|
-
09-11-2013, 10:21 AM #31
-
09-11-2013, 10:21 AM #32
-
-
09-11-2013, 10:22 AM #33"Grab your phucking nuts for once in your life. Have some ownership, some credibility behind your words and actions. Mean what you say; do what you say. Follow through for something for one time in your life. ONE TIME, one time in your life. You will feel high a you've never felt before. When you follow through with things in life guys, you achieve the confidence & mentality that anything is possible"
- Gregg Pitt
-
09-11-2013, 10:23 AM #34
-
09-11-2013, 10:25 AM #35
Here's the real deal *******s, US and CIA are a buncha occultists that love to wage war and gather world's resources. They don't care about the people they napalm, nuke, clusterbomb or bring down the WTC for that matter. ALL they care about is spilling innocent blood to please their satanist masters. If you think any different, you're a grassfed premium sheep that deserves to;
A) Turned into a Bigmac
B) Given enough time to RESEARCH and wake up
choice is yours *******
RIP innocent 9/11 victims( ͡ʘ ͜ʖ ͡ʘ)
-
09-11-2013, 10:26 AM #36
-
-
09-11-2013, 10:28 AM #37
-
09-11-2013, 10:32 AM #38
It's on RT's website, too.
http://rt.com/shows/the-truthseeker/...terrorism-565/
Not sure why someone would upload it a year later. Maybe for channel views? The original "RT: The Truthseeker" segment is from 2012.
-
09-11-2013, 10:35 AM #39
-
09-11-2013, 10:37 AM #40
-
-
09-11-2013, 10:42 AM #41
-
09-11-2013, 10:44 AM #42
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 28
- Posts: 2,785
- Rep Power: 0
Larry Silverstein, who came in to acquisition of the lease for the twin towers six months prior to 9/11, immediately went about insuring it for a rediculous sum of money. It became known that he ordered the demolition of WTC #7 when his insurance claim was denied as fraudulent. He stated in a PBS documentary that they had at one juncture chosen to "Pull" the building. People who work in demolition have confirmed that "pull" is demoliotion industry jargon for "demolish." Larry Silverstein had WTC 7 pulled because it had been damaged extensively by internal fires caused by the aerial impacts that it had to be demolished, despite having been built to serve as a nuclear fallout shelter for high ranking government officials. Initially, Larry attempted to claim that WTC 7 fell on its own as a result of the impacts. WTC 6, located between WTC 1 and 2, was still standing after 1 and 2 collapsed. Larry was able to order WTC 7 to be demolished so swiftly despite the fact that it takes weeks or months to pre-wire for demolitions with explosives most likely because he was part of a grand plot to destroy WTC 1 and 2, and in the process, destroy many NSA files on international terrorism, which were located in WTC 7. Pretty much every sheet admitting that US gave money to Osama Bin Ladin, among other terrorists, was located in WTC 7. Popular conjecture is that some of those files stated things that US government did not want to leak. Larry's job was to reap the benefits from his insurance contract while playing the role of the victim who doesn't believe any thing the government said about all this was a lie. Larry attempted, in addition to a claim on WTC, to claim that the collapse of the twin towers was two events, not one, and that he should be entitled to 3+ billion dollars for the loss of a piece of property he'd only spent a few hundred million on and owned for six months.
Also yes if you didn't know, Osama Bin laden was a CIA assest during soviet trying to conquer Afghanistan. And they supported him right up until 9/11...<< This was said by an high ranking ex-CIA agent who said that the government lies to the people about alot of things. And this was one of his example...
-
09-11-2013, 10:45 AM #43
-
09-11-2013, 10:46 AM #44
-
-
09-11-2013, 10:48 AM #45
-
09-11-2013, 10:48 AM #46
-
09-11-2013, 10:51 AM #47
-
09-11-2013, 10:56 AM #48
-
-
09-11-2013, 10:58 AM #49
-
09-11-2013, 11:01 AM #50
-
09-11-2013, 11:01 AM #51
-
09-11-2013, 11:04 AM #52
-
-
09-11-2013, 11:10 AM #53
-
09-11-2013, 12:42 PM #54
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Location: Topeka, Kansas, United States
- Posts: 1,082
- Rep Power: 1301
-
09-11-2013, 01:24 PM #55
-
09-11-2013, 02:01 PM #56
-
-
09-11-2013, 03:42 PM #57
-
09-11-2013, 03:54 PM #58
-
09-11-2013, 04:34 PM #59
-
09-11-2013, 04:38 PM #60
- Join Date: Nov 2010
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 3,936
- Rep Power: 9137
When can we talk about this then? It's not like people don't talk about the civil war to spare civil war descendants feelings. What about Pearl Harbor? You should get my point. Im sorry but enough time has passed where personally I don't think we have to mind our P's and Q's around this subject.
Army Infantry Vet
OIF
*Libertarian Crew**Texas Born and Bred*
*F-150*
Alan Jackson is the GOAT
Bookmarks