GTR
But i'll just leave this here for the HNNGGGGGGGGGG
|
|
Results 241 to 270 of 325
-
10-01-2012, 03:59 AM #241Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 562
- Rep Power: 2107
-
10-01-2012, 04:04 AM #242Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 948
- Rep Power: 0
i was lucky enough to drive both gallardo and 430 .. I wouldnt even think about nissan, yeah the performance is amazing but who gives a phuck about japanese computer powered satellite whatverOriginally Posted by iAmKingDuy
.. I would go
For lambo but thats just personal opinion. Just check how many reviews and comparisions were there back in 2009 trying to figure out which one is better, with no strict verdict.. But mate please dont pick frickin nissan
-
10-01-2012, 04:05 AM #243*Platinum Account*
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: North Carolina, Singapore
- Posts: 11,601
- Rep Power: 29517
no maserati?
Sloots come and go but moms are forever
Get to know your parents: you never know when they'll be gone for good.
Be nice to your siblings: they're your best link to your past and the people most likely to stick with you in the future.
Enjoy your body: use it every way you can. Don't be afraid of it or of what other people think of it: it's the greatest instrument you'll ever own.
-
10-01-2012, 12:34 PM #244Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Netherlands
- Age: 33
- Posts: 356
- Rep Power: 238
any updates op?
-
-
10-01-2012, 01:30 PM #245Apparently maintenance for it is way too high. I doubt it'd be higher than a Lambo or Ferrari but meh...Originally Posted by meteoraniac
no maserati?
-
10-01-2012, 01:32 PM #246Respeck it
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 3,128
- Rep Power: 604
GTR. fast, decently sexy, and new
but id take a 2013 gallardo performante or 2013 458 spyder over it anydayI'm Negan
-
10-01-2012, 01:37 PM #247trying to bulk
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Posts: 3,922
- Rep Power: 832
Strong comparing 100k car to 250k carsOriginally Posted by Goncho
Shaking Manuel Crew
-
10-01-2012, 01:37 PM #248Totally different price range.Originally Posted by Goncho
-
-
10-01-2012, 01:42 PM #249Originally Posted by StallionRx
-
10-01-2012, 01:52 PM #250Live.Laugh.Love<3 #SwAg
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Posts: 11,132
- Rep Power: 19501
why the fu*k are you not considering a maserati granturismo?
-
10-01-2012, 02:07 PM #251trying to bulk
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Posts: 3,922
- Rep Power: 832
Why do you not read? Literally 3 posts above youOriginally Posted by neighborr
Shaking Manuel Crew
-
10-01-2012, 02:09 PM #252Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 12,637
- Rep Power: 30018
Lambo hands down.
-
-
10-01-2012, 02:11 PM #253Tyrael: Mod of Justice.
- Join Date: May 2069
- Location: Phoenix, Arizona, United States
- Posts: 21,758
- Rep Power: 1326428
F430....
but im slightly bias.|Red Wings|Badgers|Packers|
PSN: mrawdtsi
Diablo 3 - mrawdtsi#1153
*Mods/CS will not, nor can they change your username, so don't ask*
*Mods/CS will not, nor can they mass delete your post history or account, so don't ask*
*Requests for the above will result in negs, its getting out of hand*
- if you're really asking for something like this, you need to re-evaluate your post behavior on these forums.
-
10-01-2012, 02:12 PM #254Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Age: 34
- Posts: 1,526
- Rep Power: 0
the lamborghini and ferrari look like girl cars and are WAY too SMALL for my taste.
a new GTR or a Maserrati coupe or 4-door would be better.
edit: to put it in perspective, the laborghini is the same length as an Acura RSX lol
why would i spend $200k on a tiny, cramped car like that?
-
10-01-2012, 02:27 PM #255Registered Misc CEO
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 4,127
- Rep Power: 81183
This seriously has to be the most retarded comparison I've read on here in a while. Yes, compare a car that the rear firewall stops against the front seats to interior legroom of that of a car with a smaller cabin that then had 4 seats crammed into it. Makes sense.Originally Posted by nontansto
OP, I know we are 6 pages in, but to add some real world insight, if you're looking at the LP560's, definitely that over the 430 and either over a gtr. If you're looking at the standard 04-08 Gallardo, it'd be a toss up between that and the 430 as they are about even. In neither case with those other two cars as options would I pick the GTR. Having said that, I do like them in general though.
you would fit with plenty of room to spare...Originally Posted by nontansto
-
10-01-2012, 02:28 PM #256Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2011
- Age: 35
- Posts: 2,200
- Rep Power: 775
Ferrari. These cars are BOSS.
"Grab your phucking nuts for once in your life. Have some ownership, some credibility behind your words and actions. Mean what you say; do what you say. Follow through for something for one time in your life. ONE TIME, one time in your life. You will feel high a you've never felt before. When you follow through with things in life guys, you achieve the confidence & mentality that anything is possible"
- Gregg Pitt
-
-
10-01-2012, 02:31 PM #257Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Age: 37
- Posts: 2,465
- Rep Power: 2323
Godzilla.
Just Bleed
Interstellar Crew
Married Crew
-
10-01-2012, 02:31 PM #258trying to bulk
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Posts: 3,922
- Rep Power: 832
Originally Posted by nontansto
the lamborghini and ferrari look like girl cars and are WAY too SMALL for my taste.
a new GTR or a Maserrati coupe or 4-door would be better.
edit: to put it in perspective, the laborghini is the same length as an Acura RSX lol
why would i spend $200k on a tiny, cramped car like that?
On a scale of Down syndrome to never finishing junior high how retarded are you?Shaking Manuel Crew
-
10-01-2012, 02:34 PM #259Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Location: East Lansing, Michigan, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 4,296
- Rep Power: 3718
Honestly, I'd get the 2013 Viper.
I'm biased as I drive a challenger SRT8, but most torque in any NA engine
-
10-01-2012, 02:35 PM #260Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Age: 34
- Posts: 1,526
- Rep Power: 0
LMAO at using "rear firewall stops" in your argument. in case you havent noticed the gallardo has its engine IN THE REAR MORON, making it just as cramped, so your theory is complete BS.Originally Posted by 1fast1
are you seriously telling me this THING IS ROOMY? just go, your embarrasing yourself
-
-
10-01-2012, 02:39 PM #261Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 8,065
- Rep Power: 4955
OP, if you can afford those cars you can afford to take one out on a track before you purchase.
To be honest, if you aren't buying them for the track they are a waste of money.“To have faith is to trust yourself to the water. When you swim you don't grab hold of the water, because if you do you will sink and drown. Instead you relax, and float.” ― Alan Watts
-
10-01-2012, 02:39 PM #262trying to bulk
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Posts: 3,922
- Rep Power: 832
Originally Posted by nontansto
LMAO at using "rear firewall stops" in your argument. in case you havent noticed the gallardo has its engine IN THE REAR MORON, making it just as cramped, so your theory is complete BS.
are you seriously telling me this THING IS ROOMY? just go, your embarrasing yourself
Other guy that replied to you is pretty retarded but you are pretty fcking stupid....
A) it is roomy for a two seater
B) Its way wider then it looks in real life
C) It's a sports car.... they're not supposed to be big, smaller = better handling.
D) Urine idiotShaking Manuel Crew
-
10-01-2012, 02:54 PM #263Registered Misc CEO
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 4,127
- Rep Power: 81183
I'm telling you that I OWN one, am 6' 4" tall now and have a tall mohawk, and I fit JUST FINE. So you being all of 6' 180 lbs, you would fit just fine.Originally Posted by nontansto
As far as the engine being in the back and why that's important/relevant...it's still called a firewall and it lands against the front seat. YOUR comparison about interior room has the driver sitting so far forward because they have room for the REAR seats before the REAR of the cab ends. I'm not sure how you don't comprehend this. ADDITIONALLY, the front of the Gallardo is short/stubby as it's just a luggage area so the short nose allows for EVEN MORE room on top of the fact that it only has to make room for two. So, folks like me, we have plenty of room to drive our Lambo's.
-
10-01-2012, 02:55 PM #264Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Age: 34
- Posts: 1,526
- Rep Power: 0
wat. your skewing my argument completely. i dont care if its good for a two seater. the fact is its still TINY and costs 200k. If I'm going to spend lots of money, I want something comfortable with lots of room. the older ferraris and lambos were much longer, now they are ****gy time small.Originally Posted by arekieh
C) It's a sports car.... they're not supposed to be big, smaller = better handling.
Its a sports car, exactly. Its not that functional for everyday use, its built more for aesthetics. A tiny, 172 inch length Lamborghini looks childish.
The older cars looked much better:
the gallardo seems like a cheapy version of a lamborghini to bring more customers in (just so people can say they own a lamborghini), kinda like those new cheaper bmw base models.
-
-
10-01-2012, 02:56 PM #265Registered Misc CEO
- Join Date: Sep 2006
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Posts: 4,127
- Rep Power: 81183
actually, I'm not. I'm speaking as a member of the SAE, a mechanical engineering background, and a Lamborghini Gallardo OWNER. so, of ALL the people that have posted yet, I'd say I have plenty of knowledge for making such statements.Originally Posted by arekieh
-
10-01-2012, 02:59 PM #266Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Age: 42
- Posts: 4,075
- Rep Power: 6844
isn't it ferrari engine and therefore ferrari maintenance?Originally Posted by iAmKingDuy
-
10-01-2012, 03:03 PM #267Approximately Accurate
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 6,723
- Rep Power: 10261
If you're really ballin (I am not) and you already have a daily, I don't see why you shouldn't go for a F-car, Lambo, or R8.
If you're going to drive it more than once or twice a month, get a GTR, M3, AMG or something along those lines.Thin privilege is why Samwell Tarly is a steward and not a ranger.
-
10-01-2012, 03:03 PM #268Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Age: 31
- Posts: 604
- Rep Power: 243
Originally Posted by AK911PSU
This. I mean, as far as performance goes, they are all plenty fast. I drove a honda S2000 last week and it was fast as hell, I've driven my dads M5 and that thing just burns down the road. It throws you back into the seat and has plenty of power. Sooooo I cant even imagine how fast these cars are. I think the Ferrari is a beautiful car. For me itd be between ferrari and GTR. GTR is probably a little faster, and you have the luxury that comes with a brand new car. I guarantee the ferrari was babied by its owner too though and is probably like new. I'd get the ferrari because I've always loved em but yeah. Just my opinion..
-
-
10-01-2012, 03:09 PM #269Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Age: 42
- Posts: 4,075
- Rep Power: 6844
My analysis:
If you want a fun car to drive, care about going fast, and want the "FASTEST" thing on the road, then get the GTR but be prepared to have every ricer stop you and try to race, and also to have most chicks and 50% of guys not give a **** about your car because its a nissan.
If you want a car that can turn heads and will impress chicks and most dudes get the lambo. you can still drive it every day including in rain etc and it will probably be pretty reliable since it is an audi anyway. (i think)
If you want a car with true race heritage get the 430 but know that the 458 ****s on it all day every day in terms of aesthetics and performance.
Overall, i'd probably pick the lambo. awd is pretty nice. also i'd get an older lambo not the newer LP560 because i don't care about having the fastest one.
-
10-01-2012, 03:09 PM #270know a guy that uses a 2010 gtr as a daily winter car in fargo north dakota. has a gt3 for the summer.Originally Posted by Lukas13
personally, the way i've always seen it is, a lambo is for people who can't afford ferraris. maintenance is cheaper on the lambos etc... the 12k miles on the ferrari is an issue since they have major maintenance at 15k miles i believe.
.. I would go
Bookmarks