|
Thread: My theory on dumbbells (srs)
-
05-22-2012, 11:13 AM #121
-
05-22-2012, 11:13 AM #122
Not going through all the responses (first page was enough). Is NO ONE going to mention UNCERTAINTY????
e.g
One dumbbell manufacturer makes dumbbells with the following specifications: x lbs +-5% and sells them for $0.8x
Another dumbbell manufacturer makes them with an uncertainty of +-2% and sells them for $1.2x
The more you pay, the more accurate and precise the weight of the dumbbells is. Do you dumbfukks think the 100lb dumbbell weighs exactly 100.00lbs? (dumbfukks = not directed at everyone. just a couple of full retard responses)The opposite of courage in our society is not cowardice, it is conformity. -Rollo May
*Misc Ink Crew*
http://www.angry-developer.com/
-
05-22-2012, 11:16 AM #123
-
05-22-2012, 11:17 AM #124
-
-
05-22-2012, 11:17 AM #125
-
05-22-2012, 11:19 AM #126
-
05-22-2012, 11:30 AM #127
-
05-22-2012, 11:33 AM #128
The 100's at my gym are actually 105's. Its 100lbs added to the handle which itself is 5lbs. But that is just my gym. I don't know about other gyms.
Im pretty sure this is what the OP meant. The 90s in rubber weigh less than the ''90s'' in metal because the handle is an extra 5 pounds. Again that is at my gym and yes I have actualy weighed the weights.Last edited by nrrich; 05-22-2012 at 11:43 AM.
I rape back.
-
-
05-22-2012, 11:33 AM #129
-
05-22-2012, 11:37 AM #130
-
05-22-2012, 11:55 AM #131
-
05-22-2012, 11:57 AM #132
-
-
05-22-2012, 12:07 PM #133
-
05-22-2012, 12:13 PM #134
-
05-22-2012, 12:33 PM #135
-
05-22-2012, 12:34 PM #136
-
-
05-22-2012, 08:28 PM #137
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 5,784
- Rep Power: 0
-
05-23-2012, 12:14 PM #138
-
05-23-2012, 12:17 PM #139
-
05-23-2012, 12:18 PM #140
-
-
05-23-2012, 12:19 PM #141
-
05-23-2012, 12:27 PM #142
-
05-23-2012, 12:29 PM #143
-
05-23-2012, 12:31 PM #144
could also be the handle, one being harder to exert maximal force on. I have 2 barbells at my gym, one thick and one thinner. I've checked and both weigh the same but I find the thicker one harder to lift. perhaps because of more focus on grip and forearms. but i too have noticed the metal weights seem heavier
-
-
05-23-2012, 12:36 PM #145
-
05-23-2012, 12:36 PM #146
-
05-23-2012, 12:48 PM #147
Different brands = different weights. Which is why you should always have the same brand weights on each side.
They are.
It has nothing to do with new vs old. It has to do with the manufacturer. Some of them may be a pound or two under, some may be a pound or two over, some may be right on the money.
Again, this is why you always lift the same brand weights on both sides.
-
05-23-2012, 12:52 PM #148
-
-
05-23-2012, 12:59 PM #149
this.
I think the iron dbs are heavier because they are labelled differently. There are 2 sets of dbs at my gym, one set is metal the other set is covered in rubber. I was doing incline db press with 50s one day with the rubber ones, and for whatever reason I switched to the metal ones for my 2nd set. There was a noticeable difference in weight cause I could barely get the metal ones up. I got the rubber ones up for 8 and the metal ones for barely 4.
Then I decided to weigh them both and the rubber ones were correctly labelled at 50, but the metal ones were 52.5. I think that's cause the handle is not accounted for in the metal ones.Routine: PHAT
Beg- (Jan 21 '12): S:190x5 B:155x5 D:260x5 (BW: 152)(BF:16%)
End- (Apr 30 '12): S:230x5 B:175x4 D:320x5 (BW: 162)(BF:18%)
Goal (Apr 30 '12): S:225x5 (MET) B:185x5 (MISSED) D:295x5 (DEMOLISHED) (BW: 170) (FAILED)
Current Lifts: S:230x5 B:180x5 D:325x5 (6'1 163 16%) (Mar 3 '13)
Curr Estimated 1RM: S:275 / B:215 / D:375 Total: 865 (BW: 163) (Mar '13)
Prior Best Estimated 1RM: S:270 / B:205 / D:370 Total: 845 (BW: 162) (Apr '12)
-
05-26-2012, 02:25 AM #150
Similar Threads
-
Got exercise/reps/sets/bodyparts,etc questions? Ask your **** here [SRS]
By bybon in forum Misc.Replies: 1948Last Post: 01-06-2018, 02:27 PM
Bookmarks