|
Closed Thread
Results 1,351 to 1,380 of 9521
-
03-05-2009, 10:02 AM #1351
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: New Jersey, United States
- Age: 45
- Posts: 7,400
- Rep Power: 5829
-
03-05-2009, 10:07 AM #1352
Man I'm absolutely hating the market right now and I'm not even in. If Buffet is right then be greedy when others are fearful.
(\ /)
( . .)
c('')('') ☆♠$☆
-
-
03-05-2009, 10:26 AM #1353
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Kentucky, United States
- Age: 55
- Posts: 8,429
- Rep Power: 268994
Citigroup shares tumble below $1........WOW
Anyone have an opinion on this stock, if you bought at this price and held for 5 years ??
-
03-05-2009, 10:37 AM #1354
-
03-05-2009, 10:45 AM #1355
-
03-05-2009, 10:46 AM #1356
-
-
03-05-2009, 10:55 AM #1357
I'm definitely jumping on this Citigroup wagon. Im damn sure people see that the shares are mad cheap, and will want to buy it. Probably will spike to like $2 or $3 a share in a little bit. I've got $150 liquid funds to spend on Citigroup, so 150 shares arent that bad.
-
03-05-2009, 11:10 AM #1358
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 15,404
- Rep Power: 38419
lollzzz citigrouppppp
alll aborddd the train to the moonnnnnnnnnnnnnnRIP mainsqueeze530 1991-2013
-
03-05-2009, 11:14 AM #1359
Take a few thousands $$ and buy 5-10 of those stocks selling below $4-$5. $1-$2 are great. Don't buy those that have always ben pennies. But the broken down ones. Don't look at them for 5 yrs. This will be a story you can tell for the rest of your life.
Think about it. What does a few thousands mean to you, in the greater scheme of things over a life time? You don't see market crash like this too often in a life tme.
Whatever you do, DO NOT SELL after some profits. They are TO DA MOON!
-
03-05-2009, 11:19 AM #1360
-
-
03-05-2009, 11:27 AM #1361
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: the best h20, comes from, Fiji
- Posts: 45,692
- Rep Power: 486812
It's hard to win an argument with a smart person. It's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person. - Bill Murray
Mods - my avatar is locked by the admin and can't be changed.
-
03-05-2009, 11:34 AM #1362
-
03-05-2009, 11:40 AM #1363
Damn you guys and your C talk, it is tempting me too
jwdjrs you trying to pump and dump brah?(\ /)
( . .)
c('')('') ☆♠$☆
-
03-05-2009, 11:54 AM #1364
-
-
03-05-2009, 12:01 PM #1365
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Location: the best h20, comes from, Fiji
- Posts: 45,692
- Rep Power: 486812
It's hard to win an argument with a smart person. It's damn near impossible to win an argument with a stupid person. - Bill Murray
Mods - my avatar is locked by the admin and can't be changed.
-
03-05-2009, 12:16 PM #1366
JW I'd strongly recommend listening to Iceman here. He seems to be the only one with a true perception of reality lol. Of course I could be wrong, but when you think about it, people were saying the same thing about AIG when it was at $5, or even Citi itself when it was about $5 as well. (By 'same thing' I mean everyone was jumping on the BUY BUY BUY bandwagon.) Everyone on here seems to dislike Cramer for whatever their reasons, but he mentioned the other night that some of the top guys he knows at Citi don't even know what's going to happen. Until govt comes clean about what their true plans are, I'd steer clear of C.
-
03-05-2009, 12:24 PM #1367
You have to look at it this way. 1 Share of C is 0.99. Would you take a share of C over 2 cans of Coke? How much is a can of coke? I don't drink pop. I remember it used to be 50 cents.
What can you gain from 2 cans of coke?
-
03-05-2009, 12:37 PM #1368
As per my technician friend on the yahoo board who preaches this stuff:
A "phi date" is the "golden mean" (.612). Using the Fibonacci numbers and lining them up with the dates of previous highs and lows in the market, it gives you the dates on which a change in trend is expected. This guy, Robt. McHugh (Main Line Investors, Inc.) of which I have a subscription, has it in his newsletter. He's been 100% correct in his phi dates. The previous phi date cluster was 23 Dec - 29 Dec. The next phi date (trend change date) is February 18th. You can get a free 1-month trial subscription by signing up your e-mail address at this link:
https://www.technicalindicatorindex.com/..."At the cost of being repetitive, I have to once again state my amazement at the aspect of human nature that allows us to mix the most rigorous skepticism and the most acute gullibility"
"As drowned worshippers do not write histories of their experiences (it is better to be alive for that), so it is with the losers in history, whether people or ideas"
"Secular bull markets are designed to take the least amount of people along for the ride as possible, call it universal law."
-
-
03-05-2009, 12:40 PM #1369
-
03-05-2009, 12:44 PM #1370
-
03-05-2009, 12:49 PM #1371
-
03-05-2009, 01:02 PM #1372"At the cost of being repetitive, I have to once again state my amazement at the aspect of human nature that allows us to mix the most rigorous skepticism and the most acute gullibility"
"As drowned worshippers do not write histories of their experiences (it is better to be alive for that), so it is with the losers in history, whether people or ideas"
"Secular bull markets are designed to take the least amount of people along for the ride as possible, call it universal law."
-
-
03-05-2009, 01:19 PM #1373
-
03-05-2009, 01:36 PM #1374
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 8,658
- Rep Power: 58287
someone shoot down this theory please.
Say I create a message board, and get a large amout of people. let s say 500k (In message board land that's possible)
Say we all work together, as a giant hedge fund. We all decide to buy and sell the same stock at the same time.
On another note: I am going to trade with settled funds for the first time in a while tomorrow*** Misc Cigar Crew ***
-
03-05-2009, 01:43 PM #1375
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 8,658
- Rep Power: 58287
Also, about the citi thing. What would you say the odds are that your shares get wiped out? Lets call it 50% for argument sake.
Risk = 1k
if a "fair" bet you would get 2 to 1 odds on your money. So you are risking 1k with a 50% chance of losing it and a 50% chance at 2k.
This would be the best odds in the casino and just good odds in general. If you are a gambling man you would HAVE to take this bet.
Well in this case you are getting 50% odds to better your money and the upside is > 2 to 1.
Therefore if you have a few thousand to spare. As DC said, I think it would be a GREAT move to throw it on a few different stocks of this nature. This way you are increasing your percentage of winning.*** Misc Cigar Crew ***
-
03-05-2009, 01:54 PM #1376
-
-
03-05-2009, 01:55 PM #1377
-
03-05-2009, 01:56 PM #1378
I don't see why it wouldn't be possible, but when both buying and selling there must be other willing buyers and sellers. Following the basic laws of supply and demand, you can see where the price could be both artificially inflated and deflated if there are more buyers than sellers, and vice versa.
My point is that in your scenario, all the participants may be able to drive a stock's price up substantially. But when you all go to sell at the same time, who is going to buy all those shares at those inflated prices?
-
03-05-2009, 01:56 PM #1379
-
03-05-2009, 01:59 PM #1380
Bookmarks