|
-
07-23-2012, 05:04 PM #61
-
07-23-2012, 05:05 PM #62
-
07-23-2012, 05:06 PM #63
See that is where you are wrong. ANY weapon can be used as an "assault weapon" if you think about it.
Do you think if we gave up all the AR and AK style rifles, that those who seek to disarm us would just stop? They don't want us to have any guns. Period.
They start at the "assault rifles" which is an incorrect term, as a true assault rifle is a select fire, semi and fully automatic weapon. Who cares about the facts though right? Lets make it sensational.
Bottom line is that once they ban or take away the "assault" rifles, they will go after handguns, and other long guns until there is nothing left. It's already happened in other countries and it's already happened in many places here in America.
Don't be foolish. Gun control is not about crime or safety, it's about control."Johan tells me that your luggage, is the luggage of the poor."
"The will to survive is not as important as the will to prevail... the answer to criminal aggression is retaliation." - Col. Jeff Cooper USMC Ret.
-
07-23-2012, 05:07 PM #64
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,907
- Rep Power: 85705
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:09 PM #65
To preface what I'm going to say, where I come from, "gun control" and "banning guns" are two entirely separate entities (at least in my eyes), so when I say gun control, I'm merely referring to regulation. Anyway, I don't have a problem with gun ownership. Even if I didn't agree with it, it's impossible to ban guns in the United States regardless. What I don't agree with, however, is that a 24 year old medical student was able to easily and most importantly *legally* obtain a Smith and Wesson M&P 15 semi-automatic rifle and a 100 round drum magazine. If anyone can present me with a reason that anyone, not just James Holmes, can buy a semi-automatic rifle and 100 round drum magazine legally, beyond "the 2nd amendment says we can", I'd love to hear it. Unless you're repelling bands of marauding Taliban fighters from your booby-trapped third story apartment on a regular to semi-regular basis, the only other reason I can think of having, above all, a 100 round drum magazine, is to shoot up a public location.
Obstacles are things a person sees when he takes his eyes off his goal.
If you want to test your memory, try to recall what you were worrying about one year ago today.
The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark.
-
07-23-2012, 05:09 PM #66
To all those saying "Hey I'm from country X, we have stricter gun control laws, we have less crime!" I present to you Switzerland: Every single male when undergoing mandatory military service is given a M-57 they must keep in their house. The government also sells excess weaponry to citizens. They have extremely lax gun control laws.
Result? Switzlerland has the lowest gun crime rate in the WORLD.
http://news.***.co.uk/2/hi/1566715.stm
There is more to the gun problem then "Place restrictions on guns! Less people will die!"
For example when the United States invaded Iraq, it destabilized a lot of neighboring countries including Turkey, Syria, etc.. because guns started to be smuggled into those countries which raised gun crime rates.
You might notice the United States has a country called Mexico South of its border that is heavily destabilized. Criminals would still get guns from illegal trade with Mexico similar to how we get a sh!t ton of other drugs. **** half of you Americans against gun control probably smoke pot imported from Drug Wars down in Mexico. Shows how great prohibiting illegal substances worked out eh?
Or how about steroids which are illegal? As a result of being illegal and sensationalist reporting, more people misuse steroids and end up with a **** ton of problems. Whereas if it were legalized and we could educate citizens about it, and it could be used responsibly.
Time and time again prohibiting and banning various materials always has led to abuse, organized crime formation, an INCREASE in crime rates and so on.
If we did a good job educating all citizens like Switzerland does with guns, then we wouldn't have a problem. Gun control isn't the answer.
-
07-23-2012, 05:09 PM #67
-
07-23-2012, 05:09 PM #68
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:11 PM #69
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: Missouri, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 3,464
- Rep Power: 1634
Dude, really? Your home town is Chicago and you are saying this? Your city has the most restrictions on guns and your murder rate is through the roof. Please defend gun control some more....
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ecord-low.html
Where in that article does it address the part of my post that you bolded?Best Blog for Personal Finance:
-
07-23-2012, 05:12 PM #70
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 11,106
- Rep Power: 7819
Chicago does not have border controls though, so guns are still clearly easily obtained. I have had a gun put in my face in Chicago, had I been carrying or any of the girls you've mentioned been carrying would they not have been robbed at gun point?
You're constitution is not under threat from communism, and even if it was, you owning a gun is not going to effect that in todays democratic society. It's not the wild west any more. Changes to constitutions and laws are made in court rooms, not by someone pointing a gun.
The bad guys have guns. This is why the police are armed, there is no need for civilians to be armed.
Trends: Take school shootings for example. Look at notable shootings section in this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting
As I stated, gun control on a city basis is useless unless surrounding states, cities etc are in the same kind, otherwise guns will still be easily accessible. Also, I'd say our high murder rate is a direct result of a rather large collection of Urban-Youths and no amount of regulation can control that.
-
07-23-2012, 05:14 PM #71
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Woodbury, Georgia, United States
- Age: 20
- Posts: 6,447
- Rep Power: 12142
I'm a gun owner and an immigrant, although I'm a US citizen now so I'll say that you're wrong about "foreigners" being against gun ownership. From my view, it's mostly democrats and liberals (Which do contain a large amount of equality delusional people from all places).
Most of my military buddies came from other countries and support gun ownership.
You have a good message, but it's filled with stupid right wing bigotry which completely discredits you. Srs...Navy vet brah 02-11
-
07-23-2012, 05:15 PM #72
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:16 PM #73
-
07-23-2012, 05:16 PM #74
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: Missouri, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 3,464
- Rep Power: 1634
-
07-23-2012, 05:17 PM #75
-
07-23-2012, 05:18 PM #76
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 10,680
- Rep Power: 56694
Even if it isn't, we have the 2nd amendment to be ready for when some one tries to contest that. It is important so we can defend ourselves from the tyranny of government and people.
Doesn't matter, we have the 2nd amendment. The police aren't always going to be there during an event and giving that power to only government agencies just makes tyranny easier.
No matter if weapons are banned or not things like this will happen. Look at poor countries. They are armed by illegal gun runners. Why would it be any different here?
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:19 PM #77
-
07-23-2012, 05:20 PM #78
Are you trying to tell me that the bad guys specifically target police officers so it's okay for a civilian to be unarmed? WTF kinda logic is this, if YOU yourself were in a situation where there is a man about to break into your home and you have the option to a) have a gun or b) have nothing, you are going to choose b, because the police are armed and will save you? Interesting...Military Crew
Misc Firearms Crew
-
07-23-2012, 05:21 PM #79
Americans I understand if you may need to protect yourselves against the government at some point. lettuce be reality your governments is more corrupt then IRAQ in terms of control over media and freedom of speech which is of course backed by there own personal agenda. listen I am not blaming you civilians here but the government and dem jews... oh man dem jews they control you nikkas like chained up dog.
However ive been looking into Ron Paul and I think he can change this.
Ron Paul 2012!!
-
07-23-2012, 05:21 PM #80
Not having the same view/perspective as you=idiot
That has to be one of the most ignorant things i've ever heard.Instead of saying oh if you don't believe what i believe you're an idiot,you should listen to what other people have to say to gain perspective you don't have to agree just understand where they are coming from.I'm here to make friends and listen to other peoples problems,send me a PM if you want to talk.I misc at odd hours.
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:21 PM #81
I used to be against Americans having guns in their homes but now I feel that it is essential. Everyman should have the right to protect themselves, and I have a feeling thatall these shootings are going to be used for he who must not be named to pass a law that breaks more constitutional rights of US citizens. Do you know how easy it would be for the authorities to stroll in and do as they please? Wih citizens armed they would think twice. The right to bear arms is fundemental. Those that haven't read the constiution should sit down and attempt to do it. They weren't put there by accident.
-
07-23-2012, 05:21 PM #82
-
07-23-2012, 05:21 PM #83
-
07-23-2012, 05:21 PM #84
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:22 PM #85
- Join Date: Jul 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 40,907
- Rep Power: 85705
-
07-23-2012, 05:22 PM #86
-
07-23-2012, 05:22 PM #87
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: New York, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 4,209
- Rep Power: 12828
And that one main reason why America is not comparable to the rest of the first world. No other first-world country has Mexico bordering it, where guns are so easily obtained by criminals.
You're constitution is not under threat from communism, and even if it was, you owning a gun is not going to effect that in todays democratic society. It's not the wild west any more. Changes to constitutions and laws are made in court rooms, not by someone pointing a gun.
The bad guys have guns. This is why the police are armed, there is no need for civilians to be armed.
Trends: Take school shootings for example. Look at notable shootings section in this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting
As I stated, gun control on a city basis is useless unless surrounding states, cities etc are in the same kind, otherwise guns will still be easily accessible. Also, I'd say our high murder rate is a direct result of a rather large collection of Urban-Youths and no amount of regulation can control that.
Comparing gun crime with gun laws directly and making conclusions on said gun laws based on this alone is an incredibly flawed methodology.
-
07-23-2012, 05:23 PM #88
- Join Date: Oct 2011
- Location: Grahamstown, Eastern Cape, South Africa
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,173
- Rep Power: 0
Being pro-gun control has nothing to do with patriotism. Patriotism simply means supporting your country, if you support gun control because you think it will benefit the people of your country then you are being patriotic.
But blaming a difference in crime rates due to different racial demographics is sound logic?
-
-
07-23-2012, 05:25 PM #89
BRB banning guns
BRB every bad guy still has a gun
BRB zero problems solved
BRB higher taxes to pay for the war on guns which will inevitably fail"And oh, the marvel of it! the marvel of it! That tiny men should live and breathe and work, and drive so frail a contrivance of wood and cloth through so tremendous an elemental strife!" -Jack London
Clemson Tigers
Carolina Panthers
Always pick #2 Crew
-
07-23-2012, 05:26 PM #90
Bookmarks