Reply
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered sick kunt Jherewhoisdere's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 2,557
    Rep Power: 8370
    Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000) Jherewhoisdere is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Jherewhoisdere is offline

    New study : Effects of a Modified GVT Program on Muscular Hypertrophy and Strength.

    Abstract

    German Volume Training (GVT), or the 10 sets method, has been used for decades by weightlifters to increase muscle mass. To date, no study has directly examined the training adaptations following GVT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a modified GVT intervention on muscular hypertrophy and strength. Nineteen healthy males were randomly assign to 6 weeks of 10 or 5 sets of 10 repetitions for specific compound resistance exercises included in a split-routine performed 3 times per week. . Total and regional lean body mass, muscle thickness, and muscle strength were measured before and after the training program. Across groups, there were significant increases in lean body mass measures, however greater increases in trunk (p = 0.043; ES = -0.21) and arm (p = 0.083; ES = -0.25) lean body mass favored the 5-SET group. No significant increases were found for leg lean body mass or measures of muscle thickness across groups. Significant increases were found across groups for muscular strength, with greater increases in the 5-SET group for bench press (p = 0.014; ES = -0.43) and lat pull-down (p = 0.003; ES = -0.54). It seems that the modified GVT program is no more effective than performing 5 sets per exercise for increasing muscle hypertrophy and strength. To maximize hypertrophic training effects it is recommended that 4-6 sets per exercise be performed, as it appears gains will plateau beyond this set range and may even regress due to overtraining.

    Copyright (C) 2016 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.
    http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Ab...ing.96210.aspx

    Originally Posted by Brad Schoenfeld
    Cool new study on German volume training carried out in resistance trained individuals. The results essentially show that benefits for volume peaked at around 14-18 sets per muscle per week. An important contribution to the literature; more such studies are needed so we can determine an approximate upper dose-response threshold for muscular adaptations.
    u mirin'?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Moderator SuffolkPunch's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2007
    Location: Suffolk, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
    Posts: 54,512
    Rep Power: 1340335
    SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz SuffolkPunch has the mod powerz
    SuffolkPunch is offline
    Cool. I had seen 10-20 given as the guideline before but this confirms and narrows it down - at least for that population.

    Next question is does this have to increase over time - and can you reset volume tolerance by taking time off or switching to a lower volume method (and perhaps higher intensity) for a while.
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    stretching blows boathead's Avatar
    Join Date: Jun 2007
    Location: New York, United States
    Posts: 6,196
    Rep Power: 14835
    boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) boathead is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    boathead is offline
    does it really narrow it down?

    were the different rep ranges using the same weight? or was the 5 set group at a higher intensity?
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Banned Nosferatu187's Avatar
    Join Date: Oct 2011
    Posts: 6,126
    Rep Power: 0
    Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000) Nosferatu187 is a splendid one to behold. (+10000)
    Nosferatu187 is offline
    Originally Posted by boathead View Post
    does it really narrow it down?

    were the different rep ranges using the same weight? or was the 5 set group at a higher intensity?


    10x10 = @ 20 rep max
    10x5 = @ 10 rep max

    so obviously intensity is way higher.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts