Reply
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User Adiakritos's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: United States
    Age: 33
    Posts: 277
    Rep Power: 338
    Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Adiakritos is offline

    Long term bulking question

    This may be a silly question because I may have the logical answer already…

    But when it comes to bulking with the goal of adding as much mass as fast as possible naturally and without ending up with huge amounts of fat to chisel away…

    It seems the best approach is to basically control my bulk over 3-6 months, then maintain for a month, then trim down over a month or two, and then repeat this again and again until I reach some upper size limit given whatever constraints exist.

    I was at 175 this past April and decided I wanted a Fk ton more mass. So from then until now I “dirty” bulked and reached 212 over 8 months. So that’s around 3.7lbs gained per month. Assuming half of that is fat, I think I may have added about 19 lbs of pure fat.

    It will take me about 25 weeks to burn that off.

    I am regretting this dirty bulk now but whatever. I know how to lose fat.

    For a natural bodybuilder, is the cycle I described of bulking and trimming the a primary focus of getting as big as possible without getting seriously fat basically on point or am I missing anything?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Masstrophysicist Camarija's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2012
    Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Posts: 1,758
    Rep Power: 33663
    Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Camarija has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Camarija is offline
    I'm in the same boat.

    Long term bulking natty.

    Was at 182 lbs June 23 @ close to competing levels body fat

    Spoiler!


    Now I'm over 220 lbs

    That's about 40 lbs gain in 22 weeks

    Shooting for 235 lbs, but i'm stopping around the second week of January.

    Basically plan is to cut for 3 to 4 months after my bulk

    Going to be shredded for Summer again

    I dont know if its worth it or optimal, but I thought it's probably the only way to milk my natty gains to the max so giving it a try

    *edit*

    My logic was, while 'science' shows long term slow bulks are better, I don't know of any huge natty who didn't dirty bulk at some point
    Last edited by Camarija; 11-25-2022 at 02:21 PM.
    ► Intermediate Bodybuilding Classic Physique ► Renaissance Periodization Programming
    ► https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=180349883
    ► Progress Pictures
    ► https://i.ibb.co/r6RKF4p/Progress-Pictures.png
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Cut/Bulk/Repeat Spanishdream's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Posts: 3,122
    Rep Power: 8038
    Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000) Spanishdream is a name known to all. (+5000)
    Spanishdream is offline
    I'll always advocate a slower, controlled bulk. 250-300 over maintenance. Anything over isn't a benefit to you for muscle growth & just elongates the cut. Cutting is miserable so why make it longer than it needs to be when you can spend longer bulking?

    I like to bulk for 20-25 weeks usually putting on around 10-11lbs. That leaves me to cut for 8-10 weeks. That way I'm spending more time in a bulk, making progress than I am being miserable in a cut. It's probably as optimal as you can be for naturals.
    Currently cutting.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Registered User TAWS6's Avatar
    Join Date: Dec 2006
    Posts: 14,628
    Rep Power: 42084
    TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) TAWS6 has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    TAWS6 is offline
    Long term bulks ( 6 months ) are superior because the muscle building process for a natural is slow. Very slow. My preference is to cut to 12 percent and bulk to 15-16 percent over the course of 4-6 months. For me that’s between 175-185 lbs. which is hilarious to think that someone who’s been training for so long is only a 180 lb lifter at his peak..
    Reply With Quote

  5. #5
    Registered User Adiakritos's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: United States
    Age: 33
    Posts: 277
    Rep Power: 338
    Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Adiakritos is offline
    Originally Posted by Spanishdream View Post
    I'll always advocate a slower, controlled bulk. 250-300 over maintenance. Anything over isn't a benefit to you for muscle growth & just elongates the cut. Cutting is miserable so why make it longer than it needs to be when you can spend longer bulking?

    I like to bulk for 20-25 weeks usually putting on around 10-11lbs. That leaves me to cut for 8-10 weeks. That way I'm spending more time in a bulk, making progress than I am being miserable in a cut. It's probably as optimal as you can be for naturals.

    Makes perfect sense. Roughly 6 month bulk and then 2-3mo cuts again and again.
    Reply With Quote

  6. #6
    Registered User Adiakritos's Avatar
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: United States
    Age: 33
    Posts: 277
    Rep Power: 338
    Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50) Adiakritos will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    Adiakritos is offline
    Originally Posted by Camarija View Post
    I'm in the same boat.

    Long term bulking natty.

    Was at 182 lbs June 23 @ close to competing levels body fat

    Spoiler!


    Now I'm over 220 lbs

    That's about 40 lbs gain in 22 weeks

    Shooting for 235 lbs, but i'm stopping around the second week of January.

    Basically plan is to cut for 3 to 4 months after my bulk

    Going to be shredded for Summer again

    I dont know if its worth it or optimal, but I thought it's probably the only way to milk my natty gains to the max so giving it a try

    *edit*

    My logic was, while 'science' shows long term slow bulks are better, I don't know of any huge natty who didn't dirty bulk at some point
    Nice aesthetics brah.

    And that makes sense. Basically right on with that I thought - bill for like 6 mo and then cut for 2-3 ish depending.

    Sounds like you started super low bf.

    I read that right after a cut is a good time to start a bill because the body is ready to absorb all the additional nutrition rapidly and it sorta jumpstarts the bulking process.
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts