I always see people doing cable curls (standing up, laying down, you see it all)
I never did them cuz i feel theyre a bit restrictive
Am i missing something here?
|
Thread: Why do cable curls?
-
09-23-2011, 12:56 PM #1
-
09-23-2011, 01:07 PM #2
-
09-23-2011, 01:08 PM #3
I think that the general consensus is that cable curls keep the tension on the target muscle for the entire movement. I'm sure there is some great scientific reason that Tyciol will be more than happy to explain.
In my current experience, I have VERY bad tendonitis. BB Curls and DB Curls are excruciating lifting from the hanging position. But doing cable curls seems to cause a lot less pain for me because the weight never really hangs dead.Last edited by LoneWolf2006; 09-23-2011 at 01:09 PM. Reason: See above. He beat me to it.
Trying....is planning to fail.
-
09-23-2011, 01:08 PM #4
-
-
09-23-2011, 01:15 PM #5
-
09-23-2011, 01:16 PM #6
Lol what?
The resistance is the same during the concentric (positive) or eccentric (negative) phase of the contraction with freeweight. The difference between freeweight and cable is, as said above, constant tension during the full ROM. If you have 50 lbs at the beginning of the contraction, you still have 50 lbs at the peak contraction.☆ ☆ QUEBEC CREW ☆ ☆
OW log :
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=149575693&p=977696913#post977696913
Competition lift : 212 kg total (95/117) @ 77 kg
-
09-23-2011, 01:19 PM #7
-
09-23-2011, 01:40 PM #8
-
-
09-23-2011, 02:05 PM #9
-
09-23-2011, 03:54 PM #10
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 484
- Rep Power: 640
They're a good change of pace movement.
I suggest guys out there with longer arms like me, to give them a shot. I love any variation of a cable curl (except the overhead cable crossover one ppl do).
Cable preacher curls are awesome. With free weight there is a point at the apex of the movement where it feels like tension is lost (similar to flies for chest). With cables that doesn't exist and it is a great movement.
-
09-24-2011, 08:56 AM #11
-
09-24-2011, 09:18 AM #12
-
-
09-24-2011, 09:21 AM #13
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 223
- Rep Power: 221
You can speed up the BB,DB to get it past a sticking point fairly easy.
Cables on the other hand have multiple pulleys. Its next to impossible to speed that up when you're doing good weight. The extra pulleys minimize/eliminate the inertial so no matter how fast you speed it up for the easy part, its always going to get you at the sticking point.
Try to find bottom pull cable without multiple pulleys, find a direct drive pulley system and lift it the same way as you'd lift with a BB. You'd quickly found out that the weight reacts almost the same, then do a set on a multiple pulley (most common) and you'll see the difference.Back log
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=138027343
-
09-24-2011, 09:23 AM #14
Your mom is too heavy for weight lifting. I cant deadlift over 405 yet, sry :s
Haha, seriously...the weight still the same, true, but the tension on your muscle vary. Its like when you do a DB flat bench fly. Once you reach the top, your chest is barely stress by the weight. You are just holding DB in front of you. Instead, if you are using cable, your chest is under tension when you hold the contraction at the top because of the pulley.
Get it? I hope I was clear :s☆ ☆ QUEBEC CREW ☆ ☆
OW log :
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=149575693&p=977696913#post977696913
Competition lift : 212 kg total (95/117) @ 77 kg
-
09-24-2011, 09:26 AM #15
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 223
- Rep Power: 221
-
09-24-2011, 09:36 AM #16
Similar Threads
-
babrbell curls vs cable curls
By beeg4077 in forum ExercisesReplies: 22Last Post: 09-21-2006, 01:40 PM
Bookmarks