Reply
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User TheJokerKing666's Avatar
    Join Date: Apr 2018
    Age: 54
    Posts: 1
    Rep Power: 0
    TheJokerKing666 is on a distinguished road. (+10)
    TheJokerKing666 is offline

    Exclamation I know math shouldn't be that accurate, but!!!!

    Regarding the 1 lb fat = 3500 kcals, THIS DOESN'T MEAN AT ALL THAT if I spent 3500 kcals IN ADDITION TO MY BMR, I will ever burn 1 lb fat, since calorie expenditure won't be all from fats, right? I mean there's water and glycogen (in muscles and liver), in addition to carbs (glucose in the blood).

    Now Considering the FBZ rule, which is purely statistical, maximum fat calories expenditure would be about 70-75% of the total calories, therefore to burn 3500 kcals of fats (corresponds to 1 lb), you have to burn =3500/0.75=4666.67 kcals, am I right?
    Reply With Quote

  2. #2
    Registered User JSim83's Avatar
    Join Date: Feb 2017
    Location: Finland
    Age: 41
    Posts: 785
    Rep Power: 3644
    JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500) JSim83 is a glorious beacon of knowledge. (+2500)
    JSim83 is offline
    Originally Posted by TheJokerKing666 View Post
    Regarding the 1 lb fat = 3500 kcals, THIS DOESN'T MEAN AT ALL THAT if I spent 3500 kcals IN ADDITION TO MY BMR, I will ever burn 1 lb fat, since calorie expenditure won't be all from fats, right? I mean there's water and glycogen (in muscles and liver), in addition to carbs (glucose in the blood).

    Now Considering the FBZ rule, which is purely statistical, maximum fat calories expenditure would be about 70-75% of the total calories, therefore to burn 3500 kcals of fats (corresponds to 1 lb), you have to burn =3500/0.75=4666.67 kcals, am I right?
    I don't understand why people focus on completely irrelevant things like this. Eat at deficit and you'll lose weight. Track your calories and weight and adjust the calories based on what you see on the scale. All you need to know is how to calculate your calories. That is all the math you need.
    My fat loss log: http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=173521121
    Reply With Quote

  3. #3
    Registered User nickym92's Avatar
    Join Date: Jan 2018
    Posts: 19
    Rep Power: 0
    nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50) nickym92 will become famous soon enough. (+50)
    nickym92 is offline
    I wouldn’t worry about the mah or anything. Best way to make sure you don’t lose muscle is to make sure you get enough protein in. Around 1g per pound of lbm. And keep your fat intakes to around .4xbodyweight. Keep those around that and hit the wieghts hard and stick to your calorie deficit. You can’t put an exact number on what proportion of what you’re going to lose, but you can follow those golden rules and watch the pounds drop and hope for the best.
    Reply With Quote

  4. #4
    Serpentarius's Avatar
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Location: Woodbridge, California, United States
    Age: 39
    Posts: 18,287
    Rep Power: 31164
    Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000) Serpentarius has much to be proud of. One of the best! (+20000)
    Serpentarius is offline
    Originally Posted by TheJokerKing666 View Post
    Regarding the 1 lb fat = 3500 kcals, THIS DOESN'T MEAN AT ALL THAT if I spent 3500 kcals IN ADDITION TO MY BMR, I will ever burn 1 lb fat, since calorie expenditure won't be all from fats, right? I mean there's water and glycogen (in muscles and liver), in addition to carbs (glucose in the blood).

    Now Considering the FBZ rule, which is purely statistical, maximum fat calories expenditure would be about 70-75% of the total calories, therefore to burn 3500 kcals of fats (corresponds to 1 lb), you have to burn =3500/0.75=4666.67 kcals, am I right?
    You are missing a key point, the amount of fat oxidation that occurs, toss that into the formula.
    There is always someone less fortunate, with real hunger, with real adversity, who made something of themselves. What is your excuse?
    Reply With Quote

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts