"weighted chins" = underhand weighted pullups? is it correct? i just wonder about it because there is some controversy about pullups/chinups naming
|
-
02-18-2012, 03:45 AM #1
-
02-18-2012, 04:11 AM #2
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Lakeland, Florida, United States
- Age: 39
- Posts: 55,576
- Rep Power: 179273
9 times out of 10:
Chin up = Underhand/supinated
Pull up = Overhand/pronated
You'll get some people who say a chin up just has to do with the chin clearing the bar or whatever.
But I'm guessing if your program has called for "weighted chins", then yes, your thinking of underhand weighted pull ups is in line.-
Alchemist of Alcohol
-
-
-
Journal: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=126418493
-
02-18-2012, 04:19 AM #3
-
02-18-2012, 05:43 AM #4
-
-
02-18-2012, 05:53 AM #5
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Posts: 12,978
- Rep Power: 55086
Use the grip that feels best on your wrists/forearms. Most people are going to use a 'narrower than shoulders' grip while in the chin-up grip position. Many people will feel strain on their wrists/forearms with the chin-up grip at first. Use smart hand positioning to avoid that problem. A few inches here or there isn't going to change the muscles being recruited in this situation.
trainingwithryan.substack.com
-
02-18-2012, 07:38 AM #6
-
02-18-2012, 07:42 AM #7
-
02-18-2012, 12:46 PM #8
That's usually what people mean, yes. I'm fine with this as long as the chin reaches the bar, otherwise naming is senseless. Feel free to call overhand pull ups 'chins' if your chin also reaches the bar. It's much harder that way so you deserve the freedom.
Cause that's what it mean until people began to twist it, obviously. =/
Hm...
http://www.exrx.net/WeightExercises/.../AsChinup.html
Originally Posted by Marine Corps
-
-
02-19-2012, 04:13 AM #9
-
02-19-2012, 05:29 AM #10
Look I can do google searches too !!!!!!!!!!
http://stronglifts.com/how-to-do-pul...per-technique/
-
02-19-2012, 05:45 AM #11
-
02-19-2012, 06:04 AM #12
-
-
02-19-2012, 06:34 AM #13
-
02-19-2012, 08:50 AM #14
-
02-19-2012, 08:54 AM #15
-
02-19-2012, 08:58 AM #16
-
-
02-19-2012, 09:02 AM #17
-
02-19-2012, 09:17 AM #18
-
02-19-2012, 11:35 AM #19
No clue what this has to do with an overhand grip being called a chin.
That's great bro but doesn't serve a purpose, I'm already aware of the growing chin=supi and pull=pro popularity. My link is just to show that it hasn't always been this way, that it's a new meme. I'd wager it's less than half as old as "Romanian deadlift" which started in 91. The way people let language dominate them instead of dominating language is interesting. This of course leaves me open to an 'interesting how heavy weights'.
Can, but won't unless banned, and I don't break rules unlike many of my neggers.
Has ExRx been around that long? Love those guys. Yeah, the exercises were done for a long time and people got by fine without oversimplified names.
This is exactly the mental problem that made me pissed off at the terminology and reject it.
*watches the world crumble away*
What if you have a really close grip?
Also: I've repped you in the past but when you repped me back it was red!
-
02-19-2012, 12:20 PM #20
-
-
02-19-2012, 12:22 PM #21
1. Supinated pulls were chinups back in my grade school days. My humiliating inability to do them then, remains burned in my psyche forever.
2. David Willoughby's fine tome, "Super Athletes" written in 1970 records feats of strength regarding chins dating back to the late 1800s.
3. Both Jack LaLanne and Arnold have referenced in the past, a chinup contest they had in 1968 which Jack won handily. JLL set a chinup record in 1959 for 1000 in less than 90 minutes.Last edited by mrmrbill; 02-19-2012 at 12:33 PM.
-
02-19-2012, 12:25 PM #22
-
02-19-2012, 02:58 PM #23
I feel you, that's like me and when they brought in the rock climbing wall and I stalled ~10ft up. Common sense would say to help train students to do pull ups before renting an expensive climbing wall for a week, but that's public education for you.
I'm aware the term chin's been around for a long time, just saying it obviously originated based on pulling high enough to get the chin over the bar and not based on the ideal grip to do so. I doubt any of these old-time strong-men would be all "THAS NOT A CHIN IZ A PULLUP" if someone used the generally harder overhand grip and still got the chin over the bar. Usually the terms were interchangeable.
It's sort of like saying it's not a deadlift unless it's a mixed/hook grip deadlift. Or it's not a squat unless it's a powerlifter-style low-bar squat.
-
02-19-2012, 03:15 PM #24
-
-
02-19-2012, 04:35 PM #25
-
02-19-2012, 07:50 PM #26
I read it Mr Bill but are you telling me in grade school if you did an overhand grip your classmates/teacher would say "that's not a chin up!" even if you got your chin over the bar? It just seems odd. I think people were more sensible back then and focused more on the height of the pull than how you got there.
Tom you're pissing me off, you're my goal now, if you make a vid showing your max rep of chins I'll best it in a year.
-
02-19-2012, 07:56 PM #27
-
02-19-2012, 08:07 PM #28
nobody calls a chin-up a chin-up based on you putting your chin above the bar. Tyciol, honestly I would guess that you are guessing that that's where it came from.
One thing about supinated pulls is that your arm alignment allows you to pull yourself with the bar in front of you, where pronated grip allows you to pull easier if you are more underneath the bar. That is following the notion that your pronated grip is wider than your supinated grip, which is more practical for the way our arms are aligned.We're cookin' with gas now.
-
-
02-19-2012, 09:20 PM #29
They wouldn't say that. Since so few could do them, chin-up/pull-up was by personal choice to fulfill the "somehow get your head over the bar" requirement.
Sensible? Hrmmmph. It was the 70s -- nothing sensible about that. The baseline used, still today, for the Presidential Fitness awards is from 1985. That's when it was decided that an "average 50th percentile kid" age 7-9 realistically could do about 1 or 2. In the Seventies, we had to do like... 53 of them. Uphill.
-
02-19-2012, 09:35 PM #30
You have to understand, in Tyciol's world, it's far more important to ridiculously argue about what an exercise should be called than to post updated progress pics of what the exercise actually did to benefit his sucky physique.
ExtremistPullup who holds the world record for weighted pullups was told by Tyciol that he was wrong to call pullups pullups. I suppose Guinness, Extremist, and virtually every reg poster in this section are wrong.
And he still can't figure out why he was negged and will continue to be.
Either he is a troll or just retarded, maybe both.
Bookmarks