http://stuff.co.nz/4561033a19716.html
The article cites a study involving 179 obese men and women. They all ate the same "healthy, weight-loss diet" and took in the same amount of calories. The only thing different between the two groups was eating patterns -- one group ate the traditional 3 meals a day, another ate 6 small meals a day.
Changes in weight, body fat, waist measurement, and blood sugar were not significantly different between the two groups.
Anyone care to discuss?
|
-
05-26-2008, 02:56 PM #1
New study debunks the benefits of 6 meals a day
-
05-26-2008, 02:58 PM #2
-
05-26-2008, 02:58 PM #3
-
05-26-2008, 03:02 PM #4
-
-
05-26-2008, 03:05 PM #5
-
05-26-2008, 03:05 PM #6
Wouldn't breaking down what you need to eat, to best serve on your daily schedule make more sense compared to eating 70gs of carbs before going to sleep?
How can you eat 3 meals and have optimal pre & post workout meals?
Obese vs Gym Goers.
I still believe it would be better to eat more smaller meals vs 3 large meals, the difference may not be great, but every little bit helps.
-
05-26-2008, 03:07 PM #7
-
05-26-2008, 03:21 PM #8
- Join Date: Apr 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 30,435
- Rep Power: 119193
Exactly.
The people in the study were in a controlled group where their calories were pre-determined. Tell 180 obese people in the real world to eat either 3 or 6 meals a day and you'll have people sooooooo hungry after having to wait an entire 5 hours between eating that they'll be putting down 2k calories per meal.
-
-
05-26-2008, 03:22 PM #9
-
05-26-2008, 03:25 PM #10
We are advised to eat 6 meals a day for many purposes.
It keeps your blood sugar levels stable.
Keep the metabolism burning by constantly having to metabolize
And it keeps us from getting hungry on a cut, and binging.
Those are all proven, maybe for obese people it doesnt matter but once you get down to bodybuilding the bf% is where it counts, and I strongly advocate the multi meal plan.The only person I compete against is myself, the cruelest of opponents
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=124389261 =Summer Cut Log.
-
05-26-2008, 03:26 PM #11
-
05-26-2008, 03:27 PM #12
-
-
05-26-2008, 03:28 PM #13
-
05-26-2008, 03:29 PM #14
-
05-26-2008, 03:30 PM #15
-
05-26-2008, 03:34 PM #16
- Join Date: Dec 2005
- Location: Olathe, Kansas, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 546
- Rep Power: 408
6 meals a day is just a way to get you buy more crap you don't need...
Seriously, do you think your body uses all the Aminos up you give your body at breakfast within two (2) hours?!?! Besides, who likes being bloated and uncomfortable all day? Bloating and stomach discomfort are a sign your body doesn't like what you're doing to it.
Seriously, I bet the supplement companies are going to come out with some "miracle protein" that enables you only have to eat 3x a day instead of 6-8...
BTW, its a myth the body can only digest 50g protein a meal... Your body doesn't even know when your meal is over.
Steak and Eggs anyone?glorify the Lord in all that you do =)
-
-
05-26-2008, 03:34 PM #17
-
05-26-2008, 03:35 PM #18
-
05-26-2008, 03:40 PM #19
one reason for 5-6 smaller meals throughout the day is insulin control. Large meals cause insulin spikes, which lead to fat storage. there are many reasons/benefits to 5-6 meals a day. but when it comes to weight loss, its all about caloric deficit. could go on for days about this topic, that study is worthless.
Time to get shredded!
-
05-26-2008, 03:51 PM #20
-
-
05-26-2008, 03:58 PM #21
-
05-26-2008, 04:33 PM #22
I disagree here. It comes down to how people react individually. Personally, I go about 5-6 hours between meals and find it a total pain in the ass to eat every 3 hours. Also, a 300 calorie meal or snack makes me violently hungry, which is why I prefer around 600-700 calories per meal.
I agree 6 meals allows those aiming for magical macro ratios to meet their goals and fully understand how people could get hungry between meals, but I that that's more a testament of their food choices and blood sugar levels more than eaten patterns.
-
05-26-2008, 04:54 PM #23
How much truth is in this article? Doesn't eating more meals a day increase metabolism, that's what I read in the articles on the main page.
If all it's good for is evening out a high macro meal plan, then adding an extra meal throughout the day is a lot more convenient than timing a meal every 3 hours. Currently I dislike how i'm deterred from doing normal things like visiting the doctor or going to events because i'll miss my 3 hour meal timing mark. Eating 4 meals or 5 at any time during the day I wish will add a lot more flexibility, if it has the same outcome of course.
-
05-26-2008, 05:14 PM #24
-
-
05-26-2008, 05:21 PM #25
-
05-26-2008, 05:24 PM #26
-
05-26-2008, 05:26 PM #27
Fat guy in a little coat lol
Seriously, this doesn't debunk the 6 meals a day, hell some of us eat 7-8 meals a day, whether we are cutting or bulking...
Difference between us and fat guys?
WE KNOW WHAT TO EAT, WHEN TO EAT AND HOW TO SEE RESULTS
Fat guys however, diet for 2 months, drop 10 lbs, then put 15 on because they go back to their old ways
End of story haha
-
05-26-2008, 05:30 PM #28
-
-
05-26-2008, 06:00 PM #29
I'm not sure I would always say three meals per day is going to beat six meals per day just because of this study.
Of course what meals you eat and how fast they digest matter too. If you ate three really slow digesting meals it would have the same effect as six really fast digesting meals.
No matter how you look at it is just about how calories are delivered to your body and how your body make use of those calories.
If we throw weightlifting into the mix there are significant glycogen synthesis rates to be thinking about that non-exercising or barely exercising obese people don't have in their equation.
-
05-26-2008, 06:03 PM #30
Bookmarks