015, 10:49 AM #4222
-
01-23-2015, 10:55 AM #4223
housing has gotten much weaker in the past 12 months just check the data and that is with FALLING MORTGAGE RATES THE 10 AND 30 YEAR T BILLS ARE AT RECORD LOWS. the FHA has now introduced 3% down loans bc ppl are still too poor to buy. when you put so little down, youre much more likely to default when the market turns. if the fed raises rates, housing will decline at a much faster pace.
when housing had a run in 2012/2013, 85% or so of residential real estate was bought by cash buyers (speculators) hedge funds etc, it wasnt real home buyers, it was all due to qe3. home ownership rates in america have been steadily declining and are at 20 year lows. this is the trend. these record low bond yields will have to rise eventually which means a further drop in house prices.
THAT BEING SAID...if you are planning to buy a home to live in longterm, not speculating for a quick flip, then fine locking in a 30 year mortgage at 3.5% is not a bad idea instead of renting somewhere. its a great way to short the dollar ( warren buffet agrees ) those kinds of mortgages are great for the debtor but not the lender.Last edited by jackedguy87; 01-23-2015 at 11:00 AM.
-
01-23-2015, 10:55 AM #4224
yes
You have to be able to let go of a set up that fails asap
just cut if off and shake it off. I don't mind taking my losses, never bothers me honestly. But the losses you hold on to, are the ones that will ruin you. You will be able to get away with it a few times, I know I did but it will come back to bite you in the ass.
Its like holding a bad hand in poker, just fold and wait your a good one.
Then when you have a good set up, add up and let it run. This is crucial as it well make up for your losers.
Just like in poker when you have pocket aa's you re-raise that coksucka next to you"I bet your parents taught you that you mean something, that you're here for a reason. My parents taught me a different lesson, dying in the gutter for no reason at all... They taught me the world only makes sense if you force it to."
-
-
01-23-2015, 11:35 AM #4225
-
01-23-2015, 11:43 AM #4226
OCIR +0.0%
AET +3.2%
AXL +1.2%
Mean = +1.5% (+2.3% if you include HNT)
SPY = +2.2%
HNT +4.7% not counted in the mean
So I didn't beat SPY this week but I won't turn my nose up at 1.5%
I'll adjust for a true YTD on SPY in my sig. At the present time I was just going by a direct time in market comparison but I can see that causing confusion later.Last edited by Barn01; 01-23-2015 at 02:50 PM.
My $0.02 is worth $0.03
-
01-23-2015, 02:13 PM #4227
-
01-23-2015, 02:38 PM #4228
Try to find a really "normal" year that sticks out in the company's historical financials. Try to find a no-growth year and see what CapEx was like. Use that year's CapEx/EBITDA to forecast future CapEx, and add additional CapEx if you're growing the company in your model. If your rev & EBITDA estimates are flat then reduce CapEx in proportion to sales in your estimates.
STL Cardinals
-
-
01-23-2015, 09:32 PM #4229
Why would you invest in a company you have no clue what their future investing activities will be like?
If it's at least a middle cap company, and there are no future intents of expansion projects in their statements, then project capex from historicals, and compare the cash flow and income statement margins to peers. The FCFF is a function of NOPLAT, g, and ROIC. Project the middle line, growth assumptions going forward, and the historical ROIC, for high growth and stable periods. That's the quick dirty method.PhD in Hairloss bro-science
-
01-24-2015, 09:10 AM #4230
Hope everyone is well.
Been struggling with a fairly severe case of alcoholism for about the past 5 or so years and finally decided to tackle it. Went in for a blood check and the doctor pretty much told me I won't make it to 40 with how I was living... Or rather how I was dying. To put a perspective on it, I was drinking a fifth (0.75 liters) and several beers per night, so about 15-20 drinks. This included week days. Drinking a lot isn't cool after you're over the age of 17, but regardless, the volume and it's effect became my reality.
It's an exhaustive process to be honest and taking a lot of my resources (time and energy, certainly not money, I've been saving a ton by not drinking). Luckily found one of those "red pill" girls who helps kick me out of bed at 5 am to go train and can cook at a Michelin level on top of being a nationally competitive oly lifter.
But, short write up I texted my buddy when he had a question about halliburton earlier today:
Oil is tricky. A big question is how much of the "cost of a barrel of oil" is sunk costs, maintenance, extraction costs, transportation, refining, etc.
I can't put an exact dollar amount on it, but the sunk costs are huge. So for some extractors, even if their overall "cost" is higher than what they get for it, they may still keep pumping because the variable costs are smaller than their revenue. It's the old Econ 101 dilemma of when do you stay in operation when you're losing money and when do you shut down (which is when variable costs exceed revenues).
With oil we can probably say that things outside of pure supply and demand are a factor in prices. However, for oil prices to remain low, supply needs to either remain high, or demand needs to crater.
Developing countries are by default inefficient energy users and have large population growth rates. Fundamentally, oil isn't going anywhere for quite awhile. Even if everyone in the us is using teslas, everyone in ****ing ****lia is going to be using ratchet 25 year old cars and motorcycles and power generators.
So for supply to remain high, production needs to remain high. Halliburton is largely an oil services company. As long as people keep pumping, Halliburton will keep working.
Also the patents, technology, contracts, etc. that Halliburton still has are valuable. I think the market is being over reactive and myopic on Halliburton.
Just checked LMT today and wanted to vomit. Got it at around 80ish or so a couple years back. I flipped it at about 120 for apple which I flipped again. Even though I made money off of allocating the cash elsewhere. I should have kept it there >< Between the dividends I would have received and stock price appreciation it would have been nice.
I've been pretty disconnected from the markets with the exception of news and when it directly relates to economics. Hoping to get back into it. Been reviewing my past investment history and I think my best bets have been on beaten down blue chips (like apple and LMT). Here's my theory. Companies, the major ones, have **** in the pipelines that often take years to bring to market. The investment world is so focused on what have you done for me lately, new product releases, etc.
With the exception of technological disruption or companies becoming out of touch with the consumer, i think most of these companies bounce back well eventually.
Btw started getting into Olympic lifting. It's getting scary how quickly I'm advancing and how much weight I'm lifting on some of the related lifts like power snatches and front squats. I've been pretty damn good at rugby and could have been ok at power lifting, but this is a whole new ball game.Last edited by arem20; 01-24-2015 at 09:29 AM.
*True Detective Crew*
*JUICY J Twerk Scholarship Troll Crew*
"The accumulation and the repayment of debt basically drives every economic cycle that there is."
-PTJ
Bookmarks