Theory: extending the right to vote to women has put western countries at risk

[Hesher]

Okay, so hear me out:

1) Women significantly more likely to have liberal voting patterns than men. Men tend to prefer courses of action involving things like war, or "get a fukking job". Women tend to prefer things like talking, and "what about the <fill in the blank with some group that supposedly needs help>?"

2) The primary threats to the safety and security of western nations are countries where there are limited civil rights, and the ability of women to participate in the political process is extremely limited.

3) Western nations have therefore become more peaceful than they have historically been, more open to people from other countries, more helpful to the poor, etc.

4) In a world where there are no threats to your nation, number 3 can be considered good or bad depending on your political leanings.

5) Unfortunately, we live in a world where the threats to western countries have no qualms about using extreme tactics, no tolerance for people of different backgrounds or faiths, and no limiting influence from women.


The net result is that western countries are now in a position where we effectively have one hand behind our back when it comes to dealing with threats.

The counter argument to that is that extending the right to vote to women is a basic human right, that no person should be denied. Unfortunately, by giving people rights, we are doing so at the expense of safety.

Will rights and freedom be able to triumph over those who respect neither? Hopefully so, but it's going to take the male part of the population to man up and stop trying to mimic the political views of the female half of our society in a misguided effort to win favor.

[peterplsss]

Okay, so hear me out:

1) Women significantly more likely to have liberal voting patterns than men. Men tend to prefer courses of action involving things like war, or "get a fukking job". Women tend to prefer things like talking, and "what about the <fill in the blank with some group that supposedly needs help>?"

2) The primary threats to the safety and security of western nations are countries where there are limited civil rights, and the ability of women to participate in the political process is extremely limited.

3) Western nations have therefore become more peaceful than they have historically been, more open to people from other countries, more helpful to the poor, etc.

4) In a world where there are no threats to your nation, number 3 can be considered good or bad depending on your political leanings.

5) Unfortunately, we live in a world where the threats to western countries have no qualms about using extreme tactics, no tolerance for people of different backgrounds or faiths, and no limiting influence from women.


The net result is that western countries are now in a position where we effectively have one hand behind our back when it comes to dealing with threats.

The counter argument to that is that extending the right to vote to women is a basic human right, that no person should be denied. Unfortunately, by giving people rights, we are doing so at the expense of safety.

Will rights and freedom be able to triumph over those who respect neither? Hopefully so, but it's going to take the male part of the population to man up and stop trying to mimic the political views of the female half of our society in a misguided effort to win favor.

Repped when off recharge srs. I mean I love women to death, but they are not psychologically built/meant to lead themselves, let alone millions/billions of people.

[badbl00d]

Strong totalitarian goals op.

[BlacksOnBlondes]

Age: 39
Posts: 6,909

[suave2000]

Damn it son you just went full misc. Take a break son this place is starting to affect you.

And lol @ taking about the threat of "extremism" while proposing an extremist action. What's next brah? not allowing minorities to vote?

[tucci420]

fkin lol. just lol.

[Hesher]

Strong totalitarian goals op.

Not totalitarian at all. Guys need to wake up and stop voting like they're women. There's a small minority of women out there who understand that voting liberal in our day and age isn't good for our national security, but they are totally trumped by "sensitive" men's voting patterns.

[HairyCrotchGuy]

why do you think germany is falling apart?






Women should never be in a position of leadership / power. They are simply not capable of such a thing

[Hesher]

Damn it son you just went full misc. Take a break son this place is starting to affect you.

And lol @ taking about the threat of "extremism" while proposing an extremist action. What's next brah? not allowing minorities to vote?

You're part of the problem. I encourage you to move to a country that is currently in a state of war. You'll moderate them, and the western world will have one less person who would sacrifice themselves to those who seek to do us harm.

Also, please quote me the extremist action that I proposed.

[badbl00d]

Not totalitarian at all. Guys need to wake up and stop voting like they're women. There's a small minority of women out there who understand that voting liberal in our day and age isn't good for our national security, but they are totally trumped by "sensitive" men's voting patterns.

Your theory calls into question the US constitution, and people's personal voter freedom. It's totalitarian.

[Hesher]

why do you think germany is falling apart?






Women should never be in a position of leadership / power. They are simply not capable of such a thing

Margaret Thatcher was a rare person. Merkel is no Thatcher.

[VoxExMachina]

Giving people the right to say whatever they want on the internet has put our country at risk.

Okay, so hear me out:

1) People think they are anonymous on the internet and say every sort of stupid thing, with basically no facts to back them up.

2) Weak willed people and poor thinkers who are pre-disposed to be easily influenced read such things and regurgitate such information to their equally soft-minded friends.

3) Due to the ease of spouting drivel through social media sites, other weak minds, racists, bigots, sexists, and every type of -phobe pick up on what they want to hear and pass it around like the clap.

4) In a world where we value freedom of speech over common sense, the plague spreads.

5) Unfortunately, we live in a world where idiots are common, political correctness runs rampant, laziness and entitlement are in full force, and people love to blame everyone except themselves for their problems.


The net result is that we are all becoming stupider and more infected over time.

Soon the Dolphins will rule the world.

[Condyle]

Strong totalitarian goals op.

This. And I have no time for modern feminists but that 'no vote' thing had to stop. I greatly admire the original suffragettes. They took zero bull****, alpha as hell.

A democracy by definition only works if everyone gets a vote. Once you begin picking and choosing, it takes no time for those in power to be the only ones who vote. Then you have a totalitarian dictatorship on your hands - if this is what you're after then restricting voting rights is an excellent way to do it.

Also, insert 'black' instead of 'woman' into many of your points and it could be directly from the '50s.

[suave2000]

You're part of the problem. I encourage you to move to a country that is currently in a state of war. You'll moderate them, and the western world will have one less person who would sacrifice themselves to those who seek to do us harm.

Also, please quote me the extremist action that I proposed.

brb not letting women vote
brb wanting to move "liberals" to war torn countries so they can die there

Yes brah I'm sure you're not an extremist at all... PHUCKEN LMAO

Is this an aware thread?

[Shrugs4Life]

You're not wrong OP. Historically women had no say in political affairs for good reason, they're not logical by nature. Women have many endearing characteristics such as compassion, empathy, love etc. Great qualities in a mother, grandmother, sister, wife etc. but not when you are trying to run a country. It explains the refugee crisis so well. Women just see these people on TV and feel so bad for them that they feel like we have to help them, without using any other critical thinking skills about the lasting effects of these people. It's why the Libs are running Canada again. Because a bunch of college aged girls think the Cons are "mean" and that we need someone who will acts just as whimsically as their menstrual cycles.

[WizardsOfAus]

Damn it son you just went full misc. Take a break son this place is starting to affect you.

And lol @ taking about the threat of "extremism" while proposing an extremist action. What's next brah? not allowing minorities to vote?

Negged. OPs post is right on the money and is only common sense, but you liberal cucks have to interject and tell him that he's an extremist? I bet you were raised by a single mother.

[Hesher]

brb not letting women vote
brb wanting to move "liberals" to war torn countries so they can die there

Yes brah I'm sure you're not an extremist at all... PHUCKEN LMAO

Is this an aware thread?

Where did I say that women shouldn't have the right to vote?

What I said was this:

The counter argument to that is that extending the right to vote to women is a basic human right, that no person should be denied. Unfortunately, by giving people rights, we are doing so at the expense of safety.

Will rights and freedom be able to triumph over those who respect neither? Hopefully so, but it's going to take the male part of the population to man up and stop trying to mimic the political views of the female half of our society in a misguided effort to win favor.

So, reading comprehension isn't your strength. Let's try this again:

1) Safety goes down
2) Number of human rights extended goes up.
3) We fight countries that don't believe in rights.
4) Wat do?
5) Men should stop trying to behave like women. Women behave like women, men behave like men, hopefully it all works out.

[SmithMachineGuy]

This is why we need Hunger Games.

[ProjectWheyhem]

Women's rights are an illusion.

Feminism is the wolf in sheep's clothing that has become the tool with which to enslave women.

- Pre-1970's men were the primary earners.

- Men have very few expenses besides a little beer/entertainment.

- The majority of the lifetime expenses were of pragmatic nature; car, house, children's college fund.

- Men did not spend frivolously.

- Women are far more materialistic.

- Make women the primary earners will allow these companies to get back a bigger portion of the wages they pay out via more inexpensive items.

- A tub of �100 cosmetics are far easier to build than a house for a family, plus an illiterate third world peasant can make it. Equals more profit for our Kleptocratic overlords.

- Feminism is a myth, a tool used to enslave women and minimise the effect of men earning money that they do not spend.

- Every feminist policy of the last forty years has had a devastating consequence to our lives, it was engineered.

- The nuclear family was a stabilising force. Prosperity for all equalled less profit for the few.

Most modern women do not associate/identify with feminism at all any more. They never did, they were shamed and bullied into it, whilst their contributions to the world in the form of motherhood were belittled and vilified.

[MikeHawkBiggums]

Not totalitarian at all. Guys need to wake up and stop voting like they're women. There's a small minority of women out there who understand that voting liberal in our day and age isn't good for our national security, but they are totally trumped by "sensitive" men's voting patterns.

And voting for conservatives is? LMAO. Yeah, let's vote for conservatives so we can get an Iraq 2.0. I've got some better ideas:

- Let's not vote for politicians (whether liberal or conservative) that have been bought off by defense contractors.

- Let's support an overhaul of the system (getting money out of politics) so that our politicians actually represent us and not a few billionaires.

[Hesher]

Also, insert 'black' instead of 'woman' into many of your points and it could be directly from the '50s.

You mean the part where I said:

extending the right to vote to women is a basic human right, that no person should be denied

[rhyfelwr]

A lot of people shouldn't be allowed to vote for a number of reasons but that's democracy if you don't like it feel free to move to a country ruled by a dictator

[Footzy]

Only land owning citizens above 35-40 should vote.
Woman should not be allowed to vote or own land.
Very quickly illegal immigrants, dreamers, anchors would dragged out of America. Ruasia/iran/china would be trembling at what will be coming their way.

[Hesher]

And voting for conservatives is!? LMAO. Yeah, let's vote for conservatives so we can get an Iraq 2.0. I've got some better ideas:

- Let's not vote for politicians (whether liberal or conservative) that have been bought off by defense contractors.

- Let's support an overhaul of the system (getting money out of politics) so that our politicians actually represent us and not a few billionaires.

Let's see your list of politicians you're in favor of voting for.

Let's see your overhaul of the system.


Yeah, that's what I thought.

[Hesher]

A lot of people shouldn't be allowed to vote for a number of reasons but that's democracy if you don't like it feel free to move to a country ruled by a dictator

Please read my post again. I'm actually encouraging people to vote, but to do so in a manner that isn't subservient.

[Chesso95]

Just a fun fact, i can't remember exactly which election it was, but some time in the 30s in spain, women overwhelmingly voted right and the regim they voted for actually stripped some of their rights when they came to power

remember reading about it in history class and thinking it was pretty funny

[MikeHawkBiggums]

Let's see your list of politicians you're in favor of voting for.

http://lessig2016.us

Let's see your overhaul of the system.

http://www.wolf-pac.com

[WizardsOfAus]

If you took away women's right to vote, feminism would die and the result would be plummeting divorce rates, less crime, fewer people on welfare, and a prosperous nation built on the backs of healthy, stable families.

[USBrah]

Totalitarianism of peace.

The R/P section would be shut down and PC politicians would be imprisoned.

[imbored21]

dont care about any of this. I just want them to legalize prostitution or I'm not voting for anyone.