... why exactly did Trump have those documents in his home, relating to nuclear weapons and chit?
I mean regardless of whether the docs were classified or not (i.e. whether he had legal right to have them or not), why did he have them in his house in the first place? Did he want to keep those documents as a souvenir or something? Why not give that chit to the National Archives as soon as he left office
|
-
06-09-2023, 05:41 AM #1
As someone not fully familar with the story, can someone answer this simple question
-
06-09-2023, 05:45 AM #2
-
06-09-2023, 07:42 AM #3
-
06-09-2023, 07:52 AM #4
-
-
06-09-2023, 07:58 AM #5
-
06-09-2023, 08:00 AM #6
-
06-09-2023, 08:11 AM #7
-
06-09-2023, 08:12 AM #8
Based on the sensitive nature of the documents he apparently had, I'd say it's far more likely he knew they had value and he could profit from them. Why else would the Saudis just "give" his son in law $2 billion? Out of the kindness of their Saudi hearts? Now you know that can't be true cuz Saudis have no hearts. What did Jared give them in return?
-
-
06-09-2023, 08:17 AM #9
-
06-09-2023, 08:38 AM #10
-
06-09-2023, 08:47 AM #11
-
06-09-2023, 08:48 AM #12
-
-
06-09-2023, 08:53 AM #13
-
06-09-2023, 09:15 AM #14
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 19,742
- Rep Power: 88148
Typical process for analysts is to just throw the highest classification headers on documents that it could be to avoid getting in trouble for under classifying things.
A lot of Top Secret // SCI // SIGNIT // FIVE EYES documents are stories you can actually read about on the local news.
So with out knowing what was actually contained in the documents no on really knows.
This case is incredibly stupid though. He can easily say on his last day as president he "declared those documents declassified" and he is now g2g. There isn't a process for presidential declassification and he can share whatever he wants to who ever he wants as long as he held the office. If any of those documents came out post presidency there might be some problems.
However, my understanding is that this is common with ALL ex-presidents and standard procedure is to whine about it a little bit.Last edited by Austanian; 06-09-2023 at 09:24 AM.
Finance Degree - USAF INTEL - IIFYM - Injured Crew - KTM XCW300 - Single Track Trail Rider - NRA Supporter - Shunned from MFC - Libertarian - Pragmatist
B: 345, S 375, D 445
Trying to get your ideal outcome often leads to the passing up of practical alternatives that deny your adversaries theirs.
-
06-09-2023, 09:23 AM #15
-
06-09-2023, 09:25 AM #16
-
-
06-09-2023, 09:33 AM #17
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 19,742
- Rep Power: 88148
Holding the information violates the espionage law even with out intent to distribute.
If the documents were still classified he is in violation of
18 U.S. Code § 793
Section F 2.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
Note: Pretty much every high end official violates this. As been seen by Bush, Obama, Biden, Hilary... This DA is pursuing this because of politics.
The defense is the same. While president I declared it Unclassified.Finance Degree - USAF INTEL - IIFYM - Injured Crew - KTM XCW300 - Single Track Trail Rider - NRA Supporter - Shunned from MFC - Libertarian - Pragmatist
B: 345, S 375, D 445
Trying to get your ideal outcome often leads to the passing up of practical alternatives that deny your adversaries theirs.
-
06-09-2023, 09:43 AM #18
-
06-09-2023, 09:45 AM #19
No, groomer, there actually is a process for declassification whether it is done by the president or an agency in charge of classification, such as the CIA. There is a review process, certain information needs to be redacted, and it is published in a specific office and marked "declassified" so that others know its status has been downgraded.
-
06-09-2023, 09:50 AM #20
-
-
06-09-2023, 09:56 AM #21
-
06-09-2023, 10:00 AM #22
no, the statute has an intent and "knowingly" element:
(a)Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and ... becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924
-
06-09-2023, 10:04 AM #23
-
06-09-2023, 10:15 AM #24
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 19,742
- Rep Power: 88148
So you like making stuff up? I have a 10 inch dink and live in a mansion by the beach BTW I am Iron Man. Sooo fun...
For everyone else.
Most departments have a declassification process that was set up by the actual declassification authority. Because the Director of the CIA (a declassification authority) doesn't sit at his desk all day scratching things out. They instead delegate their authority with a set of processes and procedures. These policies and procedures must be used for anyone delegated by the Director of the CIA. The VAST majority of documents declassified go through this process.
The POTUS is not most departments and is a declassification authority he does not need to use the Director of the CIA's processes. He can take a classified document post it on a monitor at the a press briefing and he is g2g. While he is taking a piss by himself in a room he can state "I declare this declassified".
This is why I state that the date of the documents is important. Post presidency he does not have this power.Last edited by Austanian; 06-09-2023 at 11:07 AM.
Finance Degree - USAF INTEL - IIFYM - Injured Crew - KTM XCW300 - Single Track Trail Rider - NRA Supporter - Shunned from MFC - Libertarian - Pragmatist
B: 345, S 375, D 445
Trying to get your ideal outcome often leads to the passing up of practical alternatives that deny your adversaries theirs.
Bookmarks