http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18761593
"Adult male circumcision was not associated with sexual dysfunction. Circumcised men reported increased penile sensitivity and enhanced ease of reaching orgasm. These data indicate that integration of male circumcision into programs to reduce HIV risk is unlikely to adversely effect male sexual function."
Pwned.
|
Thread: Cut vs uncut: pwned
-
01-04-2011, 10:35 AM #1
Cut vs uncut: pwned
-
01-04-2011, 10:36 AM #2
-
01-04-2011, 10:36 AM #3
-
01-04-2011, 10:45 AM #4
I don't know if you're very unintelligent, or you're just trolling.
Anyway, here's the real deal on the sexual dysfunction caused by circumcision:
Impotence and sexual dysfunction. The nerves in the foreskin apparently provide an impulse to aid erection. Circumcision has long been associated with an increased incidence of impotence. Glover (1929) reported a case. Winkelmann (1959) suggested impotence as a possibility, as did Foley (1966). Stinson (1973) reported five cases. Palmer & Link (1979) reported two cases. More recently, additional evidence of sexual dysfunction after circumcision has emerged. Coursey et al. reported that the degradation in sexual function after circumcision is equivalent to the degradation experienced after anterior urethroplasty. Fink et al. reported statistically significant degradation in sexual function. A survey carried out in South Korea found that circumcised men reported painful erections, and diminished sexual pleasure, and a few reported curvature of the penis upon erection. Shen et al. (2004), in a study carried out in China, reported erectile dysfunction in 28.4 percent of the men in the study after circumcision, and 'weakened erectile confidence' in 34.7 percent.
http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/
The link above has the actual sources of these studies.
-
-
01-04-2011, 10:57 AM #5
pubmed vs a site that expresses its bias in its title. not making an arguement on the content ffs if anyone ever cites a website like that they would be kicked outta any respectable uni program. that website is absolutely worthless.next time link a published source that doesnt pick and choose info.
i wont make my kids get circumcised unless necessary. but ppl like golfpunk make our side look bad.
-
01-04-2011, 10:58 AM #6
-
01-04-2011, 10:58 AM #7
-
01-04-2011, 11:02 AM #8
-
-
01-04-2011, 11:02 AM #9
-
01-04-2011, 11:04 AM #10
-
01-04-2011, 11:04 AM #11
-
01-04-2011, 11:06 AM #12
-
-
01-04-2011, 11:06 AM #13
-
01-04-2011, 11:06 AM #14
-
01-04-2011, 11:06 AM #15
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 5,376
- Rep Power: 0
A couple of things.
I agree with the above statement. I don't understand why uncut guys are so obsessed with my weiner. They seem to be the most mad about it.
The argument that, "you feel less than you would if you were uncut", doesn't effect me in the least because if I've never known that it feels better or ever will, why does it matter? It feels 100% perfect because I've never felt it any different. I have nothing to compare it to idiots.
Lastly, this was their main argument. This was the foundation of their talking points. Their entire encompassing POV revolved around what this article disproves.
-my dick looks better than yours ever will (aesthetics)
-my dick is cleaner than your nasty dick
-vascularity and visible ribs ( my dick is jacked and low bf, you mad?)
-aesthetics rule sex organs, look at chicks vags. a nice vag is beautiful and sought after, wrinkly smushed up ones are not
-uncut are mad they got ugly dix (truth)
so stfu, you guys lose, u mad?
-
01-04-2011, 11:07 AM #16
-
-
01-04-2011, 11:08 AM #17
-
01-04-2011, 11:09 AM #18
-
01-04-2011, 11:10 AM #19
-
01-04-2011, 11:10 AM #20
-
-
01-04-2011, 11:10 AM #21
-
01-04-2011, 11:11 AM #22
-
01-04-2011, 11:12 AM #23
-
01-04-2011, 11:12 AM #24
-
-
01-04-2011, 11:12 AM #25
-
01-04-2011, 11:12 AM #26
-
01-04-2011, 11:14 AM #27
-
01-04-2011, 11:14 AM #28
-
-
01-04-2011, 11:15 AM #29
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 5,376
- Rep Power: 0
Tell me uncut ****s, I shave my beard. I look better and it's more socially appealing for me to shave my face. It FEELS better and i don't get things stuck to my face. Chicks dig the smoothness and softness of my shaven face and the way it makes what's underneath look aesthetically pleasing?
You still mad?
edit^ madness confirmed, they yet again can not formulate an argument. cut wins
thank you and good night
-
01-04-2011, 11:15 AM #30
Similar Threads
-
Cut vs. Uncut
By JuanDenver in forum Female BodybuildingReplies: 8Last Post: 05-21-2007, 03:00 PM
Bookmarks