|
-
03-27-2012, 08:58 PM #31
-
03-27-2012, 08:58 PM #32
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:00 PM #33
I advocate shooting hostile people who invade another sovereign country
The two million don't deserve to get shot. Only the people who cross the border because at that point their presence poses a security and stability risk
They can protest all they want in their home countries. But once you cross the border of another country that warned you not too at that point they have the right to defend themselves.
Moral of the story
Don't want to get hurt-- don't invade other sovereign countries(●•̃)
/█\
.Π.
<3 Gif_Brah + Skeptical_Hippo
❤♚ Conservative Crew ♚❤
┊ ┊ ┊ ┊
┊ ┊ ┊ ★
┊ ┊ ☆
┊ ★
☆
-
03-27-2012, 09:01 PM #34
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,465
- Rep Power: 76566
You quote me and argue against shooting people.
OP's the one who said this. If you want to rebut this argument... quote him!
Not practical. Why suggest something that's impractical?
People like you who stir up sht by jumping at "zionist shadows" behind every bush?My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
-
03-27-2012, 09:01 PM #35'On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White' - Rochelle Gutierrez, Professor of Mathematics at the University of Illinois.
-
03-27-2012, 09:04 PM #36
I didn't invade anything. No idea what you're talking about.
I don't even know anyone in Israel if you want me to be honest. I'm just a reasonable person who believes that all countries have the right to protect their borders. Honestly, if 2 million Greeks decided to invade Turkey, irregardless of the circumstances i would say the exact same thing.(●•̃)
/█\
.Π.
<3 Gif_Brah + Skeptical_Hippo
❤♚ Conservative Crew ♚❤
┊ ┊ ┊ ┊
┊ ┊ ┊ ★
┊ ┊ ☆
┊ ★
☆
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:09 PM #37
Im not stirring up ****, i have no reason to (unlike disinfo agents - which do exist).
What im trying to do is bring light on the source of all the problems in the world. Think big sir, the problem spans worldwide and involves zionist forces - if you wanna discuss the little things such as what the Israeli's should do - im giving you the answers.
Its irrelevant if only 1 gets shot or 1 million. The problem is greater than that and until the day where citizens of Israel, the US, and others supporting the zionist cause become aware that they're being taken for a ride then these worldwide problems are only going to become larger and larger.
Just read the news - the US announces a middle-east AND asia branch to their missile defense sheild - another blow to world peace and stability, how can you refute that the US (which many zionists are in power of) isn't overstepping their boundaries (which they have for the past few decades).??
-
03-27-2012, 09:10 PM #38
-
03-27-2012, 09:12 PM #39
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Kansas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 2,494
- Rep Power: 5958
I think it would depend on the volume of people trying to cross the border. I can assure if it is even 1% of two million it would be unmanageable, and at that point if deadly force is the only way to neutralize the threat then yes, do what you have to.
That said, if I am standing watch, I am not going to open fire on two dudes climbing a fence (deployed... I dont know what I would do at home station) but 250 guys climbing the fence are a tremendous risk, and depending on subscribed rules engagement, I would.
I think the first two posts about land mines and mowing people down With machine guns just rubbed me the wrong way.Last edited by Jpenn89; 03-27-2012 at 09:19 PM.
Starting weight- May 14 2011- 184
Current weight- 136
"Life is but a game, And once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box. No matter our nobility, we all emulate the same end. So take no pride in it, for it is but an illusion, we will reach upon the point where we will be judged standing alongside those we have commanded. Whether or not we treated them fairly predicts our outcome."
Reps owed:
-
03-27-2012, 09:12 PM #40
If you look back, i quoted two posters and replied accordingly. It is not my fault if you cannot differentiate. Grow up your being a *******. Its not impractical to arrest those who break the law. It is however completely barbaric to shoot innocent protestors simply because the IDF cannot handle the situation which was the OP's original statement. As i previously stated, there are many different ways to handle the situation without using deadly and unnecessary force.Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:14 PM #41
-
03-27-2012, 09:20 PM #42
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,465
- Rep Power: 76566
-
03-27-2012, 09:20 PM #43
The rights of the Palestinians is debatable. If we assume that it is Palestinian land, then we agree they have a right to protest. If we assume that the land is now legally Israels, then they have no right to protest. This argument is old and unresolved. Irrespective of this fact, crossing a boarder illegaly does not require deadly force. The only reason this is being put forth as a solution is because of the volume of protestors. IMO, volume does not mean logic should be thrown out the window. It is not ok to shoot and kill an individual for crossing a boarder illegally, hence it is not ok IMO, to shoot and kill any of the 2 million protestors who cross the boarder illegaly.Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
-
03-27-2012, 09:21 PM #44
Just like how your rants are always about Muslims taking over and shariah being infiltrated or freaking out over women wanting employer coverage of birth control.
So why are you so afraid to confront the people you hate?
Tell you what, why don't you go confront the Muslims you despise heavily and tell them to get out?
Why are you so afraid to speak your mind coward?
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:24 PM #45
Coming from someone who supported the invasion of Iraq while being too much of a little pussy to enlist in a war you personally support, do you have any room to talk?
Face it, you are a coward and your only respite is to post your fantasies on a religion forum of a bodybuilding web site because you're just another dork that plays too much Call of Duty.
-
03-27-2012, 09:25 PM #46
I understand what you are saying about arresting 2 million people. My point is 2 million people are not going to cross the boarder simultaneously. There are many other ways to deal with the situation. My statements are not directed solely at you even when quoted. I apologize if i am confusing you.Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
-
03-27-2012, 09:26 PM #47
-
03-27-2012, 09:27 PM #48
Uh no you wouldn't.
Just look at this thread.
Not only you are a hypocrite, but also a complete liar.
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:29 PM #49
There are plenty of people who hold your retarded positions who were all for going into war in Iraq (a simple stroll through the right-wing "counter-jihadist" sites is living proof of it).
Afghanistan was a different case since I agreed US had EVERY right to go in the nation that sheltered the same terrorists that murdered our people.
-
03-27-2012, 09:31 PM #50
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Kansas, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 2,494
- Rep Power: 5958
While I agree that deadly force is never ideal, you have to remove yourself from any emotions and look at it objectively.
Think of it this way. If one angry guy is teying to,get into your house, chances are tou arent going to pull out your twelve gauge and fire away... Now imagine 50 angry guys trying to break into your house. Locking the door and calling the cops wont work then. You would probably fire at the guy pushing his way through the door and hope the rest realize you arent fuking around.Starting weight- May 14 2011- 184
Current weight- 136
"Life is but a game, And once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box. No matter our nobility, we all emulate the same end. So take no pride in it, for it is but an illusion, we will reach upon the point where we will be judged standing alongside those we have commanded. Whether or not we treated them fairly predicts our outcome."
Reps owed:
-
03-27-2012, 09:33 PM #51
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,465
- Rep Power: 76566
I'm betting you don't speak your mind to Pakistani Muslims, or you'd have been stabbed.
OK, now we can dismiss arresting 2 million people as impractical.
Reality is, if they come, there will most likely be bloodshed, and the reality is also that if there is bloodshed, certain elements in that crowd will do everything in their power to encourage violence.
No need to apologise to me, but there are a number of "special" people on this site who seem easily confused. I'm thinking of them.My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
-
03-27-2012, 09:39 PM #52
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:41 PM #53
That is certainly a valid point but as previously stated, there are many other ways to deal with the situation without resorting to OP's original idea of shooting them, I believe you have already put forth some good points on crowd control. I am sick of this whole over reaction Israel seems to have regarding what they deem disobedience. It is macho bullshi-t and if they have their own citizens safety in mind, they should realize their behaviour is detrimental. People should be dealt with accordingly.Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
-
03-27-2012, 09:42 PM #54
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,465
- Rep Power: 76566
-
03-27-2012, 09:46 PM #55
We should have left Afghanistan a long time ago. There is no point of trying to nation build some third world country that was garbage before we went inside, is garbage while we're there, and will be garbage once we leave.
No point in wasting our time or resources.
You're just a stupid chicken hawk though. If you support the war in Afghanistan so much, why don't you join the military and go fight it? Nope you're just some idiot on an internet forum that plays too much COD(●•̃)
/█\
.Π.
<3 Gif_Brah + Skeptical_Hippo
❤♚ Conservative Crew ♚❤
┊ ┊ ┊ ┊
┊ ┊ ┊ ★
┊ ┊ ☆
┊ ★
☆
-
03-27-2012, 09:48 PM #56
-
-
03-27-2012, 09:54 PM #57
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Location: Australia
- Age: 52
- Posts: 33,465
- Rep Power: 76566
-
03-27-2012, 09:55 PM #58
Issue shoot to kill warning. Ignore warning. Shoot a few dozens and problem solved.
They can prove their point somewhere else.
If you are warned not to close the line, and you still do it, then you are asking for it. You know the consequences and you still want to prove your point? Well, play stupid game win stupid prize.
-
03-27-2012, 10:00 PM #59
Well if we originally hadn't supported the mujahideen and let the Soviets build up the country like Kazakhstan it would've been better off.
Soviet occupation was probably the best thing that has ever happened to the country in ages, especially for Afghan women.
You're just a stupid chicken hawk though. If you support the war in Afghanistan so much, why don't you join the military and go fight it? Nope you're just some idiot on an internet forum that plays too much COD
-
03-27-2012, 10:05 PM #60
It was the logical thing to do during the cold war. We had a policy of containment, the Soviets were attempting to establish communism in Afghanistan, only logical solution would be to fund the opposition. With 20/20 hindsight we should have just let the Soviets have it.
I was 16 when 9/11 happened and the invasion of Afghanistan occurred you stupid *******.
I was in middle school you stupid *******(●•̃)
/█\
.Π.
<3 Gif_Brah + Skeptical_Hippo
❤♚ Conservative Crew ♚❤
┊ ┊ ┊ ┊
┊ ┊ ┊ ★
┊ ┊ ☆
┊ ★
☆
Bookmarks