Donald Trump's defense scrambles as bombshell tape branded 'critical' piece of evidence
https://www.the-express.com/news/pol...sh-money-trial
Drumpf was in on this all along.
Who would have thought?
|
Thread: Cohen just NUKED Drumpf lmaooo
-
05-13-2024, 11:14 AM #1
Cohen just NUKED Drumpf lmaooo
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
-
05-13-2024, 11:21 AM #2
-
05-13-2024, 11:21 AM #3
-
05-13-2024, 11:24 AM #4
OK so wtf was actually said on the tape?
Trump paid her - who cares? Prosecution hasn't shown that Trump's mental state, his intention for the payment, was to influence the election.---GIVE-------------------------------
-----ME-------------------------------
------LIBERTY------------------------
--or-----------------------------------
---GIVE-------------------------------
-----ME-------------------------------
------DEATH-------------------------
-
-
05-13-2024, 11:25 AM #5
-
05-13-2024, 11:25 AM #6
-
05-13-2024, 11:27 AM #7
-
05-13-2024, 11:29 AM #8
-
-
05-13-2024, 11:54 AM #9
I just heard part of the tape, not all of it but part... paraphrasing from memory
Cohen: I'll handle the financing
Trump: Wait, what financing?
Cohen: We'll have to pay him something
Trump: Pay with cash
Cohen: No, no, no, no. I've got this.
Yeah... totally nuked. If anything, what I heard from the tape implicates Cohen as the lead in any crime. The trouble is, there hasn't even been a legitimately alleged crime. The prosecutors literally don't even know what they're trying to prosecute.
This is an absolute joke of a case. Pretty sure it'll go direct to Merchan without even going to the Jury and he'll have no choice but to acquit.“The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” – Thomas Hobbes, 1588 – 1679
*Never Respond To RSM3 Threads crew*
-
05-13-2024, 11:57 AM #10
-
05-13-2024, 12:05 PM #11
-
05-13-2024, 12:05 PM #12
No Misc lawyer but how could Trump's legal team be scrambling and blind sided by this? I thought evidence had to be shared by both sides ahead of time, so they would be prepared as best they could by it. You also know it can't be that bad when its difficult to find out what exactly was said in the recording.
-
-
05-13-2024, 12:06 PM #13
-
05-13-2024, 12:10 PM #14
-
05-13-2024, 12:11 PM #15
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 26,320
- Rep Power: 352954
lol - more likely nuked the prosecutors case
Shipley had a good take on him being there to start with...
The reason an ethical prosecutor does not build a case based upon the information given to you by a guy like Cohen is NOT because you think the jury won't believe him and you might lose.
You don't build a case based on what Cohen says because there is no reason for an ethical prosecutor to believe what Cohen says.
When he admits all the lies he has told under oath, and he admits to having committed perjury to a federal judge as part of an effort to help himself, that doesn't just damage his credibility with a jury in trial, it should destroy his credibility in front of the investigators and prosecutors of the Manhattan DA's office when he sat down with them
It does not matter how much documentary or other evidence they have that corroborates Cohen
The only important issue is whether any part of his testimony will be recounting conversations with others where the only evidence of what was said in those conversations is his testimony.
To maintain his/her own credibility when dealing with someone like Cohen, a prosecutor should not be asking "Can a jury believe what he says?"
The prosecutor should be asking "Can I believe what Cohen says?"
Cohen's entire existence over the past 7-10 years makes the answer to that question an emphatic "NO!"
That answer means an ethical prosecutor could never call Cohen to the stand.“A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both.”
-
05-13-2024, 12:12 PM #16
-
-
05-13-2024, 12:15 PM #17
OP, there have got to be better things to spend your days thinking about. Trump isn't worth the real estate he's got in your mind. Much like when I caught myself watching Fox and realized it was toxic chit, that I was better off just turning it off and focusing/thinking about more important things. For me, the people around me, things I could influence or have some kind of impact with and vice-versa.
You keep getting spun up with Trump. I can't imagine that it's having a good impact on your world.All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
-
05-13-2024, 12:19 PM #18
-
05-13-2024, 12:19 PM #19
-
05-13-2024, 12:29 PM #20
-
-
05-13-2024, 12:42 PM #21
-
05-13-2024, 12:44 PM #22
-
05-13-2024, 12:45 PM #23
You saw that nyt poll right? These kangaroo courts are only causing trump to become MORE popular. Even morning joe did a rant about how they done goofed because if trump was out campaigning instead of talking about how he's trapped in court his approval would be lower.
Libtard strategists are finally starting to realize this has backfired. And when this court finds trump guilty its going to blow up in their faces even worseOfficial misc attaché to the Kremlin
Наше дело правое.
Враг будет разбит.
Победа будет за нами!
-
05-13-2024, 12:49 PM #24
-- He made NDA payments, which are not illegal
-- He didn't use campaign funds
-- The NDA could easily be related to not only the campaign, but his business empire, his family and personal life, etc.
The prosecution hasn't even laid out what was illegal about anything mentioned in the trial. Sure, they got the image of Trump in a court room and a story of MSM to paint Trump negatively. But seriously... what was illegal? The payments certainly weren't. I've heard they are saying that they were classified inappropriately... but he paid his lawyer for legal expenses (the lawyer wrote up and coordinated the NDA, which is legal assistance). So what was it supposed to be labelled? "Super secret hush money paints to sway the election?"
People on the stand are trying to say that if this news came out prior to the election, it would have swayed the results. But there was already the trump locker room talk tape released and plenty of women came forward prior to the election to try to dirty up trump with allegations. Do we really think a grifter like Stormy, who may or may not have engaged in the deed with Trump, would have done anything? It's not like the MSM was painting trump as a saint. 98% of his coverage was pure propaganda nonsense to bring him down.
-
-
05-13-2024, 12:51 PM #25
-
05-13-2024, 12:52 PM #26
-
05-13-2024, 12:52 PM #27
-
05-13-2024, 12:53 PM #28
-
-
05-13-2024, 12:56 PM #29
-
05-13-2024, 01:03 PM #30
Bookmarks